Evaluating the effects of non-neutral molecular markers on phylogeny inference

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2014, Pages

  Roje, Dawn M ^a  

^a DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RHODOPSIN; CODON; GENETIC MARKER; NUCLEOTIDE; RIBOSOME RNA; RNA 16S; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 12S;

ARTICLE; CODING; FISH; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC DISTANCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; IRBP GENE; MEMBRANE STRUCTURE; MLL GENE; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; NEUTRAL GENE THEORY; NEUTRAL MOLECULAR MARKER; NEUTRALITY; NON NEUTRAL MOLECULAR MARKER; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; NULL HYPOTHESIS; RHO GENE; RNF213 GENE; TREE; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; BIOLOGY; CODON; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CODON; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; FISHES; GENETIC MARKERS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NUCLEOTIDES; PHYLOGENY; RHODOPSIN; RNA, RIBOSOMAL; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S;

EID: 84897746475     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087428     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Castoe TA, de Koning APJ, Kim HM, Gu W, Noonan BP, et al. (2009) Evidence for an Ancient Adaptive Episode of Convergent Molecular Evolution. PNAS 106: 8986-8991.
2. Hagstrom GI, Hang DH, Ofria C, Torng E (2004) Using Avida to test the effects of natural selection on phylogenetic reconstruction methods. Artif Life 10: 157-166.
3. Hang D, Ofria C, Schmidt TC, Torng E (2003) The effect of natural selection on phylogeny algorithms. In: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, Chicago, Il, pp. 13-24.
4. Larmuseau MHD, Huyse T, Vancampenhout K, Van Houdt, JKJ, Volckaert PAM (2010) High molecular diversity in the rhodopsin gene in closely related goby fishes: A role for visual pigments in adaptive speciation? Mol Phyl Evol 55: 689-698.
5. Niemiller ML, Fitzpatrick BM, Shah P, Schmitz L, Near T (2012) Evolution 67-3: 732-748.
6. Tornabene L, Chen Y, Pezold F (2013) Gobies are deeply divided: phylogenetic evidence from nuclear DNA (Teleostei: Gobioidei: Gobiidae). Syst Biodivers 11: 345-361.
7. Chen WJ, Bonillo C, Lecointre G (2003) Repeatability of clades as a criterion of reliability: a case study for molecular phylogeny of Acanthomorpha (Teleostei) with larger number of taxa. Mol Phyl Evol 26: 262-288. (Pubitemid 36264257)
8. Dettai A, Lecointre G (2005) Further support for the clades obtained by multiple molecular phylogenies in the acanthomorph bush. Comptes Rendus Biologies 328: 674-689. (Pubitemid 40903701)
9. Taylor MS, Hellberg ME (2005) Marine radiations at small geographic scales: speciation in neotropical reef gobies (Elacatinus). Evolution 59: 374-385. (Pubitemid 40356050)
10. Mayden RL, Tang KL, Conway KW, Freyhof J, Chamberlain S, et al. (2007) Phylogenetic relationships of Danio within the order Cypriniformes: a framework for comparative and evolutionary studies of a model species. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 308B: 642-654. (Pubitemid 47528919)
11. Li B, Dettaï A, Cruaud C, Couloux A, Desoutter-Meniger M, et al. (2009) RNF213, a new nuclear marker for acanthomorph phylogeny. Mol Phyl Evol 50: 345-363.
12. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Meyers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215: 403-410.
13. Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nuc Acid Res 32: 1792-1797.
14. Jobb G (2008) TREEFINDER version of October 2008. Munich, Germany. Available: www.treefinder.de.
15. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24: 1596-1599. (Pubitemid 47236692)
16. Kosakovsky Pond SL, Frost SDW, Muse SV (2005) HyPhy: hypothesis testing using phylogenies. Bioinformatics 21(5): 676-679. (Pubitemid 40424796)
17. Kosavosky Pond SL, Frost SDW (2005) Not so different after all: comparisons of methods for detecting amino acid sites under selection. Mol Biol and Evol 22: 1208-1222.
18. Robinson DF, Foulds LR (1981) Comparison of phylogenetic trees. Math. Biosci 53: 131-147. (Pubitemid 11129084)
19. Felsenstein J (1993) PHYLIP: Phylogeny Inference Package. Version 3.5c. Distributed by the author. Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle.
20. Goloboff P (2008) Calculating SPR distances between trees. Cladistics 24: 591-597.
21. Goloboff P, Farris J, Nixon K (2003) T.N.T. Tree Analysis using New Technology. Program and documentation. Available: http://www.zmuc.dk/public/ phylogeny/tnt.
22. Kishino H, Hasegawa M (1989) Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence, data and the branching order in Hominoidea. J Mol Evol 29: 170-179. (Pubitemid 19206089)
23. Shimodaira H (2002) An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Syst Biol 51: 492-508.
24. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M (1999) Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol Biol Evol 16: 1114-1116. (Pubitemid 29368141)