Integrating the study of within-and between-person variability in personality at work

Personality and Individual Differences: Theory, Assessment, and Application

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 11-20

  Beckmann, Nadin ^a   Minbashian, Amirali ^a   Wood, Robert E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Experience sampling; Five factor model; Organisational psychology; Personality; Within person variability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897264736     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (37)

1. Barrick, M. R. & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
2. Barrick, M. R. & Mount, M. K. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 111-118.
3. Barrick, M. R. & Mount, M. K. (2005). Yes, personality matters: Moving on to more important matters. Human Performance, 18, 359-372.
4. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9-30.
5. Beckmann, N., Wood, R.E., & Minbashian, A. (2009, 25-28 November). It depends how you look at it-on the relationship between conscientiousness and neuroticism. Paper presented at the 8th Australian Conference on Personality and Individual Differences, Sydney, Australia.
6. Beckmann, N., Wood, R.E., & Minbashian, A. (in press). It depends how you look at it: On the relationship between conscientiousness and neuroticism at the within-and betweenperson levels of analysis. Journal of Research in Personality.
7. Borkenau, P. & Ostendorf, F. (1998). The Big Five states: How useful is the Five-Factor Model to describe intraindividual variation over time? Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 202-221.
8. Borkenau, P., Egloff, B., Eid, M., Henning, J., Kersting, M., Neubauer, A. C., & Spinath, F. M. (2005). Persönlichkeitspsychologie: Stand und Perspektiven [Personality psychology: Current state and future prospects]. Psychologische Rundschau, 56, 271-290.
9. Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review,110, 203-219.
10. Cervone, D. (2005). Personality Architecture: Within-person structures and processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 423-452.
11. Cervone, D. (2004). The architecture of personality. Psychological Review, 111, 183-204.
12. Cervone, D., Shadel, W. G., Smith, R.E., & Fiori, M. (2006). Self-regulation: Suggestions and reminders from personality science. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55, 333-385.
13. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
14. Feldman Barrett, L. & Barrett, D. J. (2001). An introduction to computerized experience sampling in psychology. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 175-185.
15. Fisher, C. & Noble, Ch. S. (2004). A within-person examination of correlates of performance and emotions while working. Human Performance, 17, 145-168.
16. Fisher, C. D. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of real-time affective reactions at work. Motivation and Emotion, 26, 3-30.
17. Fleeson, W. & Jolley, S. (2006). The challenge and the opportunity of intraindividual variability: A theory of human flexibility. In D. Mroczek & T. D. Little (Eds.). Handbook of personality development (pp.41-60). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Fleeson, W. (2001). Towards a structure-and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011-1027.
19. Hofmann, D. A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23, 723-744.
20. Ilies R. & Judge, T. A. (2002). Understanding the dynamic relationships among personality, mood, and job satisfaction: A field experience sampling study, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 1119-1139.
21. Ilies, R., Scott, B. A., & Judge, T. A. (2006). The interactive effects of personal traits and experienced states on intraindividual patterns of citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 561-575.
22. Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-Factor Model of personality and job satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 530-541.
23. Matthews, G. & Deary, I. J. (1998). Personality traits. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. McCrae R. R. & Costa P. T., Jr. (1999). A Five-Factor Theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin and O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp.139-155). New York: Guilford.
25. Minbashian, A., Wood, R. E., & Beckmann, N. (in press). Task-contingent conscientiousness as a unit of personality at work. Journal of Applied Psychology
26. Minbashian, A., Wood, R. E., & Beckmann, N. (2009). Contingent beliefs as predictors of within-person variation in conscientiousness at work. In George T. Solomon (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management (CD), ISSN 1543-8643.
27. Miner, A. G., Glomb, T. M., & Hulin, C. (2005). Experience sampling mood and its correlates at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 171-193.
28. Mischel, W. & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268.
29. Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252-283.
30. Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., Scullen, S. M., & Rounds, J. (2005). Higher-order dimension of the Big Five personality traits and the Big Six vocational interest types. Personnel Psychology, 58, 447-478.
31. Nezlek, J.B. (2001). Multilevel random coefficient analyses of event-and interval-contingent data in social and personality psychology research. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 771-785.
32. Nezlek, J. B. (2007). A multilevel framework for understanding relationships among traits, states, situations and behaviours. European Journal of Personality, 21, 789-810.
33. Payne, S. C., Youngcourt, S. S., & Beaubien, J. M. (2007). A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 128-150.
34. Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
35. Schmitz, B. (2006). Advantages of studying processes in educational research. Learning and Instruction, 16, 433-449.
36. Vancouver, J. B., Thompson, Ch. M., & Williams, A. A. (2001). The changing signs in the relationships among self-efficacy, personal goals, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 605-620.
37. Vancouver, J. B. & Kendall, L. N. (2006). When self-efficacy negatively relates to motivation and performance in a learning context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1146-1153.