Comparison of Forsus FRD EZ and Andresen activator in the treatment of class II, division 1 malocclusions

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 445-451

  Bilgiç, Fundagül ^a   Başaran, Güvenç ^b   Hamamci, Orhan ^b  

^a MUSTAFA KEMAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b DICLE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Andresen activator; Class II malocclusion; Forsus FRD EZ; Functional treatment

Indexed keywords

CASE CONTROL STUDY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE;

ACTIVATOR APPLIANCES; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; HUMANS; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II;

EID: 84897118208     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-014-1237-y     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ingerval B (1974) Prevalence of dental and occlusal anomalies in Swedish conscripts. Acta Odont Scand 32:83–92
2. Kim YH (1979) A comparative cephalometric study of class II div 1 nonextraction and extraction cases. Angle Orthod 49:77–84
3. Ackerman JL, Proffit WR (1969) The characteristic of malocclusion: a modem approach to classification and diagnosis. Am J Orthod 56:443–454
4. McNamara JA (1981) Components of class II malocclusion in children 8–10 years of age. Angle Orthod 51:177–202
5. McNamara JA Jr, Ellis E (1988) Cephalometric analysis of untreated adults with ideal facial and occlusal relationships. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 3:221–231
6. Franchi L, Baccetti T (2006) Prediction of individual mandibular changes induced by functional jaw orthopedics followed by fixed appliances in class II patients. Angle Orthod 76:950–954
7. Moore RN, Igel KA, Boice PA (1989) Vertical and horizontal components of functional appliance therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 96:433–443
8. Bishara SE, Ziaja RR (1989) Functional appliances: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 95:250–258
9. Woodside DG (1998) Do functional appliances have an orthopedic effect? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113:11–14
10. Graber TM, Rakosi T, Petrovic AG (1997) Dentofacial orthopedics with functional appliances. Mosby, St louis
11. Graber TM, Neumann B (1977) Removable orthodontic appliances. Saunders, Philadelphia
12. Ahlgren J, Laurin C (1976) Late results of activator-treatment: cephalometric study. Br J Orthod 3:181–187
13. Malmgren O, Omblus J (1985) Treatment with an orthopaedic appliance system. Eur J Orthod 7:205–214
14. Wahl N (2006) Orthodontics in 3 millennia: Chapter 9. Functional appliances to midcentury. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 129:829–833
15. Lorenzo F, Lisa A, Veronica G, Caterina M, Efisio D, Tiziano B (2011) Effectiveness of comprehensive fixed appliance treatment used with the Forsus fatigue resistant device in class II patients. Angle Orthod 81:678–683
16. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr (2002) An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of mandibular growth. Angle Orthod 72:316–323
17. Pancherz H (1982) The mechanism of class II correction in Herbst Appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 82:104–113
18. Pancherz H (1984) A cephalometric analysis of skeletal and dental changes contributing to class II correction in activator treatment. Am J Orthod 85:125–134
19. Dahlberg G (1940) Statistical methods formedical and biological students. Allen & Unwin, London
20. Karacay S, Akin E, Olmez H, Gurton AU, Sagdic D (2006) Forsus Nitinol flat spring and Jasper Jumper corrections of class II division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod 76:666–672
21. Cope JB, Buschang PH, Cope DD, Parker J, Blackwood HO (1994) Quantitative evaluation of craniofacial changes with Jasper Jumper therapy. Angle Orthod 64:113–122
22. Covell DA Jr, Trammell DW, Boero RP, West R (1999) A cephalometric study of class II division 1 malocclusions treated with the Jasper Jumper appliance. Angle Orthod 69:311–320
23. Nalbantgil D, Arun T, Sayinsu K, Isık F (2005) Skeletal, dental and soft-tissue changes induced by the Jasper Jumper appliance in late adolescence. Angle Orthod 75:426–436
24. Stucki N, Ingervall B (1998) The use of the Jasper Jumper for the correction of class II malocclusion in the young permanent dentition. Eur J Orthod 20:271–281
25. Bilgic F, Hamamci O, Basaran G (2011) Comparison of the effects of fixed and removable functional appliances on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures. Aust Orthod J 27:110–116
26. Turkkahraman H, Sayin MÖ (2006) Effects of activator and activator headgear treatment: comparison with untreated class II subjects. Eur J Orthod 28:27–34
27. Forsberg CM, Odenrick L (1981) Skeletal and soft tissue response to activator treatment. Eur J Orthod 3:67–74
28. Cozza P, De Toffol L, Colagrossi S (2004) Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes during activator therapy. Eur J Orthod 26:293–302
29. De Almeida MR, Henriques JF, de Almeida RR, Weber U, McNamara JA Jr (2005) Short-term treatment effects produced by the Herbst Appliance in the mixed dentition. Angle Orthod 75:540–547
30. Basciftci FA, Uysal T, Büyükerman A, Sarı Z (2003) The effects of activator treatment on the craniofacial structures of class II division 1 patients. Eur J Orthod 25:87–93
31. Kucukkeles N, Ilhan I, Orgun IA (2007) Treatment efficiency in skeletal class II patients treated with the Jasper jumper. Angle Orthod 77:449–456