Interdisciplinarity: Reconfigurations of the social and natural sciences

Interdisciplinarity: Reconfigurations of the Social and Natural Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1-56

  Barry, Andrew ^a   Born, Georgina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919555386     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203584279     Document Type: Chapter

References (236)

1. Abbott, A. (2001) Chaos of Disciplines, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
2. Althusser, L. (1990) ‘Philosophy and the Spontaneous Philosophy of the Scientists (1967)’ in Philosophy and the Spontaneous Philosophy of the Scientists and Other Essays (pp. 69-165), London: Verso.
3. Amariglio, J., Resnick, S. and Wolff, R. D. (1993) ‘Division and Difference in the “Discipline” of Economics’, in E. Messer-Davidow, D. Shumway and D. Sylvan (eds.) Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity (pp. 150-84), Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press.
4. Amin, A. and Cohendet, P. (2004) Architectures of Knowledge: Firms, Capabilities and Communities, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Anderson, K. and Braun, B. (eds.) (2008) Environment, Aldershot: Ashgate.
6. Anderson, K. and Nafus, D. (2006) ‘The Real Problem: Rhetorics of Knowing in Corporate Ethnographic Research’, EPIC 2006 conference proceedings, American Anthropological Association.
7. Apostel, L. (1972) ‘Conceptual Tools for Interdisciplinarity: An Operational Approach’, in L. Apostel et al. (eds.) Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities, (pp. 141-84) Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
8. Apostel, L., Berger, G., Briggs, A. and Michaud, G. (eds.) (1972) Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities, Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
9. Arends, B. and Thackara, D. (eds.) (2003) Experiment: Conversations in Art and Science, London: Wellcome Trust.
10. Baerwald, T. (2010) ‘Prospects for Geography as an Interdisciplinary Discipline’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100 (3): 493-501.
11. Barry, A. (2001) Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society, London: Athlone.
12. Barry, A. (2002) ‘The Anti-Political Economy’, Economy and Society, 31 (2): 268-84.
13. Barry, A. (2004) ‘Ethical Capitalism’, in W. Lamer and W. Walters (eds.) Global Governmentality (pp. 195-221), London: Routledge.
14. Barry, A. (2005) ‘Pharmaceutical Matters: The Invention of Informed Materials’, Theory, Culture and Society, 22: 51-69.
15. Barry, A. (2006) ‘Technological Zones’, European Journal of Social Theory, 9: 239-53.
16. Barry, A. (2007) ‘Political Invention’, in K. Asdal, B. Brenna and I. Moser (eds.) Technoscience: The Politics of Interventions (pp. 287-308), Oslo: Unipub.
17. Barry, A. (2010) ‘Tarde’s Method: Between Statistics and Experimentation’, in M. Candea (ed.) The Social After Tarde: Debates and Assessments (pp. 177-90), London: Routledge.
18. Barry, A. (2012) ‘Political Situations: Knowledge Controversies in Transnational Governance’, Critical Policy Studies, 6 (3): 324-36.
19. Barry, A. and Born, G. (2007) ‘Interdisciplinary Research and Evaluation’, unpublished manuscript. Prepared for the Economic and Social Research Council, 5 pp.
20. Barry, A. Born, G. and Weszkalnys, G. (2008) ‘Logics of Interdisciplinarity’, Economy and Society, 37 (1): 20-49.
21. Barry, A. and Thrift, N. (2007) ‘Gabriel Tarde: Imitation, Invention and Economy’, Economy and Society, 36 (4): 509-25.
22. Beck, U. (1992) The Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London: Sage.
23. Becker, E. (2003) ‘Soziale Ökologie: Konturen und Konzepte einer neuen Wissenschaft’, in G. Matschonat and A. Gerber (eds.) Wissenschaftstheoretische Perspektiven Für Die Umweltwissenschaften (pp. 165-195), Wikersheim: Margratf Publishers.
24. Bell, G., Brooke, T. Churchill, E. and Panlos, E. (2003) ‘Intimate (Ubiquitous) Computing’, Proc UbiComp workshop, www.citeseerx.ist.psu.edu (accessed September 2012).
