An induced rebinding model of antigen discrimination

Trends in Immunology

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 153-158

  Dushek, Omer ^a,b   Van der Merwe, P Anton ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIGEN; LIGAND; T LYMPHOCYTE RECEPTOR; LYMPHOCYTE ANTIGEN RECEPTOR; PROTEIN BINDING;

ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY; ANTIGEN RECOGNITION; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING KINETICS; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX; MEMBRANE BINDING; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; T LYMPHOCYTE; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; HUMAN; IMMUNOLOGICAL TOLERANCE; IMMUNOLOGY; LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX; MODELS, IMMUNOLOGICAL; PROTEIN BINDING; RECEPTORS, ANTIGEN, T-CELL; SELF TOLERANCE;

EID: 84897458111     PISSN: 14714906     EISSN: 14714981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2014.02.002     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Daniels M., et al. Thymic selection threshold defined by compartmentalization of Ras/MAPK signalling. Nature 2006, 444:724-729.
2. Juang J., et al. Peptide-MHC heterodimers show that thymic positive selection requires a more restricted set of self-peptides than negative selection. J. Exp. Med. 2010, 207:1223-1234.
3. Altan-Bonnet G., Germain R.N. Modeling T cell antigen discrimination based on feedback control of digital ERK responses. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3:e356.
4. Dushek O., et al. Antigen potency and maximal efficacy reveal a mechanism of efficient T cell activation. Sci. Signal. 2011, 4:ra39.
5. Kalergis A.M., et al. Efficient T cell activation requires an optimal dwell-time of interaction between the TCR and the pMHC complex. Nat. Immunol. 2001, 2:229-234.
6. Govern C.C., et al. Fast on-rates allow short dwell time ligands to activate T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:8724-8729.
7. Aleksic M., et al. Dependence of T cell antigen recognition on T cell receptor--peptide MHC confinement time. Immunity 2010, 32:163-174.
8. McKeithan T.W. Kinetic proofreading in T-cell receptor signal transduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92:5042-5046.
9. Germain R., Stefanová I. The dynamics of T cell receptor signaling: complex orchestration and the key roles of tempo and cooperation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1999, 17:467-522.
10. Chan C., et al. Cooperative enhancement of specificity in a lattice of T cell receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98:5758-5763.
11. Stefanová I., et al. TCR ligand discrimination is enforced by competing ERK positive and SHP-1 negative feedback pathways. Nat. Immunol. 2003, 4:248-254.
12. Dushek O., et al. A role for rebinding in rapid and reliable T cell responses to antigen. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2009, 5:e1000578.
13. Francois P., et al. Phenotypic model for early T-cell activation displaying sensitivity, specificity, and antagonism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:E888-E897.
14. Fahmy T.M., et al. Increased TCR avidity after T cell activation: a mechanism for sensing low-density antigen. Immunity 2001, 14:135-143.
15. Zarnitsyna V.I., et al. Memory in receptor-ligand-mediated cell adhesion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:18037-18042.
16. Schamel W.W., et al. Coexistence of multivalent and monovalent TCRs explains high sensitivity and wide range of response. J. Exp. Med. 2005, 202:493-503.
17. Varma R., et al. T cell receptor-proximal signals are sustained in peripheral microclusters and terminated in the central supramolecular activation cluster. Immunity 2006, 25:117-127.
18. Lillemeier B.F., et al. TCR and Lat are expressed on separate protein islands on T cell membranes and concatenate during activation. Nat. Immunol. 2010, 11:90-96.
19. Sherman E., et al. Functional nanoscale organization of signaling molecules downstream of the T cell antigen receptor. Immunity 2011, 35:705-720.
20. Boyle S., et al. Quantum dot fluorescence characterizes the nanoscale organization of T cell receptors for antigen. Biophys. J. 2011, 101:L57-L59.
21. Kumar R., et al. Increased sensitivity of antigen-experienced T cells through the enrichment of oligomeric T cell receptor complexes. Immunity 2011, 35:375-387.
22. James J.R., et al. Single-molecule level analysis of the subunit composition of the T cell receptor on live T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:17662-17667.
23. Dunne P.D., et al. DySCo: quantitating associations of membrane proteins using two-color single-molecule tracking. Biophys. J. 2009, 97:L5-L7.
24. van der Merwe P.A., et al. Taking T cells beyond the diffraction limit. Nat. Immunol. 2010, 11:51-52.
25. Holler P.D., Kranz D.M. Quantitative analysis of the contribution of TCR/pepMHC affinity and CD8 to T cell activation. Immunity 2003, 18:255-264.
26. Chervin A.S., et al. The impact of TCR-binding properties and antigen presentation format on T cell responsiveness. J. Immunol. 2009, 183:1166-1178.
27. Huang J., et al. The kinetics of two-dimensional TCR and pMHC interactions determine T-cell responsiveness. Nature 2010, 464:932-936.
28. Huppa J.B., et al. TCR peptide MHC interactions in situ show accelerated kinetics and increased affinity. Nature 2010, 463:963-967.
29. Robert P., et al. Kinetics and mechanics of two-dimensional interactions between T cell receptors and different activating ligands. Biophys. J. 2012, 102:248-257.
30. van der Merwe P.A., Cordoba S.P. Late arrival: recruiting coreceptors to the T cell receptor complex. Immunity 2011, 34:1-3.
31. Xu C., et al. Regulation of T cell receptor activation by dynamic membrane binding of the CD3epsilon cytoplasmic tyrosine-based motif. Cell 2008, 135:702-713.
32. Zhang H., et al. Basic residues in the T-cell receptor ζ cytoplasmic domain mediate membrane association and modulate signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:19323-19328.
33. van der Merwe P.A., et al. Why do some T cell receptor cytoplasmic domains associate with the plasma membrane?. Front. Immunol. 2012, 3:29.
34. Jiang N., et al. Two-stage cooperative T cell receptor-peptide major histocompatibility complex-CD8 trimolecular interactions amplify antigen discrimination. Immunity 2011, 34:13-23.
35. Sage P.T., et al. Antigen recognition is facilitated by invadosome-like protrusions formed by memory/effector T cells. J. Immunol. 2012, 188:3686-3699.
36. Kumari S., et al. T cell antigen receptor activation and actin cytoskeleton remodeling. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1838:546-556.
37. Gopalakrishnan M., et al. Effects of receptor clustering on ligand dissociation kinetics: theory and simulations. Biophys. J. 2005, 89:3686-3700.
38. Andrews S.S. Serial rebinding of ligands to clustered receptors as exemplified by bacterial chemotaxis. Phys. Biol. 2005, 2:111-122.
39. Wu Y., et al. Transforming binding affinities from three dimensions to two with application to cadherin clustering. Nature 2011, 475:510-513.
40. Mugler A., et al. Membrane clustering and the role of rebinding in biochemical signaling. Biophys. J. 2012, 102:1069-1078.
41. Huse M., et al. Spatial and temporal dynamics of T cell receptor signaling with a photoactivatable agonist. Immunity 2007, 27:76-88.
42. Allard J.F., et al. Mechanical modulation of receptor-ligand interactions at cell-cell interfaces. Biophys. J. 2012, 102:1265-1273.
43. van der Merwe P.A., Dushek O. Mechanisms for T cell receptor triggering. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 11:47-55.