Mechanism of Tc toxin action revealed in molecular detail

Nature

Volumn 508, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 61-65

  Meusch, Dominic ^a   Gatsogiannis, Christos ^a   Efremov, Rouslan G ^a   Lang, Alexander E ^b   Hofnagel, Oliver ^a   Vetter, Ingrid R ^a   Aktories, Klaus ^b,c   Raunser, Stefan ^a,d  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR PHYSIOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^d FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SIALIDASE; TC TOXIN; TOXIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

BACTERIUM; ENZYME ACTIVITY; HOST SPECIFICITY; MEMBRANE; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; PATHOGEN; PH; PROTEIN; TOXIN; TRANSLOCATION;

ARTICLE; CHANNEL GATING; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENTROPY; FEMALE; HOST RANGE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MEMBRANE; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN UNFOLDING; RECEPTOR BINDING;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

ADP RIBOSE TRANSFERASES; BACTERIAL TOXINS; BINDING SITES; CELL MEMBRANE; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; HOST SPECIFICITY; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NEURAMINIDASE; PHOTORHABDUS; POROSITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEIN SUBUNITS; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; PROTEIN UNFOLDING; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 84897574368     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature13015     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Waterfield, N. R., Bowen, D. J., Fetherston, J. D., Perry, R. D.&ffrench-Constant, R. H. The tc genes of Photorhabdus: a growing family. Trends Microbiol. 9, 185-191 (2001).
2. ffrench-Constant, R. H. & Bowen, D. J. Novel insecticidal toxins from nematodesymbiotic bacteria. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 57, 828-833 (2000).
3. Hares, M. C. et al. The Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and Yersinia pestis toxin complex is active against culturedmammalian cells. Microbiology 154, 3503-3517 (2008).
4. Sheets, J. J. et al. Insecticidal toxin complex proteins from Xenorhabdus nematophilus: structure and pore formation. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 22742-22749 (2011).
5. Gatsogiannis, C. et al. A syringe-like injection mechanism in Photorhabdus luminescens toxins. Nature 495, 520-523 (2013).
6. Bravo, A. & Sobero?n, M. How to cope with insect resistance to Bt toxins? Trends Biotechnol. 26, 573-579 (2008).
7. ffrench-Constant, R. H., Eleftherianos, I. & Reynolds, S. E. A nematode symbiont sheds light on invertebrate immunity. Trends Parasitol. 23, 514-517 (2007).
8. Lang, A. E. et al. Photorhabdus luminescens toxins ADP-ribosylate actin and RhoA to force actin clustering. Science 327, 1139-1142 (2010).
9. Busby, J. N., Panjikar, S., Landsberg, M. J., Hurst, M. R. H. & Lott, J. S. The BC component of ABC toxins is an RHS-repeat-containing protein encapsulation device. Nature 501, 547-550 (2013).
10. Landsberg, M. J. et al. 3D structure of the Yersinia entomophaga toxin complex and implications for insecticidal activity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20544-20549 (2011).
11. Lee, S. C. et al. Structural characterisation of the insecticidal toxin XptA1, reveals a 1.15MDa tetramer with a cage-like structure. J. Mol. Biol. 366, 1558-1568 (2007).
12. Lesieur, C., Vesey-Semje, B., Abrami, L., Fivaz, M. & Gisou van der Goot, F. Membrane insertion: the strategies of toxins. Mol. Membr. Biol. 14, 45-64 (1997).
13. Murphy, J. R. Mechanism of diphtheria toxin catalytic domain delivery to the eukaryotic cell cytosol and the cellular factors that directly participate in the process. Toxins 3, 294-308 (2011).
14. Young, J. A. T. & Collier, R. J. Anthrax toxin: receptor binding, internalization, pore formation, and translocation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 76, 243-265 (2007).
15. Varghese, J. N., Laver, W. G. & Colman, P. M. Structure of the influenza virus glycoprotein antigen neuraminidase at 2.9A resolution. Nature 303, 35-40 (1983).
