Social Research and Biodiversity Conservation

Conservation Biology

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1487-1490

  Sandbrook, Chris ^a,b   Adams, William M ^b   Büscher, Bram ^c   Vira, Bhaskar ^b  

^a UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME WORLD CONSERVATION MONITORING CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL STUDIES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; RESEARCH WORK; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; METHODOLOGY; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIOLOGY;

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; RESEARCH DESIGN; SOCIAL SCIENCES; SOCIAL VALUES;

EID: 84897107079     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12141     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Adams, W. M. 2008. Thinking like a human: social science and the two cultures problem. Oryx 41:275-276.
2. Agrawal, A., and E. Ostrom 2006. Political science and conservation biology: a dialog of the deaf. Conservation Biology 20:681-682.
3. Barry, A., and G. Born, editors. 2013. Interdisciplinarity: reconfigurations of the social and natural sciences. Routledge, Oxford, United Kingdom.
4. Brockington, D., and R. Duffy 2010. Capitalism and conservation. The production and reproduction of biodiversity conservation. Antipode 42:469-484.
5. Brosius, J. P. 2006. Common ground between anthropology and conservation biology. Conservation Biology 20:683-685.
6. Büscher, B., and W. Wolmer 2007. Introduction. The politics of engagement between biodiversity conservation and the social sciences. Conservation and Society 5: http://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972--4923;year=2007;volume=5;issue=1;spage=1;epage=21;aulast=Buscher.
7. Büscher, B., S. Sullivan, K. Neves, J. Igoe, and D. Brockington 2012. Towards a synthesized critique of neoliberal biodiversity conservation. Capitalism Nature Socialism 23:4-30.
8. Campbell, L. M. 2005. Overcoming obstacles to interdisciplinary research. Conservation Biology 19:574-577.
9. Fox, H. E., C. Christian, J. C. Nordby, O. R. W. Pergams, G. D. Peterson, and C. R. Pyke 2006. Perceived barriers to integrating social science and conservation. Conservation Biology 20:1817-1820.
10. Lélé, S., and R. B. Norgaard 2005. Practicing interdisciplinarity. BioScience 55:967-975.
11. Mascia, M., J. P. Brosius, T. A. Dobson, B. C. Forbes, L. Horowitz, M. A. McKean, and N. J. Turner 2003. Conservation and the social sciences. Conservation Biology 17:649-650.
12. Meine, C., M. Soul é, and R. F. Noss 2006. "A mission-driven discipline": the growth of conservation biology. Conservation Biology 20:631-651.
13. Newing, H. 2011. Conducting research in conservation: a social science perspective. Routledge, London.
14. Peet, R., P. Robbins, and M. Watts 2011. Global nature. Pages 1-48 in R. Peet, P. Robbins, and M. Watts, editors. Global political ecology. Routledge, London.
15. Redford, K. 2011. Misreading the conservation landscape. Oryx 45:324-330.
16. Sullivan, S. 2006. The elephant in the room? Problematising 'new' (neoliberal) biodiversity conservation. Forum for Development Studies 12:105-135.
17. Sullivan, S. 2012. Financialisation, biodiversity conservation and equity: some currents and concerns. Third World Network, Penang, Malaysia. Available from http://twnside.org.sg/title/end/pdf/end16.pdf (accessed May 2013).
18. Snoo, G. R. d., et al. 2012. Towards effective nature conservation on farmland: making farmers matter. Conservation Letters DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00296.x