25. Bennett, J. (2004) ‘The Force of Things: Steps to an Ecology of Matter’, Political Theory, (3): 347-72.
26. Bennett, T. and Joyce, P. (2010) Material Powers: Cultural Studies, History and the Material Turn, London: Routledge.
27. Bensaude-Vincent, B. and Stengers, I. (1996) The History of Chemistry, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Berkhout, F., Leach, M. and Scoones, I. (eds.) (2005) Negotiating Environmental Change: New Perspectives from Social Science, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
29. Blackwell, A. and Biggs, S. (2006) ‘Making Material Culture’, Leonardo, 39 (5): 471-3.
30. Boltanski, L. and Thevenot, L. (2006) On Justification: Economies of Worth, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31. Born, G. (1995) Rationalizing Culture: IRCAM, Boulez, and the Institutionalization of the Musical Avant-Garde, Berkeley: University of California Press.
32. Born, G. (2005a) Uncertain Vision: Birt, Dyke and the Reinvention of the BBC, London: Vintage.
33. Born, G. (2005b) ‘On Musical Mediation: Ontology, Technology and Creativity’, Twentieth Century Music, 2 (1): 7-36.
34. Born, G. (2010a) ‘The Social and the Aesthetic: For a Post-Bourdieuian Theory of Cultural Production’, Cultural Sociology, 4 (2): 1-38.
35. Born, G. (2010b) ‘On Tardean Relations: Temporality and Ethnography’, in Candea, M. (ed.) The Social After Gabriel Tarde: Debates and Assessments (pp. 232-49), London: Routledge.
36. Born, G. (2011) ‘Complexity as Method? Experimenting with Ethnographic Agonism in Research on Digital Musics’, paper presented to the American Anthropological Association conference, Montreal, November.
37. Born, G. and Barry, A. (2010) ‘Art-science: From Public Understanding to Public Experiment’, Journal of Cultural Economy, 3 (1): 107-23.
38. Born, G. and Weszkalnys, G. (2007) ‘Irreducible Heterogeneities and Interdisciplines In-formation, or the Possibility of Art-Science’, paper presented to the colloquium, Interdisciplinarity and Society, St Catherine’s College, Oxford, February 2007.
39. Bourdieu, P. (1975) ‘The Specificity of the Scientific Field and the Social Conditions of the Progress of Reason’, Social Science Information, 14 (6): 19-47.
40. Bowker, G. (1993) ‘How to be Universal: Some Cybernetic Strategies, 1943-70’, Social Studies of Science, 23: 107-27.
41. Bowker, G., Star, S. L., Turner, W. and Gasser, L. (eds.) (1997) Social Science, Technical Systems and Cooperative Work, Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Bracken, L. and Oughton, E. (2009) ‘Interdisciplinarity Within and Beyond Geography: Introduction to Special Section’, Area, 41 (4): 371-4.
43. Braun, B. and Whatmore, S. (eds.) (2010) Political Matter: Technoscience, Democracy, and Public Life, Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
44. Briggs, A. and Michaud, G. (1972) ‘Problems and Solutions’, in L. Apostel et al (eds.) Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities (pp. 185-280), Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
45. Bruce, A., Lyall, C., Tait, J. and Williams, R. (2004) ‘Interdisciplinary Integration in Europe: The Case of the Fifth Framework Program’, Futures, 36 (4): 457-70.
46. Buchmann, S. (2006) ‘From Systems-oriented Art to Biopolitical Art Practice’, in M-A. Francis, J. Walsh, L. Sykes and M. Vishmidt (eds.) Media Mutandis: Surveying Art, Technologies and Politics, London: NODE.
47. Buller, H. (2009) ‘The Lively Process of Interdisciplinarity’, Area, 41 (4): 395-403.
48. Callon, M. (ed.) (1998) The Laws of the Market, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
49. Callon, M., Lascoumes, P. and Barthe, Y. (2001) Agir Dans un Monde Incertain: Essai Sur La Democratie Technique, Paris: Seuil.
50. Callon, M., Millo, Y. and Muniesa, F. (eds.) (2007) Market Devices, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
51. Cassin, B. (2005) ‘Managing Evidence’ in B. Latour and P. Weibel (eds.) Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy (pp. 858-64), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Castree, N. (2005) Nature, London: Routledge.
