Glutathione S-transferase iso-enzymes in perfusate from pumped kidneys are associated with delayed graft function

American Journal of Transplantation

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 886-896

  Hall, I E ^a   Bhangoo, R S ^b   Reese, P P ^c   Doshi, M D ^d   Weng, F L ^e   Hong, K ^a   Lin, H ^a   Han, G ^a   Hasz, R D ^f   Goldstein, M J ^g   Schroppel B ^g,h   Parikh, C R ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^d WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Barnabas Health Services   (United States)

^f Gift of Life Institute   (United States)

^g MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biomarker; ischemia; kidney injury; perfusion pumping

Indexed keywords

GLUTATHIONE TRANSFERASE; BIOLOGICAL MARKER; GLUTATHIONE S-TRANSFERASE ALPHA; GLUTATHIONE TRANSFERASE P1; ISOENZYME;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION; FEMALE; GRAFT PERFUSION; GRAFT RECIPIENT; HUMAN; KIDNEY ALLOGRAFT; KIDNEY DONOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPLICATION; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; ENZYMOLOGY; FOLLOW UP; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; KIDNEY FUNCTION TEST; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; METABOLISM; PERFUSION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROGNOSIS; RISK FACTOR;

BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION; ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE; GLUTATHIONE S-TRANSFERASE PI; GLUTATHIONE TRANSFERASE; HUMANS; ISOENZYMES; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; KIDNEY FUNCTION TESTS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERFUSION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84897113723     PISSN: 16006135     EISSN: 16006143     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12635     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Louvar DW, Li N, Snyder J, Peng Y, Kasiske BL, Israni AK., " Nature versus nurture" study of deceased-donor pairs in kidney transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 20: 1351-1358.
2. Jochmans I, Pirenne J., Graft quality assessment in kidney transplantation: Not an exact science yet. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2011; 16: 174-179.
3. Hassanain M, Tchervenkov J, Cantarovich M, et al. Delayed graft function has an equally bad impact on deceased donor renal graft survival in both standard criteria donors and expanded criteria donors. Transplant Proc 2009; 41: 133-134.
4. Rao PS, Ojo A., The alphabet soup of kidney transplantation: SCD, DCD, ECD-Fundamentals for the practicing nephrologist. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 4: 1827-1831.
5. Marcen R, Orofino L, Pascual J, et al. Delayed graft function does not reduce the survival of renal transplant allografts. Transplantation 1998; 66: 461-466.
6. Locke JE, Segev DL, Warren DS, Dominici F, Simpkins CE, Montgomery RA., Outcomes of kidneys from donors after cardiac death: Implications for allocation and preservation. Am J Transplant 2007; 7: 1797-1807.
7. Singh RP, Farney AC, Rogers J, et al. Kidney transplantation from donation after cardiac death donors: Lack of impact of delayed graft function on post-transplant outcomes. Clin Transplant 2011; 25: 255-264.
8. Yarlagadda SG, Coca SG, Formica RN Jr, Poggio ED, Parikh CR., Association between delayed graft function and allograft and patient survival: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009; 24: 1039-1047.
9. Shoskes DA, Halloran PF., Delayed graft function in renal transplantation: Etiology, management and long-term significance. J Urol 1996; 155: 1831-1840.
10. Bond M, Pitt M, Akoh J, Moxham T, Hoyle M, Anderson R., The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of methods of storing donated kidneys from deceased donors: A systematic review and economic model. Health Technol Assess 2009; 13: 1-156.
11. Moers C, Smits JM, Maathuis M-HJ, et al. Machine perfusion or cold storage in deceased-donor kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 7-19.
12. Sung RS, Christensen LL, Leichtman AB, et al. Determinants of discard of expanded criteria donor kidneys: Impact of biopsy and machine perfusion. Am J Transplant 2008; 8: 783-792.
