The neurobiology of language beyond single words

Annual Review of Neuroscience

Volumn 37, Issue , 2014, Pages 347-362

  Hagoort, Peter ^a,b   Indefrey, Peter ^b,c  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Broca's area; Meta analysis; Neuropragmatics; Semantic processing; Syntactic processing; Wernicke's area

Indexed keywords

DIAGONAL BAND OF BROCA; FRONTAL CORTEX; HUMAN; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; META ANALYSIS; NEUROBIOLOGY; NEUROIMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SEMANTICS; TEMPORAL CORTEX; WERNICKE AREA; BRAIN MAPPING; FRONTAL LOBE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; LANGUAGE; PHYSIOLOGY; TEMPORAL LOBE; THEORY OF MIND;

BRAIN MAPPING; FRONTAL LOBE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; TEMPORAL LOBE; THEORY OF MIND;

EID: 84897644743     PISSN: 0147006X     EISSN: 15454126     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-013847     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Amodio DM, Frith CD. 2006. Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7:268-77
2. Amunts K, Catani M. 2015. Cytoarchitectonics, receptor architectonics and network topology of language. See Gazzaniga 2015. In press
3. Basnakova J,Weber K, Petersson KM, van Berkum J,Hagoort P. 2013. Beyond the language given: the neural correlates of inferring speaker meaning. Cereb. Cortex. In press
4. Bohrn IC, Altmann U, Jacobs AM. 2012. Looking at the brains behind figurative language-a quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on metaphor, idiom, and irony processing. Neuropsychologia 50:2669-83
5. Caramazza A, Zurif EB. 1976. Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: evidence from aphasia. Brain Lang. 3:572-82
6. Carrington SJ, Bailey AJ. 2009. Are there theory of mind regions in the brain? A review of the neuroimaging literature. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30:2313-35
7. Chen E, West WC,Waters G, Caplan D. 2006. Determinants of bold signal correlates of processing objectextracted relative clauses. Cortex 42:591-604
8. DeLong KA, Urbach TP, Kutas M. 2005. Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nat. Neurosci. 8:1117-21
9. Diaz MT, Hogstrom LJ. 2011. The influence of context on hemispheric recruitment during metaphor processing. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23:3586-97
10. Ferreira F, Bailey KGD, Ferraro V. 2002. Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 11:11-15
11. Friederici AD. 2012. The cortical language circuit: from auditory perception to sentence comprehension. Trends Cogn. Sci. 16:262-68
12. Friederici AD, Ruschemeyer SA, Hahne A, Fiebach CJ. 2003. The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: localizing syntactic and semantic processes. Cereb. Cortex 13:170-77
13. Garrido MI, Kilner JM, Kiebel SJ, Friston KJ. 2007. Evoked brain responses are generated by feedback loops. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:20961-66
14. Gazzaniga MS, ed. 2015. The Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 5th ed. In press
15. Grainger J, Rey A, Dufau S. 2008. Letter perception: from pixels to pandemonium. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12:381-87
16. Grice P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
17. Grill-Spector K, Henson R, Martin A. 2006. Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10:14-23
18. Hagoort P. 2005. On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9:416-23
19. Hagoort P. 2013. MUC (memory, unification, control) and beyond. Front. Psychol. 4:416
20. Hagoort P, Hald L, Bastiaansen M, Petersson KM. 2004. Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science 304:438-41
21. Hagoort P, Levinson SL. 2015. Neuropragmatics. See Gazzaniga 2015. In press
22. Hagoort P, van Berkum J. 2007. Beyond the sentence given. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 362:801-11
23. Hickok G, Poeppel D. 2007. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8:393-402
24. Indefrey P. 2011. Neurobiology of syntax. In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences, ed. PC Hogan, pp. 835-38. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
25. Indefrey P. 2012. Hemodynamic studies of syntactic processing. In The Handbook of the Neuropsychology of Language, ed. M Faust, pp. 209-28. Malden, MA: Blackwell
26. Indefrey P, Hellwig F, Herzog H, Seitz RJ, Hagoort P. 2004. Neural responses to the production and comprehension of syntax in identical utterances. Brain Lang. 89:312-19
27. Indefrey P, Levelt WJM. 2000. The neural correlates of language production. In The New Cognitive Neurosciences, ed. MS Gazzaniga, pp. 845-65. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
28. Indefrey P, LeveltWJM. 2004. The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition 92:101-44
29. Jackendoff R. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
30. Jackendoff R. 2007. A parallel architecture perspective on language processing. Brain Res. 1146:2-22
