Endometrial receptivity - Can it be diagnosed and controlled? And why does it matter?

Ginekologia Polska

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 149-153

  Mikołajczyk, Mateusz ^a   Skrzypczak, Jana ^a  

^a POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Poland)

Author keywords

Endometrium; Genomics; Infertility; Lipidomics; Metabolomics; Proteomics; Receptivity; Secretomics; Window of implantation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOMETRIUM; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FETOMATERNAL TRANSFUSION; GENOMICS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NIDATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY;

EMBRYO IMPLANTATION; ENDOMETRIUM; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENOMICS; HUMANS; INFERTILITY, FEMALE; MATERNAL-FETAL EXCHANGE; PREGNANCY;

EID: 84897540938     PISSN: 00170011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17772/gp/1706     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, De Mouzon J, [et al.]. The International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) Revised Glossary on ART Terminology, 2009. Hum Reprod. 2009, 24, 2683-2687.
2. Smith C, Grimm M, Schwegel M. Treatment of infertility in women. J Ann Pharm Assoc. 2012, 52 (4),27-42.
3. De Mouzon J, Goossens V, Bhattacharya S, [et al.]. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2007: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2012, 27 (4), 954-966.
4. Liang X, Ma J, Schatten H, Sun Q. Epigenetic changes associated with oocyte aging. Sci China Life Sci. 2012, 55 (8), 670-676.
5. Nagaoka SI, Hassold TJ, Hunt PA. Human aneuploidy: mechanisms and new insights into an age-old problem. Nat Rev Genet. 2012, 13 (7), 493-504.
6. Wu DH, Reynolds K, Maxwell R, [et al.]. Age does not influence the effect of embryo fragmentation on successful blastocyst development. Fert Steril. 2011, 95 (8), 2778-2780.
7. Hamamah S. Oocyte and embryo quality: is their morphology a good criterion? J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (paris). 2005, 34, 5S38-5S41.
8. Chen AA, Tan L, Suraj V, [et al.]. Biomarkers identified with time-lapse imaging: discovery, validation, and practical application. Fert Steril. 2013, 99 (4), 1035-1043.
9. Debrock S, Melotte C, Spiessens C, [et al.]. Preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy of embryos after in vitro fertilization in women aged at least 35 years: a prospective randomized trial. Fert Steril. 2010, 93 (2), 364-373.
10. Simpson JL. What next for preimplantation genetic screening? Randomized clinical trial in assessing PGS: necessary but not sufficient. Hum Reprod. 2008, 23 (10), 2179-2181.
11. Hertig AT, Rock J. Searching for early fertilized human ova. Gynecol Invest. 1973, 4 (3), 121-139.
12. Hertig AT, Rock J, Adams E. A description of 34 human ova within the first 17 days of development. Am J Anat. 1956, 98 (3), 435-493.
13. Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Baird DD. Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation. Effects on the probability of conception, survival of the pregnancy, and sex of the baby. N Eng J Med. 1995, 333 (23), 1517-1521.
14. Macklon NS, Geraedts JP, Fauser BC. Conception to ongoing pregnancy: the "black box" of early pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod Update. 2002, 8 (4),333-343.
15. Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, O'Connor JF, [et al.]. Incidence of early loss of pregnancy. N Eng J Med. 1988, 319 (4), 189-194.
16. Noyes R, Hertig AT, Rock J. Dating the endometrial biopsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975, 122 (2), 262-263.
17. Jones GE. Some newer aspects of the management of infertility. J Med Assoc. 1949, 141 (16), 1123-1129.
18. Myers ER, Silva S, Barnhart K, [et al.]. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the histological dating of the endometrium in fertile and infertile women. Fert Steril. 2004, 82 (5), 1278-1282.
