Better speech recognition in noise with the fine structure processing coding strategy

ORL

Volumn 72, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 305-311

  Vermeire, Katrien ^a   Punte, Andrea Kleine ^b   Van De Heyning, Paul ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

^b ANTWERP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Fine structure; Speech coding strategy; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CODING; FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; HEARING ACUITY; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; NOISE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCHOOL CHILD; SOUND INTENSITY; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHILD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOFTWARE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77956581342     PISSN: 03011569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000319748     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Firszt JB, Holden LK, Reeder RM, Skinner MW: Speech recognition in cochlear implant recipients: Comparison of standard HiRes and HiRes 120 sound processing. Otol Neurotol 2009; 30: 146-152.
2. Pasanisi E, Bacciu A, Vincenti V, Guida M, Berghenti MT, Barbot A, Panu F, Bacciu S: Comparison of speech perception benefits with SPEAK and ACE coding strategies in pediatric Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant recipients. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2002; 64: 159-163. (Pubitemid 34603743)
3. Zierhofer C: Electrical nerve stimulation based on channel-specific sequences. World Patent WO 01/13991 A1, 2001.
4. Hochmair I, Nopp P, Jolly C, Schmidt M, Schösser H, Garnham C, Anderson I: MEDEL cochlear implants: State of the art and a glimpse into the future. Trends Amplif 2006; 10: 201-219. (Pubitemid 44934660)
5. Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Wolford RD, Eddington DK, Rabinowitz WM: Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 1991; 352: 236-238.
6. Eddington DK: Speech discrimination in deaf patients with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 68: 885-891. (Pubitemid 11221626)
7. Merzenich MM, Rebscher SJ, Loeb GE, Byers CL, Schindler RA: The UCSF cochlear implant project. Adv Audiol 1984;2: 119-144.
8. White MW, Merzenich MM, Gardi JN: Multichannel cochlear implants: Channel interactions and processor design. Arch Otolaryngol 1984; 110: 493-501. (Pubitemid 14092658)
9. Hilbert D: Grundzüge einer allgemeinen Theorie der linearen Integralgleichungen. Leipzig, Teubner, 1912.
10. Arnoldner C, Riss D, Brunner M, Durisin M, Baumgartner WD, Hamzavi JS: Speech and music perception with the new fine structure speech coding strategy: Preliminary results. Acta Otolaryngol 2007; 127: 1298-1303. (Pubitemid 350175283)
11. Riss D, Arnoldner C, Reiss S, Baumgartner WD, Hamzavi JS: 1 year results using the Opus speech processor with the fine structure speech coding strategy. Acta Otolaryngol 2008;Dec 3:1-4. [E-pub ahead of print].
12. Riss D, Arnoldner C, Baumgartner WD, Kaider A, Hamzavi JS: A new fine structure speech coding strategy: Speech perception at a reduced number of channels. Otol Neurotol 2008; 29: 784-788.
13. Schatzer R, Krenmayr A, Au DK, Kals M, Zierhofer C: Temporal fine structure in cochlear implants: Preliminary speech perception results in Cantonese-speaking implant users. Acta Otolaryngol 2010, E-pub ahead of print.
14. Van Wieringen A, Wouters J: LIST and LINT: Sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands. Int J Audiol 2008; 47: 348-355. (Pubitemid 351998880)
15. Plomp R, Mimpen AM: Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology 1979; 18: 43-52. (Pubitemid 9111887)
16. Nilsson M, Soli SD, Sullivan JA: Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95: 1085-1099. (Pubitemid 24056373)
17. Gatehouse S, Noble W: The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol 2004; 43: 85-99. (Pubitemid 38295489)
18. Hamzavi J, Baumgartner WD, Pok SM, Franz P, Gstoettner W: Variables affecting speech perception in postlingually deaf adults following cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 2003; 123: 493-498. (Pubitemid 36609767)
19. Tyler RS, Parkinson AJ, Woodworth GG, Lowder MW, Gantz BJ: Performance over time of adult patients using the Ineraid or Nucleus cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 102: 508-522.