31. KuperbergGR, McGuire PK, Bullmore ET, BrammerMJ, Rabe-Hesketh S, et al. 2000. Common and distinct neural substrates for pragmatic, semantic, and syntactic processing of spoken sentences: an fMRI study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12:321-41
32. KuperbergGR, SitnikovaT,LakshmananBM. 2008. Neuroanatomical distinctions within the semantic system during sentence comprehension: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. NeuroImage 40:367-88
33. KutasM, Federmeier KD, Urbach ThP. 2015. The negatives and positives of prediction in language. See Gazzaniga 2015. In press
34. Lau E, Stroud C, Plesch S, Phillips C. 2006. The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis. Brain Lang. 98:74-88
35. LeveltWJM. 2013. A History of Psycholinguistics: The Pre-Chomskyan Era. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
36. Levinson SC. 2013. Action formation and ascription. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. J Sidnell, T Stivers, pp. 103-30. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell
37. Mar RA. 2011. The neural bases of social cognition and story comprehension. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 62:103-34
38. Mar RA, Oatley K. 2008. The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 3:173-92
39. Mars RB, Sallet J, Schuffelgen U, Jbabdi S, Toni I, Rushworth MF. 2012. Connectivity-based subdivisions of the human right temporoparietal junction area: evidence for different areas participating in different cortical networks. Cereb. Cortex 22:1894-903
40. MasonRA, JustMA.2009. The role of the theory-of-mind cortical network in the comprehension of narratives. Lang. Linguist. Compass 3:157-74
41. Menenti L, Gierhan SME, Segaert K, Hagoort P. 2011. Shared language: overlap and segregation of the neuronal infrastructure for speaking and listening revealed by functional MRI. Psychol. Sci. 22:1173-82
42. Metusalem R, Kutas M, Urbach TP, Hare M, McRae K, Elman JL. 2012. Generalized event knowledge activation during online sentence comprehension. J. Mem. Lang. 66:545-67
43. Meyer AS, Hagoort P. 2013. What does it mean to predict ones own utterances? Behav. Brain Sci. 36:367-68
44. Mitchell JP, Macrae CN, Banaji MR. 2006. Dissociable medial prefrontal contributions to judgments of similar and dissimilar others. Neuron 50:655-63
45. Rizzolatti G, Sinigaglia C. 2010. The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11:264-74
46. Rodd JM, Longe OA, Randall B, Tyler LK. 2010. The functional organisation of the fronto-temporal language system: evidence from syntactic and semantic ambiguity. Neuropsychologia 48:1324-35
47. Saxe R, Moran JM, Scholz J, Gabrieli J. 2006. Overlapping and non-overlapping brain regions for theory of mind and self reflection in individual subjects. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 1:229-34
48. Saxe, R. 2010. The right temporo-parietal junction: a specific brain region for thinking about thoughts. In Handbook of Theory of Mind, ed. A Leslie, T German, pp. 1-35. Hove, UK: Psychology Press
49. Segaert K,Menenti L, Weber K, Petersson KM, Hagoort P. 2012. Shared syntax in language production and language comprehension-an FMRI study. Cereb. Cortex 22:1662-70
50. Steinhauer K, Drury JE. 2012. On the early left-anterior negativity (ELAN) in syntax studies. Brain Lang. 120:135-62
51. Szewczyk JM, Schriefers H. 2013. Prediction in language comprehension beyond specific words: an ERP study on sentence comprehension in Polish. J. Mem. Lang. 68:297-314
52. Talairach J, Tournoux P. 1988. Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-D Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging. Stuttgart: Thieme
53. Thorpe S, Fize D, Marlot C. 1996. Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature 381:520-22
54. Tyler LK, Cheung TP, Devereux BJ, Clarke A. 2013. Syntactic computations in the language network: characterizing dynamic network properties using representational similarity analysis. Front. Psychol. 4:271
55. Tyler LK, Marslen-Wilson WD, Randall B, Wright P, Devereux BJ, et al. 2011. Left inferior frontal cortex and syntax: function, structure and behaviour in patients with left hemisphere damage. Brain 134:415-31
56. Van Berkum JJ, Brown CM, Zwitserlood P, Kooijman V, Hagoort P. 2005. Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 31:443-67
57. Van Berkum JJA, van den Brink D, Tesink C, Kos M, Hagoort P. 2008. The neural integration of speaker and message. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 20:580-91
58. Von Humboldt W. 1829. On the dual. Nouv. Rev. Ger. 1:378-81
59. Willems RM, Ozyurek A, Hagoort P. 2007. When language meets action: the neural integration of gesture and speech. Cereb. Cortex 17:2322-33
60. Xiang H-D, Fonteijn HM, Norris DG, Hagoort P. 2010. Topographical functional connectivity pattern in the Perisylvian language networks. Cereb. Cortex 20:549-60
61. Zwitserlood P. 1989. The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing. Cognition 32:25-64