53. Cefkin, M. (ed.) (2009) Ethnography and the Corporate Encounter: Reflections on Research in and of Corporations, New York and Oxford: Berghahn.
54. Century, M. (1999) Pathways to Innovation in Digital Culture, Report for the Rockefeller Foundation, www.nextcentury.ca/PI/PImain.html (accessed September 2012).
55. Clifford, J. (2005) ‘Rearticulating Anthropology’, in D. Segal and S. Yanagisako (eds.) Unwrapping the Sacred Bundle: Reflections on the Disciplining of Anthropology (pp. 24-48), Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
56. Clifford, J. and Marcus, G. (eds.) (1986) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, Berkeley: University of California Press.
57. Collini, S. (1994) ‘Escape from DWEMsville’, Times Literary Supplement, 27 May.
58. Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research (National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine) (2004) Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
59. Connolly, W. (2011) A World of Becoming, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
60. Corbett, J. P. (1964) ‘Opening the Mind’ in D. Daiches (ed.) The Idea of a New University: An Experiment in Sussex (pp. 22-39), London: Andre Deutsch.
61. Corris, M. (2004) Conceptual Art: Theory, Myth and Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Corris, M. (2005) ‘Recoding of Information: Knowledge and Technology’, paper presented to the Open Systems: Rethinking Art c. 1970 conference, Tate Modern, September. www.publication.nodel.org/Recoding-of-Information (accessed February 2007).
63. Council of Science and Technology (2001) Imagination and Understanding: A Report on the Arts and Humanities in Relation to Science and Technology www.bis.gov.uk/assets/bispartners/cst/docs/files/whats-new/01-1051-imagination-understanding.pdf
64. da Costa, B. and Philip, K. (eds.) (2008) Tactical Biopolitics: Art, Activism, and Technoscience, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
65. Daston, L. (2000) ‘The Coming into Being of Scientific Objects’, in L. Daston (ed.) Biographies of Scientific Objects (pp. 1-14), Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
66. Davies, G. (2006) ‘Mapping Deliberation: Calculation, Articulation and Intervention in the Politics of Organ Transplantation’, Economy and Society, 35 (2): 232-58.
67. Deleuze, G. (1988) Foucault, London: Athlone.
68. Demeritt, D. (2001) ‘The Construction of Global Warming and the Politics of Science’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91 (2): 307-37.
69. D’Hooge, H. (2005) ‘User-Centred Research Fuels Technology Innovation at Intel’, Technology Intel Magazine, April www.intel.com/technology/magazine/research/user- centered-innovation-0405.pdf, (accessed June 2006).
70. Doherty, C. (2004) Contemporary Art: From Studio to Situation, London: Black Dog.
71. Donovan, A., Ward, N. and Bradley, S. (2010) ‘Mess Among Disciplines: Interdisciplinarity in Environmental Research’, Environment and Planning A, 42 (7): 1521-36.
72. Doubleday, R. (2007) ‘Organizing Accountability: Co-Production of Technoscientific and Social Worlds in a Nanoscience Laboratory’, Area, 39 (2): 166-75.
73. Dourish, P. (2001) Where the Action Is: Foundations of Embodied Interaction, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
74. Dourish, P. (2006) ‘Implications for Design’, CHI, Montréal, 22-27 April 2006, www.dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1124855, (accessed November 2012).
75. Dourish, P. and Bell, G. (2011) Divining a Digital Future: Mess and Mythology in Ubiquitous Computing, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
76. Edgerton, D. (2006) Warfare State: Britain, 1920-1970, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77. Edwards, P. (2001) ‘Representing the Global Atmosphere: Computer Models, Data, and Knowledge about Climate Change’, in C. Miller and P. Edwards (eds.) Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance (pp. 31-66), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
78. Epstein, S. (1996) Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge, Berkeley: University of California Press.
79. Eriksen, T. (2007) ‘Tunnel Visions’, Social Anthropology, 15 (2): 237-43.
80. Feltham, O. and Clemens, J. (2003) ‘Introduction’ to A. Badiou, Infinite Thought (pp. 1-38), London: Continuum.
81. Ferran, B. (2006) ‘Creating a Program of Support for Art and Science Collaborations’, Leonardo, 30 (5): 442-6.
82. Foucault, M. (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge, London: Tavistock.
83. Foucault, M. (1994) ‘Polemics, Politics, and Problematizations’, in Ethics: The Essential Works, Volume 1 (pp. 111-20), London: Penguin.