16. Choe, S. et al. The crystal structure of diphtheria toxin. Nature 357, 216-222 (1992).
17. Petosa, C., Collier, R. J., Klimpel, K. R., Leppla, S. H. & Liddington, R. C. Crystal structure of the anthrax toxin protective antigen. Nature 385, 833-838 (1997).
18. Li, Z., Strunk, J. J., Lamken, P., Piehler, J. & Walz, T. The EM structure of a type I interferon-receptor complex reveals a novel mechanism for cytokine signaling. J. Mol. Biol. 377, 715-724 (2008).
19. Humphries, M. J. Integrin structure. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 28, 311-339 (2000).
20. Lang, A. E., Konukiewitz, J., Aktories, K. & Benz, R. TcdA1 of Photorhabdus luminescens: electrophysiological analysis of pore formation and effector binding. Biophys. J. 105, 376-384 (2013).
21. Blaustein, R. O., Koehler, T. M., Collier, R. J. & Finkelstein, A. Anthrax toxin: channelforming activity of protective antigen in planar phospholipid bilayers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 2209-2213 (1989).
22. Brown, M. J., Thoren, K. L. & Krantz, B. A. Charge requirements for proton gradient-driven translocation of anthrax toxin. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 23189-23199 (2011).
23. Feld, G. K., Brown, M. J. & Krantz, B. A. Ratcheting up protein translocation with anthrax toxin. Protein Sci. 21, 606-624 (2012).
24. Krantz, B. A. et al. A phenylalanine clamp catalyzes protein translocation through the anthrax toxin pore. Science 309, 777-781 (2005).
25. Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4. The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 50, 760-763 (1994).
26. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 213-221 (2010).
27. Hohn, M. et al. SPARX, a new environment for Cryo-EMimage processing. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 47-55 (2007).
28. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera-a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605-1612 (2004).
29. Berendsen, H. & van der Spoel, D. GROMACS: a message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation. Comput. Phys. Commun. 91, 43-56 (1995).
30. Kabsch, W. XDS. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 125-132 (2010).
31. Evans, P. R. in Joint CCP4 and ESF-EACBM Newsletter on Protein Crystallography Vol. 33, 22-24 (European Science Foundation, 1997).
32. French, S. & Wilson, K. On the treatment of negative intensity observations. Acta Crystallogr. A 34, 517-525 (1978).
33. Strong, M. et al. Toward the structural genomics of complexes: crystal structure of a PE/PPE protein complex from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 8060-8065 (2006).
34. McCoy, A. J. et al.Phaser crystallographic software. J.Appl. Crystallogr.40, 658-674 (2007).
35. Baker, D., Bystroff, C., Fletterick, R. J. & Agard, D. A. PRISM: topologically constrained phased refinement for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 49, 429-439 (1993).
36. Jones, T. A.Agraphicsmodelbuilding andrefinement systemformacromolecules. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 11, 268-272 (1978).
37. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486-501 (2010).
38. Davis, I. W. et al. MolProbity: all-atomcontacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W375-W383 (2007).
39. Terwilliger, T. C. et al. Decision-making in structure solution using Bayesian estimates of map quality: the PHENIX AutoSol wizard. Acta Crystallogr. D 65, 582-601 (2009).
40. Cowtan, K. The Buccaneer software for automated model building. Tracing protein chains. Acta Crystallogr. D 62, 1002-1011 (2006).
41. Ludtke, S. J. 3-D structures of macromolecules using single-particle analysis in EMAN. Methods Mol. Biol. 673, 157-173 (2010).
42. Tang, G. et al. EMAN2: an extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 38-46 (2007).
43. Raunser, S. et al. Rubisco in complex with Rubisco large subunit methyltransferase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 3160-3165 (2009).
