The case study method in family business research: Guidelines for qualitative scholarship

Journal of Family Business Strategy

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 15-29

  De Massis, Alfredo ^a   Kotlar, Josip ^a  

^a Lancaster University   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Case studies; Case study research; Family business; Qualitative methods; Reliability; Validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897584510     PISSN: 18778585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.007     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Amabile T.M., Patterson C., Mueller J., Wojcik T., Odomirok P.W., Marsh M., et al. Academic-practitioner collaboration in management research: A case of cross-profession collaboration. Academy of Management Journal 2001, 44(2):418-431.
2. Amis J.M., Silk M.L. The philosophy and politics of quality in qualitative organizational research. Organizational Research Methods 2008, 11(3):456-480.
3. Astrachan J.H. Family firm and community culture. Family Business Review 1988, 1(2):165-189.
4. Bansal P., Corley K. Publishing in AMJ-Part 7: What's different about qualitative research?. Academy of Management Journal 2012, 55(3):509-513.
5. Barry, C.A. (1998) Choosing qualitative data analysis software: Altas/ti and Nudist compared. Sociological Research Online, 3(3), available at http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/3/3/4.html, accessed August 31st, 2013.
6. Bartunek J.M., Rynes S.L., Ireland R.D. What makes management research interesting, and why does it matter?. Academy of Management Journal 2006, 49(1):9-15.
7. Bhaskar R. The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences 1998, Routledge, London, UK.
8. Bryman A., Bell E. Business research methods 2007, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
9. Buckley P. Business history and international business. Business History 2009, 51(3):307-333.
10. Burgelman R.A. A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 1983, 28(2):223-244.
11. Campbell D.T. "Degrees of freedom" and the case study. Comparative Political Studies 1975, 8(1):178-191.
12. Chandler A. Strategy and structure 1962, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
13. Chenail R.J. Communicating your qualitative research better. Family Business Review 2009, 22(2):105-108.
14. Chrisman J.J., Chua J.H., Pearson A.W., Barnett T. Family involvement, family influence, and family centered non economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2012, 36(2):267-293.
15. Chua J.H., Chrisman J.J., Steier L.P., Rau S.B. Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2012, 36(6):1103-1113.
16. Clegg S.R. Positivism and post-positivism. The SAGE dictionary of qualitative management research 2008, 155-157. Sage, London, UK. R. Thorpe, R. Holt (Eds.).
17. Coffey A., Atkinson P. Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies 1996, Sage, London, UK.
18. Colli A. Contextualizing performances of family firms: The perspective of business history. Family Business Review 2012, 25(3):243-257.
19. Colli A., Howorth C., Rose M. Long-term perspectives on family business. Business History 2013, 55(6):841-854.
20. De Massis A., Chirico F., Kotlar J., Naldi L. The temporal evolution of proactiveness in family firms: The horizontal S-curve hypothesis. Family Business Review 2014, 27(1). 10.1177/0894486513506114.
21. De Massis A., Chua J.H., Chrisman J.J. Factors preventing intra family succession. Family Business Review 2008, 21(2):183-199.
22. De Massis A., Frattini F., Lichtenthaler U. Research on technological innovation in family firms: Present debates and future directions. Family Business Review 2013, 26(1):10-31.
23. De Massis A., Frattini F., Pizzurno E., Cassia L. Product innovation in family vs. non-family firms: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Small Business Management 2013, (in press). 10.1111/jsbm.12068.
24. De Massis A., Kotlar J. Prioritizing stakeholders in family firms: CEO responses to stakeholder attributes and goals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the academy of management 2012.
25. De Massis A., Kotlar J., Campopiano G., Cassia L. Dispersion of family ownership and the performance of small-to-medium size private family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy 2013, 4(3):166-175. 10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.05.001.
26. De Massis A., Kotlar J., Chua J.H., Chrisman J.J. Ability and willingness as sufficiency conditions for family-oriented particularistic behavior: Implications for theory and empirical studies. Journal of Small Business Management 2014, (in press). 10.1111/jsbm.12102.
27. De Massis A., Kotlar J., Frattini F. Is social capital perceived as a source of competitive advantage or disadvantage for family firms? An exploratory analysis of CEO perceptions. Journal of Entrepreneurship 2013, 22(1):15-41.
28. De Massis A., Sharma P., Chua J.H., Chrisman J.J., Kotlar J. State-of-the-art of family business research. Family business studies: An annotated bibliography 2012, Edward Elgar, Northhampton, MA. A. De Massis, P. Sharma, J.H. Chua, J.J. Chrisman (Eds.).