84. Foucault, M. (2001) ‘Le Souci de la Vérité’, in Dits et Écrits II, 1976-1988 (pp. 1487-97), Paris: Gallimard.
85. Fraser, M. (2002) ‘What is the Matter of Feminist Criticism?’, Economy and Society, 31 (4): 606-25.
86. Fraser, M., Kember, S. and Lury, C. (eds.) (2006) Inventive Life: Approaches to the New Vitalism, London: Sage.
87. Friman, M. (2010) ‘Understanding Boundary Work through Discourse Theory: Inter/disciplines and Interdisciplinarity’, Science Studies, 23 (2): 5-19.
88. Frodeman, R., Klein, J. T. and Mitcham, C. (eds.) (2010) The Oxford Handbook of Interdisicplinarity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
89. Fuller, S. (1993) Philosophy, Rhetoric, and the End of Knowledge, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
90. Fuller, S. (2002) Social Epistemology, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
91. Fuller, S. (2003) ‘Interdisciplinarity: The Loss of the Heroic Vision in the Marketplace of Ideas’, www.interdisciplines.org/medias/confs/archives/archive_3.pdf (accessed September 2012), pp. 125-130.
92. Galison, P. (1996a) ‘Introduction: The Context of Disunity’ in P. Galison and D. Stump (eds.), pp. 1-36.
93. Galison, P. (1996b) ‘Context and Constraints’ in J. Buchwald (ed.) Scientific Practice, pp. 13-41 Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
94. Galison, P. (1997) Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
95. Galison, P. and Stump, D. (eds.) (1996) The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
96. Gaver, W., Dunne, A. and Pacenti, E. (1999) ‘Cultural Probes’, Interactions, vi (1): 21-9.
97. Geertz, C. (1988) ‘I-Witnessing: Malinowski’s Children’, in Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author, (pp. 73-101) Cambridge: Polity.
98. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, M., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, London: Sage.
99. Goldstein, J. (1984) ‘Foucault Among the Sociologists: The “Disciplines” and the History of the Professions’, History and Theory, 23 (2): 170-92.
100. Guattari, F. (1992) ‘Félix Guattari et l’Art Contemporain’, Interview with Olivier Zahm, Chimères, www.revue-chimeres.fr/drupal_chimeres/files/23chi04.pdf (accessed May 2012).
101. Hacking, I. (2004) ‘The Complacent Disciplinarian’, www.interdisciplines.org//medias/confs/archives/archive_3.pdf (accessed September 2012), pp. 194-97.
102. Halewood, M. (2011) A. N. Whitehead and Social Theory: Tracing a Culture of Thought, London: Anthem.
103. Harkin, M. (2010) ‘Uncommon Ground: Holism and the Future of Anthropology’, Reviews in Anthropology, 39 (1): 25-45.
104. Harper, R. (2003) Inside the Smart Home, London: Springer.
105. Harrison, S. et al (2004) ‘Thinking Across the Divide: Perspectives on the Conservations Between Physical and Human Geography’, Area 36: 435-42.
106. Hart, D. and Victor, D. (1993) ‘Scientific Elites and the Making of US Policy for Climate Change Research 1957-74’, Social Studies of Science, 23: 643-80.
107. Harvey, P., Casella, E., Evans, G., Knox, H., MacLean, C., Silva, E., Thoburn, N. and Woodward, K. (2013) Objects and Materials: A Routledge Companion, London: Routledge.
108. Henare, A., Holbraad, M. and Wastell, S. (2006) Thinking Through Things: Theorising Artefacts Ethnographically, London: Routledge.