44. Fernadez, J. J., Luque, D., Caston, J. R. & Carrascosa, J. L. Sharpening high resolution information in single particle electron cryomicroscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 164, 170-175 (2008).
45. Anger, A. M. et al. Structures of the human and Drosophila 80S ribosome. Nature 497, 80-85 (2013).
46. Harpaz, Y., Gerstein, M. & Chothia, C. Volume changes on protein folding. Structure 2, 641-649 (1994).
47. Wang, Z. & Schroer, G. F. Real-space refinement with DireX: from global fitting to side-chain improvements. Biopolymers 97, 687-697 (2012).
48. Hayward, S. & Lee, R. A. Improvements in the analysis of domain motions in proteins fromconformational change: DynDomversion 1.50. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 21, 181-183 (2002).
49. Holm, L. & Rosenstrom, P. Dali server: conservation mapping in 3D. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, W545-W549 (2010).
50. Laskowski, R. A., Watson, J. D. & Thornton, J. M. ProFunc: a server for predicting protein function from 3D structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W89-W93 (2005).
51. Peez,A.,Marcha, I., Svozil, D.&Sponer, J. Refinement of theAMBERforce field for nucleic acids: improving the description of a/c conformers. Biophys. J. (2007).
52. Hessa, T. et al. Recognition of transmembrane helices by the endoplasmic reticulum translocon. Nature 433, 377-381 (2005).
53. Larkin, M. A. et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23, 2947-2948 (2007).
54. Ashkenazy, H., Erez, E.,Martz, E.,Pupko, T.&Ben-Tal, N. ConSurf2010: calculating evolutionary conservation in sequence and structure of proteins andnucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, W529-W533 (2010).
55. Krissinel, E.&Henrick, K. Inference ofmacromolecular assemblies fromcrystalline state. J. Mol. Biol. 372, 774-797 (2007).
56. Pellegrini-Calace, M., Maiwald, T. & Thornton, J. M. PoreWalker: a novel tool for the identification and characterization of channels in transmembrane proteins from their three-dimensional structure. PLOS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000440 (2009).
57. Jo, S., Lim, J. B., Klauda, J. B. & Im, W. CHARMM-GUI membrane builder for mixed bilayers and its application to yeast membranes. Biophys. J. 97, 50-58 (2009).
58. Walshaw, J. & Woolfson, D. N. Socket: a program for identifying and analysing coiled-coil motifs within protein structures. J. Mol. Biol. 307, 1427-1450 (2001).
59. Lemkul, J. A. & Bevan, D. R. Assessing the stability of Alzheimer's amyloid protofibrils using molecular dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. B 114, 1652-1660 (2010).
60. Jones, D. T. et al. Prediction of novel and analogous folds using fragment assembly and fold recognition. Proteins 61 (suppl. 7), 143-151 (2005).
61. Kumar, S., Rosenberg, J. M., Bouzida, D., Swendsen, R. H. & Kollman, P. A. The weighted histogram analysis method for free-energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method. J. Comput. Chem. 13, 1011-1021 (1992).
62. Sotomayor, M. & Schulten, K. Single-molecule experiments in vitro and in silico. Science 316, 1144-1148 (2007).
63. Erickson, H. P. Reversible unfolding of fibronectin type III and immunoglobulin domains provides the structural basis for stretch and elasticity of titin and fibronectin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 10114-10118 (1994).
64. Flory, P. J. Theory of elastic mechanisms in fibrous proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 78, 5222-5235 (1956).
65. Zhang, B., Xu, G.&Evans, J. S. A kineticmolecularmodel of the reversible unfolding and refolding of titin under force extension. Biophys. J. 77, 1306-1315 (1999).
66. Noy, A. Handbook of Molecular Force Spectroscopy (Springer, 2007).
67. Koenig, T. et al. Robust prediction of the MASCOT score for an improved quality assessment in mass spectrometric proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 7, 3708-3717 (2008).
68. Zhang, Z. & Marshall, A. G. A universal algorithm for fast and automated charge state deconvolution of electrospray mass-to-charge ratio spectra. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 9, 225-233 (1998).