29. DeAngelo H., DeAngelo L. Controlling stockholders and the disciplinary role of corporate payout policy: A study of the Times Mirror Company. Journal of Financial Economics 2000, 56(2):153-207.
30. Denzin N.K. Interpretive interactionism 2001, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
31. Denzin N.K., Lincoln Y.S. Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research 1994, 1-17. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.).
32. Dyck B., Mauws M., Starke F.A., Mischke G.A. Passing the baton: The importance of sequence, timing, technique and communication in executive succession. Journal of Business Venturing 2002, 17(2):143-162.
33. Easterby-Smith M., Golden-Biddle K., Locke K. Working with pluralism determining quality in qualitative research. Organizational Research Methods 2008, 11(3):419-429.
34. Eisenhardt K.M. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 1989, 14(4):532-550.
35. Eisenhardt K.M., Graebner M.E. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal 2007, 50(1):25-32.
36. Fletcher D.E. Family and enterprise. Enterprise and small business: Principles, practice and policy 2000, 155-165. Prentice Hall, London. S. Carter, D. Jones-Evans (Eds.).
37. Frattini F., Bianchi M., De Massis A., Sikimic U. The role of early adopters in the diffusion of new products: Differences between platform and non-platform innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management 2013, 31(3). 10.1111/jpim.12108.
38. Gersick K.E., Davis J.A., Hampton M.M., Lansberg I. Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business 1997, Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA.
39. Gibbert M., Ruigrok W. The 'what' and 'how' of case study rigor: Three strategies based on published work. Organizational Research Methods 2010, 13(4):710-737.
40. Gibbert M., Ruigrok W., Wicki B. What passes as a rigorous case study?. Strategic Management Journal 2008, 29(13):1465-1474.
41. Gioia D.A., Corley C.G., Hamilton A.M. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods 2012, 16(1):15-31.
42. Gioia D.A., Thomas J.B. Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly 1996, 41(3):370-403.
43. Glaser B., Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies of qualitative research 1967, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London, UK.
44. Glick W.H., Huber G.P., Miller G.C., Doty D.H., Sutcliffe K.M. Studying changes in organizational design and effectiveness: Retrospective event histories and periodic assessments. Organization Science 1990, 1(3):293-312.
45. Golden B.R. The past is the past-Or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Academy of Management Journal 1992, 35(4):848-860.
46. Graebner M.E., Eisenhardt K.M. The seller's side of the story: Acquisition as courtship and governance syndicate in entrepreneurial firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 2004, 49(3):366-403.
47. Graebner M.E., Martin J.A., Roundy P.T. Qualitative data: Cooking without a recipe. Strategic Organization 2012, 10(3):276-284.
48. Graves C., Thomas J. Determinants of the internationalization pathways of family firms: An examination of family influence. Family Business Review 2008, 21(2):151-167.
49. Hall A., Melin L., Nordqvist M. Entrepreneurship as radical change in the family business: Exploring the role of cultural patterns. Family Business Review 2001, 14(3):193-208.
50. Hall A., Nordqvist M. Professional management in family businesses: Toward an extended understanding. Family Business Review 2008, 21(1):51-69.
51. Howorth C., Westhead P., Wright M. Buyouts, information asymmetry and the family management dyad. Journal of Business Venturing 2004, 19(4):509-534.
52. Huber G.P., Power D.J. Retrospective reports of strategic-level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Management Journal 1985, 6(2):171-180.
53. Ibrahim A., Soufani K., Lam J. A study of succession in a family firm. Family Business Review 2001, 14(3):245-258.
54. Irava W.J., Moores K. Clarifying the strategic advantage of familiness: Unbundling its dimensions and highlighting its paradoxes. Journal of Family Business Strategy 2010, 1(3):131-144.
55. Jick T.D. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly 1979, 24(4):602-611.
56. Johannisson B., Huse M. Recruiting outside board members in the small family business: An ideological challenge. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 2000, 12(4):353-378.
57. Karra N., Tracey P., Phillips N. Altruism and agency in the family firm: Exploring the role of family, kinship, and ethnicity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2006, 30(6):861-877.
58. Knafl K.A., Breitmayer B.J. Triangulation in qualitative research: Issues of conceptual clarity and purpose. Qualitative nursing research: A contemporary dialogue 1989, 209-220. Aspen, Rockville, MD. J. Morse (Ed.).
59. Kotlar J., De Massis A. Goal setting in family firms: Goal diversity, social interactions, and collective commitment to family-centered goals. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2013, 37(6):1263-1288.