109. Hicks, D. and Beaudry, M. (eds.) (2010) The Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
110. HM Treasury (2006) Science and Innovation Investment Framework 2004-2014: Next Steps, London: HMSO, www.bis.gov.uk/files/file29096.pdf, (accessed November 2012).
111. Hinchliffe, S. (2007) Geographies of Nature: Societies, Environments, Ecologies, London: Sage.
112. Hirsch Hadorn, G., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Joye, D., Pohl, C., Wiesmann, U. and Zemp, E. (eds.) (2008) Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, Heidelberg: Springer.
113. Holmes, D. and Marcus, G. (2005) ‘Cultures of Expertise and the Management of Globalization: Toward the Re-Functioning of Ethnography’, in A. Ong and S. Collier (eds.) Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems (pp. 235-52), Malden, MA: Blackwell.
114. Hulme, M. and Turnpenny, J. (2004) ‘Understanding and Managing Climate Change: The UK Experience’, The Geographical Journal, 170: 105-15.
115. Hulme, M. (2009) Why We Disagree About Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
116. Huutoniemi, K., Klein, J. T., Bruun, H. and Hukkinen, J. (2010) ‘Analyzing Interdisciplinarity: Typology and Indicators’, Research Policy, 39 (1): 79-88.
117. Ingold, T. (2001) ‘From Complementarity to Obviation: On Dissolving the Boundaries between Social and Biological Anthropology, Archaeology and Psychology’, in S. Oyama, P. Griffiths and R. Gray (eds.) Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution (pp. 255-79), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
118. Irwin, A. (1995) Citizen Science, London: Routledge.
119. Irwin, A. and Wynne, B. (eds.) (1996) Misunderstanding Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
120. Jantsch, E. (1972) ‘Towards Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity in Education and Innovation’, in L. Apostel, G. Berger, A. Briggs and G. Michaud (eds.) Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities (pp. 97-121), Paris: OECD.
121. Jasanoff, S. (ed.) (2004) States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, New York: Routledge.
122. Jasanoff, S. and Wynne, B. (1998) ‘Science and Decisionmaking’ in S. Rayner and E. Malone (eds.), Human Choice and Climate Change v.1-4 (pp. 1-87), Columbus, OH: Batelle Press.
123. Jones, S. (2006) ‘From Ancestors to Herbs: Innovation According to the “Protestant Re-Formation” of African Medicine’, Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference (EPIC), pp. 177-97.
124. Khlinovskaya Rockhill, E. (2007) ‘On Interdisciplinarity and Models of Knowledge Production’, Social Analysis, 51 (3): 121-47.
125. Klein, J. T. (2004) ‘Prospects for Transdisciplinarity’, Futures, 36: 515-26.
126. Klein, J. T. (2010) ‘A Taxonomy of Interdisciplinarity’, in R. Frodeman et al (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, (pp. 15-30), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
127. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999) Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
128. Krohn, W. (2010) ‘Interdisciplinary Cases and Disciplinary Knowledge’, in R. Frodeman et al (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity (pp. 31-9), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
129. Küchler, S. (2008) ‘Technological Materiality: Beyond the Dualist Paradigm’, Theory, Culture and Society, 25 (1): 101-20.
130. Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, London: Verso.
131. Lamont, M. and Molnar, V (2002) ‘The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences’, Annual Review of Sociology, 28: 167-95.
132. Lash, S., Swersznski, B. and Wynne, B. (eds.) (1996) Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology, London: Sage.
133. Latour, B. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
134. Latour, B. (1999) Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
135. Latour, B. (2004) The Politics of Nature, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
136. Latour, B. and Weibel, P. (eds.) (2002) Iconoclash: Beyond the Image Wars in Science, Religion, and Art, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
137. Latour, B. and Weibel, P. (2005) Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
138. Laurent, B. (2011) Democracy on Trial: Assembling Nanotechnology and its Problems, Doctorat ParisTech, l’École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris.
139. Lawrence, R. and Després, C. (2004) ‘Introduction: Futures of Transdisciplinarity’, Futures, (4): 397-406.
140. Leach, M., Scoones, I. and Wynne, B. (eds.) (2005) Science and Citizens: Globalisation and the Challenge of Engagement, London: Zed Books.