19. Coutifaris C, Myers ER, Guzick DS, [et al.]. Histological dating of timed endometrial biopsy tissue is not related to fertility status. Fert Steril. 2004, 82 (5), 1264-1272.
20. Kazer RR. Endometrial biopsy should be abandoned as a routine component of the infertility evaluation. Fertil Steril. 2004, 82 (5), 1297-1298; discussion 1300-1302.
21. Nikas G, Drakakis P, Loutradis D, [et al.]. Uterine pinopodes as markers of the "nidation window" in cycling women receiving exogenous oestradiol and progesterone. Hum Reprod. 1995, 10 (5), 1208-1213.
22. Mikolajczyk M, Skrzypczak J, Wirstlein P. No correlation between pinopode formation and LIF and MMP2 expression in endometrium during implantation window. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2011, 49 (4), 615-621.
23. Quinn CE, Casper RF. Pinopodes: a questionable role in endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod Update. 2009, 15 (2), 229-236.
24. Check JH, Cohen R. Live fetus following embryo transfer in a woman with diminished egg reserve whose maximal endometrial thickness was less than 4 mm. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2011, 38 (4), 330-332.
25. Raga F, Bonilla-Musoles F, Casañ EM, [et al.]. Assessment of endometrial volume by threedimensional ultrasound prior to embryo transfer: clues to endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod. 1999, 14 (11), 2851-2854.
26. Puerto B, Creus M, Carmona F, [et al.]. Ultrasonography as a predictor of embryo implantation after in vitro fertilization: a controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2003, 79 (4), 1015-1022.
27. Ng EH, Yeung WS, Ho PC. Endometrial and subendometrial vascularity are significantly lower in patients with endometrial volume 2.5 ml or less. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009, 18 (2), 262-268.
28. Mikolajczyk M, Wirstlein P, Skrzypczak J. The impact of leukemia inhibitory factor in uterine flushing on the reproductive potential of infertile women--a prospective study. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2007, 58 (1), 65-74.
29. Skrzypczak J, Wirstlein P, Mikołajczyk M. Is glycodelin an important marker of endometrial receptivity? Ginekol Pol. 2005, 76 (10), 770-781.
30. Sundqvist J, Andersson KL, Scarselli G. Expression of adhesion, attachment and invasion markers in eutopic and ectopic endometrium, a link to the aetiology of endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2012, 27 (9), 2737-2746.
31. Mikolajczyk M, Wirstlein P, Szymanowski K, Skrzypczak J. In vivo correlation between IL-1beta concentration in uterine fluid and integrin expression pattern in infertile women. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2006, 55 (2), 156-163.
32. Skrzypczak J, Wirstlein PP, Mikolajczyk M. Could the Defects in the Endometrial Extracellular Matrix During the Implantation Be a Cause for Impaired fertility? Am J Reprod Immunol. 2007, 57 (1), 40-48.
33. Aplin JD. MUC-1 glycosylation in endometrium, possible roles of the apical glycocalyx at implantation. Hum Reprod. 1999, 14, Suppl 2, 17-25.
34. Horne AW, White JO, Margara RA, et al. MUC 1, a genetic susceptibility to infertility? Lancet. 2001, 357 (9265), 1336-1337.
35. Surveyor GA, Gendler SJ, Pemberton L, et al. Expression and steroid hormonal control of Muc-1 in the mouse uterus. Endocrinol. 1995, 136 (16), 3639-3647.
36. Dentillo DB, Souza FR, Meola J, et al. No evidence of association of MUC-1 genetic polymorphism with embryo implantation failure. Braz J Med Res. 2007, 40 (6), 793-797.
37. Aplin JD, Seif MW, Graham RA, et al. The endometrial cell surface and implantation. Expression of the polymorphic mucin MUC-1 and adhesion molecules during the endometrial cycle. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1994, 734, 103-121.
38. Kao LC, Tulac S, Lobo S, et al. Global gene profiling in human endometrium during the window of implantation. Endocrinol. 2002, 143 (6), 2119-2138.
39. Giudice LC. Microarray expression profiling reveals candidate genes for human uterine receptivity. Am J Pharmacogenomics. 2004, 4 (5), 299-312.
