Can Machine Perfusion Decrease the Likelihood of Discard Among Biopsied Kidneys?

Transplantation Proceedings

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1029-1031

  Cho, Y W ^a,b   Bunnapradist, S ^d   Cho, E S ^e   Stadtler, M ^c   Simmons, V ^c   Locke, J ^c   Mone, T ^c   Mendez, R ^a,b   Hutchinson, I V ^a   Gill, J ^d   Shah, T ^a,b  

^a National Institute of Transplantation Los Angeles   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c OneLegacy   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CREATININE;

ARTERIOLOSCLEROSIS; ARTICLE; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CADAVER KIDNEY; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; CRYOPRESERVATION; DONOR SELECTION; ETHNICITY; GLOMERULOSCLEROSIS; GROUPS BY AGE; HOST RESISTANCE; HUMAN; KIDNEY BIOPSY; KIDNEY DISCARD; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY FIBROSIS; KIDNEY GRAFT REJECTION; KIDNEY PERFUSION; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MACHINE PERFUSION; ORGAN PRESERVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESISTANCE BLOOD VESSEL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; CAUSE OF DEATH; HUMANS; KIDNEY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ORGAN PRESERVATION; PATIENT SELECTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TISSUE DONORS;

EID: 44849094926     PISSN: 00411345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.03.062     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. 2006 OPTN/SRTR Annual Report: Transplant Data 1996-2005
2. Arias L.F., Blanco J., Snachez-Frustuoso A., et al. Histologic assessment of donor kidneys and graft outcome: multivariate analysis. Transplant Proc 39 (2007) 1368
3. Sulikowski T., Tejchman K., Domanski L., et al. Histopathologic evaluation of pretransplant biopsy as a factor influencing graft function after kidney transplantation: a 1-year observation. Transplant Proc 39 (2007) 943
4. El-Husseini A., Sabry A., Zahran A., et al. Can donor implantation renal biopsy predict long-term renal graft outcome?. Am J Nephrol 27 (2007) 144
5. Edwards E.B., Posner M.P., Maluf D.G., et al. The reasons for non-use of recovered kidneys: the effect of donor glomerulosclerosis and creatinine clearance on graft survival. Transplantation 77 (2004) 1411
6. Randhawa P.S., Minervini M.I., Lombardero M., et al. Biopsy of marginal donor kidneys: correlation of histologic findings with graft dysfunction. Transplantation 69 (2000) 1352
7. Sonnenday C.J., Cooper M., Kraus E., et al. The hazards of basing acceptance of cadaveric renal allografts on pulsatile perfusion parameters alone. Transplantation 75 (2003) 2029
8. Mozes M.F., Skolek R.B., and Korf B.C. Use of perfusion parameters in predicting outcomes of machine-preserved kidneys. Transplant Proc 37 (2005) 350
9. Matsuoka L., Shah T., Aswad S., et al. Pulsatile perfusion reduces the incidence of delayed graft function in expanded criteria donor kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 6 (2006) 1473
10. Nyberg S.L., Baskin-Bey E.S., Kremers W., et al. Improving the prediction of donor kidney quality: deceased donor score and resistive indices. Transplantation 80 (2005) 925