141. Leroy, P. (1995) ‘Environmental Science as a Vocation’, inaugural lecture at the University of Nijmegen, 9 June.
142. Lichnerowicz, A. (1972) ‘Mathematic and Transdisciplinarity’, in. Apostel et al. (eds.) Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities, (pp. 121-7) Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
143. Liverman, D. (1999) ‘Geography and the Global Environment’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89 (1): 107-20.
144. Livingstone, D. (1992) The Geographical Tradition, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
145. Livingstone, D. (2003) Putting Science in its Place, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
146. Lyall, C., Bruce, A., Tait, J. and Meagher, L. (2011) Interdisciplinary Research Journeys: Practical Strategies for Capturing Creativity, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
147. MacKenzie, D., Muniesa, F. and Siu, L. (eds.) (2007) Do Economists Make Markets?: On the Performativity of Economics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
148. Maniglier, P. (1997) De la Position des Problèmes, Diplôme d’Etudes Avancées, Université Paris X Nanterre/École Normale Supérieure.
149. Maniglier, P. (2012) ‘Problem-Sharing: The Role of Problems in Transdisciplinarity from the Standpoint of the French Epistemological Tradition’, paper presented at the workshop on Transdisciplinarity and the Humanities, Kingston University, January.
150. Mansilla, V B. (2006a) ‘Symptoms of Quality: Assessing Expert Interdisciplinary Work at the Frontier - an Empirical Exploration’, Research Evaluation, 15 (1): 17-29.
151. Mansilla, V B. (2006b) ‘Interdisciplinary Work at the Frontier: An Empirical Examination of Expert Interdisciplinary Epistemologies’, Issues in Integrative Studies, 24: 1-31.
152. Mansilla, V. B. and Gardner, H. (2003) ‘Assessing Interdisciplinary Work at the Frontier: An Empirical Exploration of “Symptoms of Quality”’, www.interdisciplines.org/medias/confs/archives/archive_ (accessed September 2012), pp. 160-66.
153. Marcus, G. (2002) ‘Intimate Strangers: The Dynamics of (Non) Relationship between the Natural and Human Sciences in the Contemporary U.S. University’, Anthropological Quarterly, 75 (3): 519-26.
154. Miller, C. (2004) ‘Climate Change and the Making of a Global Political Order’, in S. Jasanoff (ed.), States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order, (pp. 46-66), New York: Routledge.
155. Miller, D. and Slater, D. (2000) The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach, Oxford: Berg.
156. Miller, P. and O’Leary, T. (2007) ‘Mediating Instruments and Making Markets: Capital Budgeting, Science and the Economy’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32: 701-34.
157. Mirowski, P. and Mirjam Sent, E. (eds.) (2002) Science Bought and Sold: Essays in the Economics of Science, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
158. Mitchell, T. (2002) Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity, Berkeley: University of California Press.
159. Mol, A. (2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
160. Morin, E. (1997) ‘Réforme de pensée, transdisciplinarité, réforme de l’Université’, Communication au Congrès International, Quelle Université Pour Demain? Vers Une Évolution Transdisciplinaire De l’Université, Locarno, Switzerland, 30 April-2 May 1997. basarab.nicolescu.perso.sfr.fr/ciret/bulletin/b12/b12c1.htm (Accessed May 2012).
161. Nafus, D. and Anderson, K. (2009) ‘Writing on Walls: The Materiality of Social Memory in Corporate Research’, in K. Cefkin (ed.) Ethnography and the Corporate Encounter: Reflections on Research in and of Corporations (pp. 137-57) New York and Oxford: Berghahn.
162. Naimark, M. (2003) ‘Truth, Beauty, Freedom, and Money: Technology-Based Art and the Dynamics of Sustainability’, a report for Leonardo journal, www.artslab.net, (accessed November 2012).
163. Nardi, B. and O’Day, V (1999) Information Ecologies, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
164. National Academy of Sciences (2004) Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
165. Newman, M. (2002) ‘Conceptual Art from the 1960s to the 1990s: An Unfinished Project?’, in P. Osborne (ed.) Conceptual Art, London: Phaidon.