40. Riesewijk A, Martín J, Van Os R, et al. Gene expression profiling of human endometrial receptivity on days LH+2 versus LH+7 by microarray technology. Mol Hum Reprod. 2003, 9 (5), 253-264.
41. Haouzi D, Dechaud H, Assou S, et al. Insights into human endometrial receptivity from transcriptomic and proteomic data. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012, 24 (1), 23-34.
42. Gnainsky Y, Granot I, Aldo PB, et al. Local injury of the endometrium induces an inflammatory response that promotes successful implantation. Fertil Steril. 2010, 94 (6), 2030-2036.
43. Diaz-Gimeno P, Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D, et al. The accuracy and reproducibility of the endometrial receptivity array is superior to histology as a diagnostic method for endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril. 2013, 99 (2), 508-517.
44. Chen DJ, Hannan NJ, Mak Y, et al. Proteomic characterization of midproliferative and midsecretory human endometrium. J Proteome Res. 2009, 8 (4), 2032-2044.
45. Evans GE, Martíez-Conejero JA, Phillipson GT, et al.. Gene and protein expression signature of endometrial glandular and stromal compartments during the window of implantation. Fertil Steril. 2012, 97(6), 1365-1373.e2.
46. Burton GJ, Watson AL, Hempstock J, et al. Uterine glands provide histiotrophic nutrition for the human fetus during the first trimester of pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002, 87 (6), 2954-2959.
47. Baumann CG, Morris DG, Sreenan JM, Leese HJ. The quiet embryo hypothesis, molecular characteristics favoring viability. Mol Reprod Dev. 2007, 74 (10), 1345-1353.
48. Kwong WY, Osmond C, Fleming TP. Support for Barker hypothesis upheld in rat model of maternal undernutrition during the preimplantation period, application of integrated "random effects" statistical model. Reprod Biomed Online. 2004, 8 (5), 574-576.
49. Kwong WY, Wild AE, Roberts P, et al.. Maternal undernutrition during the preimplantation period of rat development causes blastocyst abnormalities and programming of postnatal hypertension. Development. 2000, 127 (19), 4195-4202.
50. Sordelli MS, Beltrame JS, Cella M, et al. Interaction between Lysophosphatidic Acid, Prostaglandins and the Endocannabinoid System during the Window of Implantation in the Rat Uterus. PloS one. 2012, 7 (9), e46059.
51. Achache H, Tsafrir A, Prus D, et al. Defective endometrial prostaglandin synthesis identified in patients with repeated implantation failure undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2010, 94 (4), 1271-1278.
52. Rackow BW, Taylor HS. Submucosal uterine leiomyomas have a global effect on molecular determinants of endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril. 2010, 93 (6), 2027-2034.
53. Rackow BW, Jorgensen E, Taylor HS. Endometrial polyps affect uterine receptivity. Fertil Steril. 2011, 95 (8), 2690-2692.
54. Liu H, Lang JH. Is abnormal eutopic endometrium the cause of endometriosis? The role of eutopic endometrium in pathogenesis of endometriosis. Med Sci Monit. 2011, 17 (4), 92-99.
55. Allaire C. Endometriosis and infertility, a review. J Reprod Med. 2006, 51 (3), 164-168.
56. Chen XJ, Huang HF. Research on minimal to mild endometriosis associated infertility. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2007, 36 (15), 515-520.
57. Bourgain C, Devroey P. The endometrium in stimulated cycles for IVF. Hum Reprod Update. 2003, 9 (6), 515-522.
58. Aflatoonian A, Oskouian H, Ahmadi S, Oskouian L. Can fresh embryo transfers be replaced by cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfers in assisted reproductive cycles? A randomized controlled trial. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010, 27 (10), 357-363.
59. Gleicher N, Vidali A, Barad DH. Successful treatment of unresponsive thin endometrium. Fertil Steril. 2011,95 (6), 2123.e13-e17.
60. Check JH, Choe JK, Cohen R, Summers-Chase D. Failure to Increase the Thickness of Thin Endometria with Intrauterine Infusion of Gamma Colony Stimulation Factor (G-CSF). Fertil Steril. 2013, 99 (3), S22.