Evaluation of three laparoscopic modalities robotics versus three-dimensional vision laparoscopy versus standard laparoscopy

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 511-516

  Lagrange, Chad A ^a,b   Clark, Curtis J ^a   Gerber, Eric W ^a   Strup, Stephen E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b MS 283 ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANNULATION; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOTICS; SIMULATOR; STANDARD LAPAROSCOPY; TASK PERFORMANCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL VISION LAPAROSCOPY;

ADULT; FACULTY, MEDICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LAPAROSCOPES; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR SKILLS; ROBOTICS; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 41149088826     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2007.0241     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Hasson HM, Kumari NA, Eekhout J. Training simulator for developing laparoscopic skills. JSLS 2001;5:255-265.
2. Hasson HM, Schollmyer T, Vanhecke K, Kumari NA, Eeckhout J. Experience with the Laparoscopy Training Simulator 2000 (LTS2000). Abstracts of the 30th Annual Meeting of the AAGL. San Francisco, November 2001. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2001;8:S24.
3. Fichera A, Prachan V, Kives S, Levine R, Hasson HM. Physical reality simulation for training of laparoscopists in the 21st century: A multi-specialty and multi-institutional study. Presented at SAGES, April 2004. JSLS 2005;9:125-129.
4. Mueller-Richter UD, Limberger A, Weber P, Ruprecht KW, Spitzer W, Schilling M. Possibilities and limitations of current stereoendoscopy. Surg Endosc 2004;18:942-947.
5. Pietrzak P, Arya M, Joseph JV, Patel H. Three-dimensional visualization in laparoscopic surgery. BJU Int 2006;98:253-256.
6. Van Bergen P, Kunert W, Bessell J, Buess GF. Comparative study of two-dimensional and three-dimensional vision systems for minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc 1998;12:948-954.
7. Taffinder N, Smith SG, Huber J, Russell RC, Darzi A. The effect of a second-generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons. Surg Endosc 1999;12:1087-1092.
8. Tevaearai HT, Mueller XM, von Segesser LK. 3-D vision improves performance in a pelvic trainer. Endoscopy 2000;32:464-468.
9. Guru KA, Kuvshinoff BW, Pavlov-Shapiro S, Bienko MB, Aftab MN, Brady WE, Mohler JL. Impact of robotics and laparoscopy on surgical skills: A comparative study. J Am Coll Surg 2007;204:96-101.
10. Hubens G, Coveliers, Balliu L, Ruppert M, Vaneerdeweg W. A performance study comparing manual and robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery using the da Vinci system. Surg Endosc 2003;17:1595-1599.
11. Byrn JC, Schluender S, Divino CM, Conrad J, Gurland B, Shlasko E, Szold A. Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical performance for both novice and experienced operators using the da Vinci robot system. Am J Surg 2007;193:519-522.
12. Badani KK, Bhandari A, Tewari A, Menon M. Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional suturing: Is there a difference in a robotic surgery setting? J Endourol 2005;19:1212-1215.
13. Bholat OS, Haluck RS, Murray WB, Gorman PJ, Krummel TM. Tactile feedback is present during minimally invasive surgery. J Am Coll Surg 1999;189:349-355.
14. Tholey G, Desai JP, Castellanos AE. Force feedback plays a significant role in minimally invasive surgery. Ann Surg 2005;241:102-109.