Long-term improvement of speech perception with the fine structure processing coding strategy in cochlear implants

ORL

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 36-43

  Kleine Punte, Andrea ^a   De Bodt, Marc ^a   Van De Heyning, Paul ^a  

^a ANTWERP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Audio processor upgrade; Cochlear implants; Coding strategies; Fine structure processing; Opus 2; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CODING; FINE STRUCTURE PROCESSING CODING STRATEGY; FOLLOW UP; HEARING; HUMAN; NOISE; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCHOOL CHILD; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH SPATIAL AND QUALITIES QUESTIONNAIRE; AUDIOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEAFNESS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUDIOMETRY; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84897118889     PISSN: 03011569     EISSN: 14230275     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000360479     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Wolford RD, Eddington DK, Rabinowitz WM: Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 1991; 352: 236-238. (Pubitemid 21912323)
2. Schatzer R, Krenmayr A, Au DK, Kals M, Zierhofer C: Temporal fine structure in cochlear implants: preliminary speech perception results in Cantonese-speaking implant users. Acta Otolaryngol 2010; 130: 1031-1039.
3. Riss D, Hamzavi JS, Selberherr A, Kaider A, Blineder M, Starlinger V, Gstoettner W, Arnoldner C: Envelope versus fine structure speech coding strategy: a crossover study. Otol Neurotol 2011; 32: 1094-1101.
4. Lorens A, Zgoda M, Obrycka A, Skarzynski H: Fine structure processing improves speech perception as well as objective and subjective benefits in pediatric MED-EL COMBI 40+ users. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 74: 1372-1378.
5. Riss D, Hamzavi JS, Katzinger M, Baumgartner WD, Kaider A, Gstoettner W, Arnoldner C: Effects of fine structure and extended low frequencies in pediatric cochlear implant recipients. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 75: 573-578.
6. Muller J, Brill S, Hagen R, Moeltner A, Brockmeier SJ, Stark T, Helbig S, Maurer J, Zahnert T, Zierhofer C, Nopp P, Anderson I: Clinical trial results with the MED-EL fine structure processing coding strategy in experienced cochlear implant users. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2012; 74: 185-198.
7. Magnusson L: Comparison of the fine structure processing (FSP) strategy and the CIS strategy used in the MED-EL cochlear implant system: speech intelligibility and music sound quality. Int J Audiol 2011; 50: 279-287.
8. Vermeire K, Kleine Punte A, Van de Heyning P: Better speech recognition in noise with the fine structure processing coding strategy. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2010; 72: 305-311.
9. van Wieringen A, Wouters J: LIST and LINT: sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands. Int J Audiol 2008; 47: 348-355. (Pubitemid 351998880)
10. Gatehouse S, Noble W: The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol 2004; 43: 85-99. (Pubitemid 38295489)
11. Riss D, Arnoldner C, Reiss S, Baumgartner WD, Hamzavi JS: 1-year results using the Opus speech processor with the fine structure speech coding strategy. Acta Otolaryngol 2009; 129: 988-991.
12. Seebens Y, Diller G: Improvements in speech perception after the upgrade from the TEMPO+ to the OPUS 2 audio processor. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2012; 74: 6-11.
13. Nilsson M, Soli SD, Sullivan JA: Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95: 1085-1099. (Pubitemid 24056373)
14. Hallgren M, Larsby B, Arlinger S: A Swedish version of the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) for measurement of speech recognition. Int J Audiol 2006; 45: 227-237.