Comparison of the accuracy of digitally fabricated polyurethane model and conventional gypsum model

Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 1-7

  Kim, So Yeun ^a   Lee, So Hyoun ^a   Cho, Seong Keun ^b   Jeong, Chang Mo ^a   Jeon, Young Chan ^a   Yun, Mi Jung ^a   Huh, Jung Bo ^a  

^a Pusan National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^b DIO Corporation   (South Korea)

Author keywords

3D scanning; Aaccuracy; Digital impression; Gypsum; Intraoral scanner; Polyurethane

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897768263     PISSN: 20057806     EISSN: 20057814     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4047/jap.2014.6.1.1     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Spear F, Puri S, Manji I. In-office CAD/CAM: the future of your practice? Dent Today 2009;28:68, 70-1.
2. Presbyter T, Hawthorne JG, Smith CS. On divers arts: The foremost medieval treatise on painting, glassmaking and metalwork. Mineola, NY; Dover Publications, 1979.
3. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 2009;28: 44-56.
4. Sutton AF, Mccord JF. Variations in tooth preparations for resin-bonded all-ceramic crowns in general dental practice. Br Dent J 2001;191:677-81.
5. Goodacre CJ, Campagni WV, Aquilino SA. Tooth preparations for complete crowns: an art form based on scientific principles. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:363-76.
6. Lowe RA. CAD/CAM Dentistry and Chariside Digital Impression Making. www.ineedce.com. Accessed August 2012.
7. Mörmann WH. The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:7S-13S.
8. Allen KL, Schenkel AB, Estafan D. An overview of the CEREC 3D CAD/CAM system. Gen Dent 2004;52:234-5.
9. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204:505-11.
10. Henkel GL. A comparison of fixed prostheses generated from conventional vs digitally scanned dental impressions. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2007;28:422-4, 426-8, 430-1.
11. Christensen GJ. Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140:1301-4.
12. Galhano Gá, Pellizzer EP, Mazaro JV. Optical impression systems for CAD-CAM restorations. J Craniofac Surg 2012;23:e575-9.
13. Touchstone A, Nieting T, Ulmer N. Digital transition: the collaboration between dentists and laboratory technicians on CAD/CAM restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:15S-9S.
14. Christensen GJ. The state of fixed prosthodontic impressions: room for improvement. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136: 343-6.
15. Survey respondents are upbeat and optimistic about the state of our industry. Lab Manag Today 2000;16:9-15.
16. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2010;38:553-9.
17. Ender A, Mehl A. Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions--an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 2011;14: 11-21.
18. Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113: 174-9.
19. Bindl A, Mörmann WH. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:441-7.
20. Scotti R, Cardelli P, Baldissara P, Monaco C. Clinical fitting of CAD/CAM zirconia single crowns generated from digital intraoral impressions based on active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2011 Oct 17.
21. Wöstmann B, Rehmann P, Balkenhol M. Accuracy of impressions obtained with dual-arch trays. Int J Prosthodont 2009; 22:158-60.
22. Quick DC, Holtan JR, Ross GK. Use of a scanning laser three-dimensional digitizer to evaluate dimensional accuracy of dental impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:229-35.
23. Mehl A, Ender A, Mörmann W, Attin T. Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 2009;12:11- 28.
24. Luthardt RG, Loos R, Quaas S. Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression. Int J Comput Dent 2005;8:283-94.
25. Huh JB, Kim US, Kim HY, Kim JE, Lee JY, Kim YS, Jeon YC, Shin SW. Marginal and internal fitness of three-unit zirconia cores fabricated using several CAD/CAM systems. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2011;49:236-44.
26. Lowe RA. Digital Master Impressions: A Clinical Reality. URL: http://www.cadentinc.com/pdfs/itero_DC_08_09.pdf. Accessed August 2012.
27. van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012;28:3-12.
28. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y. CAD/CAM systems available for the fabrication of crown and bridge restorations. Aust Dent J 2011;56:97-106.
29. Tinschert J, Natt G, Hassenpflug S, Spiekermann H. Status of current CAD/CAM technology in dental medicine. Int J Comput Dent 2004;7:25-45.
30. Sorensen JA. A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:18-24.
31. Moon BH, Yang JH, Lee SH, Chung HY. A study on the marginal fit of all-ceramic crown using CCD camera. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1998;36:273-92.
32. Tjan AH, Nemetz H, Nguyen LT, Contino R. Effect of tray space on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impressions. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:19-28.
33. Jørgensen KD. Factors affecting the film thickness of Zinc phosphate cements. Acta Odontol Scand 1960;18:479-90.
34. Christensen GJ. Marginal fit of gold inlay castings. J Prosthet Dent 1966;16:297-305.
35. Mclean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131: 107-11.
36. Mclean JW. Polycarboxylate cements. Five years' experience in general practice. Br Dent J 1972;132:9-15.