13. Taylor MJ, Baicu SC., Current state of hypothermic machine perfusion preservation of organs: The clinical perspective. Cryobiology 2010; 60: S20-S35.
14. Goldstein MJ, Lubezky N, Yushkov Y, Bae C, Guarrera JV., Innovations in organ donation. Mt Sinai J Med 2012; 79: 351-364.
15. Cho YW, Bunnapradist S, Cho ES, et al. Can machine perfusion decrease the likelihood of discard among biopsied kidneys ? Transpl Proc 2008; 40: 1029-1031.
16. Kozaki K, Sakurai E, Kubota K, et al. Prediction of kidney nonfunction after transplantation with machine perfusion preservation. Transplant Proc 2000; 32: 275-276.
17. Talbot D, Shenton BK, Buckley PE, Gok MA., Experiences learned in the successful establishment of a nonheart beating donor program for renal transplantation. J Urol 2003; 170: 1088-1092.
18. Coca SG, Yalavarthy R, Concato J, Parikh CR., Biomarkers for the diagnosis and risk stratification of acute kidney injury: A systematic review. Kidney Int 2008; 73: 1008-1016.
19. Bhangoo RS, Hall IE, Reese PP, Parikh CR., Deceased-donor kidney perfusate and urine biomarkers for kidney allograft outcomes: A systematic review. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012; 27: 3305-3314.
20. McMahon BA, Koyner JL, Murray PT., Urinary glutathione S-transferases in the pathogenesis and diagnostic evaluation of acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery: A critical review. Curr Opin Crit Care 2010; 16: 550-555.
21. Koyner JL, Vaidya VS, Bennett MR, et al. Urinary biomarkers in the clinical prognosis and early detection of acute kidney injury. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 5: 2154-2165.
22. Hoogland ER, de Vries EE, Christiaans MH, Winkens B, Snoeijs MG, van Heurn LW., The value of machine perfusion biomarker concentration in DCD kidney transplantations. Transplantation 2013; 95: 603-610.
23. Moers C, Varnav OC, van Heurn E, et al. The value of machine perfusion perfusate biomarkers for predicting kidney transplant outcome. Transplantation 2010; 90: 966-973.
24. OPTN: Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. A guide to calculating and interpreting KDPI 2012 (cited January 17, 2013). Available at: http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/resources/allocationcalculators.asp?index=81. Accessed July 8, 2013.
25. Rao PS, Schaubel DE, Guidinger MK, et al. A comprehensive risk quantification score for deceased donor kidneys: The kidney donor risk index. Transplantation 2009; 88: 231-236.
26. Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Pollock BG., Regression models in clinical studies: Determining relationships between predictors and response. J Natl Cancer Inst 1988; 80: 1198-1202.
27. Harrell J, Frank E., Regression modeling strategies: With applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. New York: Springer, 2001.
28. Irish WD, Ilsley JN, Schnitzler MA, Feng S, Brennan DC., A risk prediction model for delayed graft function in the current era of deceased donor renal transplantation. Am J Transplant 2010; 10: 2279-2286.
29. Petersen MR, Deddens JA., A comparison of two methods for estimating prevalence ratios. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008; 8: 9.
30. Diggle P, Heagerty P, Liang K-Y, Zeger S., Analysis of longitudinal data. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 2002.
31. Devarajan P., The strong silent type: The distal tubule to the rescue. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 2129-2130.
32. Jochmans I, Moers C, Smits JM, et al. The prognostic value of renal resistance during hypothermic machine perfusion of deceased donor kidneys. Am J Transplant 2011; 11: 2214-2220.
33. van Smaalen TC, Hoogland ER, van Heurn LW., Machine perfusion viability testing. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2013; 18: 168-173.
34. Vaidya VS, Ford GM, Waikar SS, et al. A rapid urine test for early detection of kidney injury. Kidney Int 2009; 76: 108-114.
35. Martensson J, Martling CR, Bell M., Novel biomarkers of acute kidney injury and failure: Clinical applicability. Br J Anaesth 2012; 109: 843-850.