Comparative effectiveness of 3-dimensional vs 2-dimensional and high-definition vs standard-definition neuroendoscopy: A preclinical randomized crossover study

Neurosurgery

Volumn 74, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 375-380

  Marcus, Hani J ^a,b   Hughes Hallett, Archie ^b   Cundy, Thomas P ^b   Di Marco, Aimee ^b   Pratt, Philip ^b   Nandi, Dipankar ^a   Darzi, Ara ^b   Yang, Guang Zhong ^b  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

3 dimensional; 3D; Endoscopy; HD; High definition; Minimally invasive neurosurgery

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HIGH DEFINITION NEUROENDOSCOPY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; LIKERT SCALE; MALE; NEUROENDOSCOPY; NEUROLOGICAL ENDOSCOPE; NEUROSURGEON; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; STANDARD DEFINITION NEUROENDOSCOPY; TASK PERFORMANCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL NEUROENDOSCOPY; TWO DIMENSIONAL NEUROENDOSCOPY; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; WORKLOAD; ANATOMIC MODEL; BRAIN; CONTROLLED STUDY; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGERY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; BRAIN; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MODELS, ANATOMIC; NEUROENDOSCOPY;

EID: 84897443582     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000249     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Hsu W, Li KW, Bookland M, Jallo GI. Keyhole to the brain: Walter Dandy and neuroendoscopy. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009;3(5):439-442.
2. Buess GF, van Bergen P, Kunert W, Schurr MO. Comparative study of various 2-D and 3-D vision systems in minimally invasive surgery [in German]. Chirurg. 1996;67(10):1041-1046.
3. LaGrange CA, Clark CJ, Gerber EW, Strup SE. Evaluation of three laparoscopic modalities: robotics versus three-dimensional vision laparoscopy versus standard laparoscopy. J Endourol. 2008;22(3):511-516.
4. Taffinder N, Smith SG, Huber J, Russell RC, Darzi A. The effect of a second-generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons. Surg Endosc. 1999;13(11):1087-1092.
5. Kong SH, Oh BM, Yoon H, et al. Comparison of two-and three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic performance: a novel 3D system with one camera. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(5):1132-1143.
6. Blavier A, Gaudissart Q, Cadiere GB, Nyssen AS. Impact of 2D and 3D vision on performance of novice subjects using da Vinci robotic system. Acta Chir Belg. 2006;106(6):662-664.
7. Schroeder HW, Nehlsen M. Value of high-definition imaging in neuroendoscopy. Neurosurg Rev. 2009;32(3):303-308; discussion 308.
8. Fraser JF, Allen B, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Three-dimensional neuroster-eoendoscopy: subjective and objective comparison to 2D. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2009;52(1):25-31.
9. Conrad J, Philipps M, Oertel J. High-definition imaging in endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011;25(1):e13-e17.
10. Marcus HJ, Seneci CA, Payne CJ, Nandi D, Darzi A, Yang GZ. Robotics in keyhole transcranial endoscope-assisted microsurgery: a critical review of existing systems and proposed specifications for new robotic platforms [published August 5, 2013]. Neurosurgery. doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000123.
11. Tabaee A, Anand VK, Fraser JF, Brown SM, Singh A, Schwartz TH. Three-dimensional endoscopic pituitary surgery. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(5 suppl 2):288-293; discussion 294-295.
12. Roth J, Fraser JF, Singh A, Bernardo A, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Surgical approaches to the orbital apex: comparison of endoscopic endonasal and transcranial approaches using a novel 3D endoscope. Orbit. 2011;30 (1):43-48.
13. Roth J, Singh A, Nyquist G, et al. Three-dimensional and 2-dimensional endoscopic exposure of midline cranial base targets using expanded endonasal and transcranial approaches. Neurosurgery. 2009;65(6):1116-1128; discussion 1128-1130.
14. Castelnuovo P, Battaglia P, Bignami M, et al. Endoscopic transnasal resection of anterior skull base malignancy with a novel 3D endoscope and neuronavigation. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2012;32(3):189-191.
15. Kari E, Oyesiku NM, Dadashev V, Wise SK. Comparison of traditional 2-dimensional endoscopic pituitary surgery with new 3-dimensional endoscopic technology: intraoperative and early postoperative factors. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2012;2(1):2-8.
16. Hart SG, Staveland LE. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Peter AH, Najmedin M, eds. Advances in Psychology. Vol 52. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North-Holland; 1988:139-183.
17. Storz P, Buess GF, Kunert W, Kirschniak A. 3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(5):1454- 1460.
18. Barkhoudarian G, Romero AD, Laws ER. Evaluation of the three-dimensional endoscope in transsphenoidal surgery. Neurosurgery. 2013;73(1 suppl Operative): ons74-ons78; discussion ons78-ons79.
19. Steele KM, Brigner WL, Adkins A. Perceived depth from simultaneous changes in length and direction of a single line. Percept Mot Skills. 1995;80(2):579-584.
20. Mather G, Smith DR. Depth cue integration: stereopsis and image blur. Vision Res. 2000;40(25):3501-3506.
21. O'Shea RP, Blackburn SG, Ono H. Contrast as a depth cue. Vision Res. 1994;34 (12):1595-1604.
22. Rogers B. Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception: a retrospective. Perception. 2009;38(6):907-911.
23. Voorhorst FA, Overbeeke KJ, Smets GJ. Using movement parallax for 3D laparoscopy. Med Prog Through Technol. 1996;21(4):211-218.
24. van Bergen P, Kunert W, Buess GF. The effect of high-definition imaging on surgical task efficiency in minimally invasive surgery: an experimental comparison between three-dimensional imaging and direct vision through a stereoscopic TEM rectoscope. Surg Endosc. 2000;14(1):71-74.
25. Derossis AM, Fried GM, Abrahamowicz M, Sigman HH, Barkun JS, Meakins JL. Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg. 1998;175(6):482-487.
26. Shah J, Buckley D, Frisby J, Darzi A. Depth cue reliance in surgeons and medical students. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(9):1472-1474.