166. Nicolescu, B. (2008) ‘In Vitro and in Vivo Knowledge - Methodology of Transdisciplinarity’ in B. Nicolescu (ed.) Transdisciplinarity: Theory and Practice, (pp. 1-21) Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
167. Nowotny, H. (2003a) ‘Science in Search of its Audience’, Nova Acta Leopoldina, NF, 87, 325: 211-15.
168. Nowotny, H. (2003b) ‘The Potential of Transdisciplinarity’, www.interdisciplines.org/medias/confs/archives/archive_3.pdf (accessed September 2012), pp. 48-53.
169. Nowotny, H. (2005) ‘The Changing Nature of Public Science’ in H. Nowotny, D. Pestre, B. SchmidtAssmann, H. Schulze-Fielitz and H.-H. Trute (eds.) The Public Nature of Science Under Assault: Politics, Markets, Science and the Law, (pp. 1-28) Berlin: Springer.
170. Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2001) Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Cambridge: Polity.
171. Osborne, P. (2002) Conceptual Art, London: Phaidon.
172. Osborne, P. (2011) ‘From Structure to Rhizome: Transdisciplinarity in French Thought (1)’, Radical Philosophy, 165: 15-16.
173. Osborne, T. (2004) ‘On Mediators: Intellectuals and the Ideas Trade in the Knowledge Society’, Economy and Society, 33 (4): 430-47.
174. Owens, S. (2000) ‘“Engaging the Public”: Information and Deliberation in Environmental Policy’, Environment and Planning A, 32: 1141-8.
175. Petts, J., Owens, S. and Bulkeley, H. (2008) ‘Crossing Boundaries: Interdisciplinarity in the Context of Urban Environments’, Geoforum, 39 (2): 593-601.
176. Piaget, J. (1972) ‘The Epistemology of Interdisciplinary Relationships’, in L. Apostel et al (eds.) Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities (pp. 127-39), Paris: OECD.
177. Pickering, A. (1995a) The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
178. Pickering, A. (1995b) ‘Cyborg History and the World War II Regime’, Perspectives on Science, 3 (1): 1-48.
179. Popper, F. (2007) From Technological to Virtual Art, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
180. Power, M. (ed.) (1996) Accounting and Science: Natural Inquiry and Commercial Reason, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
181. Rabeharisoa, V and Callon, M. (1999) Le Pouvoir des Malades, Paris: Les Presses de l’École des Mines.
182. Rabinow, P. (2005) ‘Midst Anthropology’s Problems’, in A. Ong and S. Collier (eds.) Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems (pp. 40-53), Oxford: Blackwell.
183. Ramadier, T. (2004) ‘Transdisciplinarity and its Challenges: The Case of Urban Studies’, Futures, 36 (4): 423-40.
184. Rancière, J. (2006) ‘Thinking Between Disciplines: An Aesthetics of Knowledge’, Parrhesia, 1: 1-12.
185. Randall, D., Harper, R. and Rouncefield, M. (2005) ‘Fieldwork Ethnography and Design: A Perspective from CSCW’, in K. Anderson and T. Lovejoy (eds.) EPIC 2005: Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference, pp. 88-99, Redmond: WA, Seattle, American Anthropological Association, Arlington, VA.
186. Rayner, S. and Malone, E. (eds.) (1998) Human Choice and Climate Change v.1-4, Columbus, OH: Batelle Press.
187. Reichle, I. (2009) Art in the Age of Technoscience: Genetic Engineering, Robotics, and Artificial Life in Contemporary Art, Vienna: Springer.
188. Rhoten, D. (2004) ‘Interdisciplinary Research: Trend or Transition’, Items and Issues, 5: 6-12.
189. Salvador, T., Bell, G. and Anderson, K. (1999) ‘Design Ethnography’, Design Management Journal, 10 (4): 35-41.
190. Schaffer, S. (1996) ‘Where Experiments End: Tabletop Trials in Victorian Astronomy’, in J. Buchwald (ed.) Scientific Practice (pp. 257-99), Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
191. Schaffer, S. (2007) ‘On Disciplines and Interdisciplines’, paper presented to the colloquium on Interdisciplinarity and Society, St Catherine’s College, Oxford, February 2007.