60. Kotlar J., De Massis A., Frattini F., Bianchi M., Fang H. Technology acquisition in family and non-family firms: A longitudinal analysis of Spanish manufacturing firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management 2013, 30(6):1073-1088.
61. Kumar N., Stern L.W., Anderson J.C. Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Academy of Management Journal 1993, 36(6):1633-1651.
62. Lambrecht J. Multigenerational transition in family businesses: A new explanatory model. Family Business Review 2005, 18(4):267-282.
63. Leonard-Barton D. A dual methodology for case studies: Synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organization Science 1990, 1(3):248-266.
64. Maxwell J.A. Qualitative research design: An interactive approach 2012, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
65. Miles M.B., Huberman A.M. Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods 1994, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
66. Miller D., Steier L., Le Breton-Miller I. Lost in time: Intergenerational succession, change, and failure in family business. Journal of Business Venturing 2003, 18(4):513-531.
67. Mitchell R.K., Agle B.R., Chrisman J.J., Spence L.J. Toward a theory of stakeholder salience in family firms. Business Ethics Quarterly 2011, 21(2):235-255.
68. Murray B. The succession transition process: A longitudinal perspective. Family Business Review 2003, 16(1):17-33.
69. Myers M.D. Qualitative research in business and management 2013, Sage, London, UK.
70. Nordqvist M., Hall A., Melin L. Qualitative research on family businesses: The relevance and usefulness of the interpretive approach. Journal of Management & Organization 2009, 15(3):294-308.
71. Nordqvist M., Melin L. The promise of the strategy as practice perspective for family business strategy research. Journal of Family Business Strategy 2010, 1(1):15-25.
72. Numagami T. The infeasibility of invariant laws in management studies: A reflective dialogue in defense of case studies. Organization Science 1998, 9(1):2-15.
73. Nutt P.G. The tactics of implementation. Academy of Management Journal 1986, 29(2):230-261.
74. Parada M.J., Nordqvist M., Gimeno A. Institutionalizing the family business: The role of professional associations in fostering a change of values. Family Business Review 2010, 23(4):355-372.
75. Patton M.Q. Qualitative evaluation and research methods 1990, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
76. Penrose E.T. The growth of the firm-A case study: The Hercules Powder Company. Business History Review 1960, 34(1):1-23.
77. Pettigrew A.M. The politics of organizational decision making 1973, Tavistock, London, UK.
78. Pettigrew A.M. Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science 1990, 1(3):267-292.
79. Pratt M.G. From the editors: For the lack of a boilerplate: Tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal 2009, 52(5):856-862.
80. Salancik G., Meindl J.R. Corporate attributions as strategic illusions of management control. Administrative Science Quarterly 1984, 29(2):238-254.
81. Salvato C., Chirico F., Sharma P. A farewell to the business. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 2010, 22(3/4):321-348.
82. Salvato C., Corbetta G. Transitional leadership of advisors as a facilitator of successors' leadership construction. Family Business Review 2013, 26(3):235-255.
83. Schwandt T.A. Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics and social constructionism. Handbook of qualitative research 2000, Sage Publications, Thousands Oaks. 2nd ed. N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.).
84. Schwenk G.R. The use of participant recollection in the modeling of organizational decision processes. Academy of Management Review 1985, 10(3):496-503.
85. Siggelkow N. Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal 2007, 50(1):20-24.
86. Stake R.E. The art of case study research 1995, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
87. Stake R.E. Qualitative case studies. The Sage handbook of qualitative research 2005, 433-466. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. 3rd ed. N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.).
88. Stake R.E. Multiple case study analysis 2013, Guilford Press, New York, NJ.
89. Steier L. Family firms, plural forms of governance, and the evolving role of trust. Family Business Review 2001, 14(4):353-368.
90. Steier L.P., Miller D. Pre- and post-succession governance philosophies in entrepreneurial family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy 2010, 1(3):145-154.
91. Strauss A., Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory 1998, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
92. Tagiuri R., Davis J.A. On the goals of successful family companies. Family Business Review 1992, 5(1):43-62.
93. Tagiuri R., Davis J. Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review 1996, 9(2):199-208.
94. Tesch R. Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools 1990, Routledge, London, UK.
95. Tracy S.J. Qualitative quality: Eight 'big-tent' criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry 2010, 16(10):837-851.
96. Welch C., Piekkari R., Plakoyiannaki E., Paavilainen-tymaki E. Theorizing from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies 2011, 42(5):740-762.
97. Yin R. The case study crisis: Some answers. Administrative Science Quarterly 1981, 26(1):58-65.
98. Yin R. Case study research 1984, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.
99. Yin R. Applications of case study research 2003, Sage Publications, Inc., London, UK.