Three-dimensional neurostereoendoscopy: Subjective and objective comparison to 2D

Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 25-31

  Fraser, J F ^a   Allen, B ^a   Anand, V K ^a   Schwartz, T H ^a,b  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

3D; Endonasal; Endoscope; Stereoendoscope; Surgical simulators; Three dimensional; Transnasal

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NEUROENDOSCOPY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SKULL BASE; SKULL SURGERY; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; THREE DIMESIONAL NEUROSTEREOENDOSCOPY; TWO DIMENSIONAL NEUROSTEREOENDOSCOPY; BIOASSAY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; NEUROSURGERY; STEREOTACTIC PROCEDURE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ENDPOINT DETERMINATION; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; NEUROENDOSCOPY; NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRES; SKULL BASE; STEREOTAXIC TECHNIQUES;

EID: 65449145206     PISSN: 09467211     EISSN: 14392291     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1104567     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Badani KK , Bhandari A , Tewari A et al. Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional suturing: is there a difference in a robotic surgery setting? J Endourol 2005; 19: 1212-1215
2. Tafnder N, Smith SG, Huber J et al. The effect of a second-generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons. Surg Endosc 1999; 13: 1087-1092
3. Chen JC, Levy ML, Corber Z et al. Concurrent three dimensional neuroendoscopy: initial descriptions of application to clinical practice. Neurosurg Focus 1999; 6: e12
4. Perez-Cruet MJ, Fessler RG, Perin NI. Review: complications of minimally invasive spinal surgery. Neurosurgery 2002; 51: S26-36
5. Tirakotai W, Bozinov O, Sure U et al. The evolution of stereotactic guidance in neuroendoscopy. Childs Nerv Syst 2004; 20: 790-795
6. Blavier A, Gaudissart Q, Cadiere GB et al. Comparison of learning curves and skill transfer between classical and robotic laparoscopy according to the viewing conditions: implications for training. Am J Surg 2007; 194: 115-121
7. Chan AC, Chung SC, Yim AP et al. Comparison of two-dimensional vs. three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 1997; 11: 438-440
8. Couldwell WT, Weiss MH, Rabb C et al. Variations on the standard transsphenoidal approach to the sellar region, with emphasis on the extended approaches and parasellar approaches: surgical experience in 105 cases. Neurosurgery 2004; 55: 539-547
9. Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Practical Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2007
10. Cavallo LM, Messina A, Cappabianca P et al. Endoscopic endonasal surgery of the midline skull base: anatomical study and clinical considerations. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 19: E2
11. Kassam A, Gardner P, Snyderman C et al. Expanded endonasal approach: fully endoscopic, completely transnasal approach to the middle third of the clivus, petrous bone, middle cranial fossa, and infratemporal fossa. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 19: E6
12. Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A et al. Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part 1. Crista galli to the sella turcica. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 19: E3
13. Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A et al. Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part II. Posterior clinoids to the foramen magnum. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 19: E4
14. Jho HD, Ha HG. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: part 1 - the midline anterior fossa skull base. Minim Invas Neurosurg 2004; 47: 1-8
15. Jho HD, Ha HG. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: part 2 - the cavernous sinus. Minim Invas Neurosurg 2004; 47: 9-15
16. Jho HD, Ma H-G. Endosopic endonasal skull base surgery: part 3 - the clivus and posterior fossa. Minim Invas Neurosurg 2005; 47: 16-23
17. Laufer I, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Endonasal endoscopic extended transsphenoidal, transplanum approach for suprasellar lesions. J Neurosurg 2007; 106: 400-406
18. Laufer I, Greenfield JP, Anand VK et al. Endonasal endoscopic resection of the odontoid in a non-achondroplastic dwarf with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Feasibility of the approach and utility of intraoperative iso-C 3D navigation. J Neurosurg [in press]
19. Frank G, Pasquini E, Doglietto F et al. The endoscopic extended transsphenoidal approach for craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurgery 2006; 59: ONS75-ONS83
20. Schwartz TH, Fraser JF, Brown S et al. Endoscopic skull base surgery. Classi cation of operative approaches. Neurosurgery [in press]
21. Wong GK, Zhu CX, Ahuja AT et al. Craniotomy and clipping of intracranial aneurysm in a stereoscopic virtual reality environment. Neurosurgery 2007; 61: 564-568; discussion 568-569
22. Anil SM, Kato Y, Hayakawa M et al. Virtual 3-dimensional preoperative planning with the dextroscope for excision of a 4th ventricular ependymoma. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2007; 50: 65-70
23. Levy ML, Chen JC, Moffitt K et al. Stereoscopic head-mounted display incorporated into microsurgical procedures: technical note. Neurosurgery 1998; 43: 392-395; discussion 395-396
24. Votanopoulos K, Brunicardi FC, Thornby J et al. Impact of three-dimensional vision in laparoscopic training. World J Surg 2008; 32: 110-118
25. Brown S TA, Singh A, Schwartz TH et al. Three-dimensional endoscopic sinus surgery: feasibility and technical aspects. Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery 2008 [in press]