Political science and conservation biology: A dialog of the deaf

Conservation Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 681-682

  Agrawal, Arun ^a   Ostrom, Elinor ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATURE CONSERVATION; POLITICAL DISCOURSE;

CONFLICT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; LEGAL ASPECT; POLITICS; SHORT SURVEY;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DISSENT AND DISPUTES; POLITICS;

EID: 33745155046     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00468.x     Document Type: Short Survey

References (14)

1. Dietz T. E. Ostrom, and P. Stern. 2003. The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302 : 1907 1912.
2. Evans P. 2004. Development as institutional change: the pitfalls of monocropping and the potentials of deliberation. Studies in Comparative International Development 39 : 30 52.
3. Hayes T. M., and E. Ostrom. 2005. Conserving the world's forests: are protected areas the only way? Indiana Law Review 38 : 595 617.
4. Koestler A. 1973. The tree and the candle. Pages 287 314 in W. Gray and N. D. Rizzo, editors. Unity through diversity. Part I. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York.
5. NRC (National Research Council). 2002. The drama of the commons. In E. Ostrom T. Dietz N. Dolšak P. Stern S. Stonich, and E. Weber, editors. Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
6. Moran E., and E. Ostrom, editors. 2005. Seeing the forest and the trees: human-environment interactions in forest ecosystems. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
7. Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
8. Ostrom E. 2005. Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
9. Putnam R. 1993. Making democracy work. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
10. Sanderson S. 2002. The future of conservation. Foreign Affairs 81 : 162 173.
11. Sanderson S., and K. Redford. 2003. Contested relationships between biodiversity conservation and poverty alleviation. Oryx 37 : 389 390.
12. Scott J. C. 1985. Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
13. Simon H. 2000. Public administration in today's world of organizations and markets. Political Science and Politics 33 : 749 756.
14. Thomas C. 2003. Bureaucratic landscapes: interagency cooperation and the preservation of biodiversity. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.