The pleth variability index as an indicator of the central extracellular fluid volume in mechanically ventilated patients after anesthesia induction: Comparison with initial distribution volume of glucose

Medical Science Monitor

Volumn 20, Issue , 2014, Pages 386-392

  Lu, Wenqing ^a   Dong, Jing ^a   Xu, Zifeng ^a   Shen, Hao ^a   Zheng, Jijian ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Artificial; Blood circulation; Extracellular fluid; Fluid therapy; Pleth variability index; Respiration

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; MIDAZOLAM; PHENYLEPHRINE; PROPOFOL; RINGER LACTATE SOLUTION; SEVOFLURANE; SUXAMETHONIUM; VASOACTIVE AGENT; VECURONIUM;

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ANESTHETIC EQUIPMENT; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; EXTRACELLULAR SPACE; FEMALE; HEMATOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; HUMAN; INITIAL DISTRIBUTION VOLUME OF GLUCOSE; MALE; PLETH VARIABILITY INDEX; PULSE PRESSURE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; VENTILATED PATIENT;

ADMINISTRATION, INTRAVENOUS; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD PRESSURE; DEMOGRAPHY; EXTRACELLULAR FLUID; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PULSE; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; ROC CURVE; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, ELECTIVE; SYSTOLE;

EID: 84897852619     PISSN: 12341010     EISSN: 16433750     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.890073     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E et al: Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med, 2004; 32: 691-99
2. Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, Perel A: Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: Functional haemodynamic parameters including the respiratory systolic variation test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth, 2005; 95: 746-55
3. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R: Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense. Crit Care Med, 2013; 41: 1774-81
4. Natalini G, Rosano A, Taranto M et al: Arterial versus plethysmographic dynamic indices to test responsiveness for testing fluid administration in hypotensive patients: A clinical trial. Anesth Analg, 2006; 103: 1478-84
5. Cannesson M, Musard H, Desebbe O et al: The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with vigileo/flotrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg, 2009; 108: 513-17
6. Cannesson M, Desebbe O, Rosamel P et al: Pleth variability index to monitor the respiratory variations in the pulse oximeter plethysmographic waveform amplitude and predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre. Br J Anaesth, 2008; 101: 200-6
7. Sandroni C, Cavallaro F, Marano C et al: Accuracy of plethysmographic indices as predictors of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med, 2012; 38: 1429-37
8. Vos JJ, Kalmar AF, Struys MM et al: Comparison of arterial pressure and plethysmographic waveform-based dynamic preload variables in assessing fluid responsiveness and dynamic arterial tone in patients undergoing major hepatic resection. Br J Anaesth, 2013; 110: 940-46
9. Ishihara H, Shimodate Y, Koh H et al: The initial distribution volume of glucose and cardiac output in the critically ill. Can J Anaesth, 1993; 40: 28-31
10. Ishihara H, Suzuki A, Okawa H et al: The initial distribution volume of glucose rather than indocyanine green derived plasma volume is correlated with cardiac output following major surgery. Intensive Care Med, 2000; 26: 1441-48
11. Iwakawa T, Ishihara H, Takamura K et al: Measurements of extracellular fluid volume in highly perfused organs and lung water in hypo- and hypervolaemic dogs. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 1998; 15: 414-21
12. Orban JC, Blasin-Chadoutaud A, Zolfaghari P et al: Hypovolaemic hypotension after abdominal aortic surgery is predicted by initial distribution volume of glucose. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2010; 27: 364-68
13. Suzuki A, Ishihara H, Okawa H et al: Can initial distribution volume of glucose predict hypovolemic hypotension after radical surgery for esophageal cancer? Anesth Analg, 2001; 92: 1146-51
14. Rose BO, Ishihara H, Okawa H et al: Repeatability of measurements of the initial distribution volume of glucose in haemodynamically stable patients. J Clin Pharm Ther, 2004; 29: 317-23
15. Kramer A, Zygun D, Hawes H et al: Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness following coronary artery bypass surgery. Chest, 2004; 126: 1563-68
16. Hirota K, Ishihara H, Tsubo T, Matsuki A: Estimation of the initial distribution volume of glucose by an incremental plasma glucose level at 3 min after i.V. Glucose in humans. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 1999; 47: 361-64
17. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL: Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics, 1988; 44: 837-45
18. He Z, Qiao H, Zhou W et al: Assessment of cardiac preload status by pulse pressure variation in patients after anesthesia induction: Comparison with central venous pressure and initial distribution volume of glucose. J Anesth, 2011; 25: 812-17
19. Monnet X, Teboul JL: Volume responsiveness. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2007; 13: 549-53
20. Pestel GJ, Hiltebrand LB, Fukui K et al: Assessing intravascular volume by difference in pulse pressure in pigs submitted to graded hemorrhage. Shock, 2006; 26: 391-95
21. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A: Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: A systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med, 2009; 37: 2642-47
22. Hashiba E, Ishihara H, Tsubo T et al: Use of initial distribution volume of glucose to determine fluid volume loading in pulmonary thromboembolism and right ventricular myocardial infarction. J Anesth, 2008; 22: 453-56
23. Desebbe O, Cannesson M: Using ventilation-induced plethysmographic variations to optimize patient fluid status. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2008; 21: 772-78
24. Haruna M, Kumon K, Yahagi N et al: Blood volume measurement at the bedside using icg pulse spectrophotometry. Anesthesiology, 1998; 89: 1322-28
25. Desebbe O, Boucau C, Farhat F et al: The ability of pleth variability index to predict the hemodynamic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients under general anesthesia. Anesth Analg, 2010; 110: 792-98
26. Michard F: Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2005; 103: 419-28; quiz 449-51.
27. Ornstein E, Eidelman LA, Drenger B et al: Systolic pressure variation predicts the response to acute blood loss. J Clin Anesth, 1998; 10: 137-40
28. Monnet X, Guerin L, Jozwiak M et al: Pleth variability index is a weak predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients receiving norepinephrine. Br J Anaesth, 2013; 110: 207-13
29. Takeyama M, Matsunaga A, Kakihana Y et al: Impact of skin incision on the pleth variability index. J Clin Monit Comput, 2011; 25: 215-21