CoDNaS: A database of conformational diversity in the native state of proteins

Bioinformatics

Volumn 29, Issue 19, 2013, Pages 2512-2514

  Monzon, Alexander Miguel ^a   Juritz, Ezequiel ^a   Fornasari, María Silvina ^a   Parisi, Gustavo ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE QUILMES   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIGAND; PROTEIN;

CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; INTERNET; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY; ARTICLE;

DATABASES, PROTEIN; INTERNET; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN;

EID: 84897366399     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt405     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Altschul,S.F. et al. (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol., 215, 403-410.
2. Ashburner,M. et al. (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet., 25, 25-29.
3. Berman,H.M. (2000) The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 235-242.
4. Best,R.B. et al. (2006) Relation between native ensembles and experimental structures of proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 10901-10906.
5. Boehr,D.D. et al. (2010) The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition. Nat. Chem. Biol., 5, 789-796.
6. Di Domenico,T. et al. (2012) MobiDB: a comprehensive database of intrinsic protein disorder annotations. Bioinformatics, 28, 2080-2081.
7. Greene,L.H. et al. (2007) The CATH domain structure database: new protocols and classification levels give a more comprehensive resource for exploring evolution. Nucleic Acids Res., 35, D291-D297.
8. Jain,E. et al. (2009) Infrastructure for the life sciences: design and implementation of the UniProt website. BMC Bioinformatics, 10, 136.
9. Juritz,E. et al. (2012) On the effect of protein conformation diversity in discriminating among neutral and disease related single amino acid substitutions. BMC Genomics, 13 (Suppl. 4), S5.
10. Juritz,E. et al. (2013) Protein conformational diversity modulates sequence divergence. Mol. Biol. Evol., 30, 79-87.
11. Juritz,E.I. et al. (2011) PCDB: a database of protein conformational diversity. Nucleic Acids Res., 39, D475-D479.
12. Kotera,M. et al. (2004) Computational assignment of the EC numbers for genomicscale analysis of enzymatic reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 126, 16487-16498.
13. Kumar,S. et al. (2000) Folding and binding cascades: dynamic landscapes and population shifts. Protein Sci., 9, 10-19.
14. Kuzu,G. et al. (2013) Exploiting conformational ensembles in modeling protein-protein interactions on the proteome scale. J. Proteome Res., 12, 2641-2653.
15. McLachlan,A.D. (1982) Rapid comparison of protein structures. Acta Crystallogr. A, 38, 871-873.
16. Nussinov,R. and Ma,B. (2012) Protein dynamics and conformational selection in bidirectional signal transduction. BMC Biol., 10, 2.
17. Ortiz,A.R. et al. (2002) MAMMOTH (matching molecular models obtained from theory): an automated method for model comparison. Protein Sci., 11, 2606-2621.
18. Osguthorpe,D.J. et al. (2012) Generation of receptor structural ensembles for virtual screening using binding site shape analysis and clustering. Chem Biol Drug Des., 80, 182-193.
19. Petruk,A.A. et al. (2013) Molecular dynamics simulations provide atomistic insight into hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry experiments. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 9, 658-669.
20. Tsai,C.J. et al. (1999) Folding funnels, binding funnels, and protein function. Protein Sci., 8, 1181-1190.
21. Velankar,S. et al. (2005) E-MSD: an integrated data resource for bioinformatics. Nucleic Acids Res., 33, D262-D265.
22. Zhang,Y. and Skolnick,J. (2004) Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins, 57, 702-710.