192. Schellnhuber, H. J. (1999) ‘“Earth System” Analysis and the Second Copernican Revolution’, Nature supplement, 402 (2 December): 19-23.
193. Schmidt, J. (2010) ‘Prospects for a Philosophy of Interdisciplinarity’, in R. Frodeman et al (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
194. Schuler, D. and Namioka, A. (eds.) (1993) Particpatory Design: Principles and Practices, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
195. Segal, D. and Yanagisako, S. (eds.) (2005) Unwrapping the Sacred Bundle: Reflections on the Disciplining of Anthropology, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
196. Sellen, A. and Harper, R. (2003) The Myth of the Paperless Office, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
197. Shackley, S. and Wynne, B. (1985) ‘Integrating Knowledges for Climate Change: Pyramids, Nets and Uncertainties’, Global Environmental Change, 5 (2): 113-26.
198. Silverstone, R. and Hirsch, E. (eds.) (1994) Consuming Technologies, London: Routledge.
199. Skrebowski, L. (2009) Systems, Contexts, Relations: An Alternative Genealogy of Conceptual Art, PhD thesis, Centre for Research in Modern European Philosophy/History of Art and Design, Middlesex University (September).
200. Snow, C. P. (1959) The Two Cultures, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
201. Social Epistemology (1995) ‘Special Issue on Boundary Rhetorics and the Work of Interdisciplinarity’, Social Epistemology, 19 (2).
202. Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J. (1989) ‘Institutional Ecology, “Translations” and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1901-39’, Social Studies of Science, 19 (3): 387-420.
203. Stengers, I. (1997) Power and Invention: Situating Science, Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
204. Stengers, I. (2005) ‘The Cosmopolitical Proposal’, in B. Latour and P. Weibel (eds.), Making Things Public: Atmosphere of Democracy (pp. 994-1003), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
205. Stirling, A. (2005) ‘Opening Up or Closing Down?: Analysis, Participation and Power in the Social Appraisal of Technology’, in M. Leach, I. Scoones and I. Wynne (eds.) Science and Citizens: Globalisation and the Challenge of Engagement (pp. 218-31), London: Zed Books.
206. Strathern, M. (2004a) ‘In Crisis Mode: A Comment on Interculturality’, in M. Strathern, Commons and Borderlands: Working Papers on Interdisciplinarity, Accountability and the Flow of Knowledge (pp. 1-14), Wantage: Sean Kingston.
207. Strathern, M. (2004b) ‘Accountability Across Disciplines’, in M. Strathern, Commons and Borderlands: Working Papers on Interdisciplinarity, Accountability and the Flow of Knowledge (pp. 68-86), Wantage: Sean Kingston.
208. Strathern, M. (2004c) ‘Social Property: An Interdisciplinary Experiment’, PoLAR (Political and Legal Anthropology Review), 27: 33-50.
209. Strathern, M. (2005) ‘Experiments in Interdisciplinarity’, Social Anthropology, 13 (1): 75-90.
210. Strathern, M. (2006) ‘A Community of Critics? Thoughts on New Knowledge’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 12 (1): 191-209.
211. Strathern, M. (2011) ‘An Experiment in Interdisciplinarity: Proposals and Promises’, in C. Camic, N. Gross and M. Lamont (eds.) Social Knowledge in the Making (pp. 257-84), Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
212. Suchman, L. (2007 [1987]) Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions, expanded edition, New York: Cambridge University Press.
213. Suchman, L. (2000) ‘Anthropology as Brand: Reflections on Corporate Ethnography’, www.lancs. ac.uk/fss/sociology/papers/suchman-anthropology-as-brand.pdf
214. Suchman, L., Blomberg, J. and Trigg, R. (2002) ‘Working Artefacts: Ethnomethods of the Prototype’, British Journal of Sociology, 53 (2): 163-79.
215. Tait, J. and Lyall, C. (2001) Investigation into ESRC Funded Interdisciplinary Research, www.supra.ed.ac.uk/Publications/ESRC_report_Interdisiplinary_research. pdf (accessed September 2012).
216. Tarde, G. (2001) Les Lois de L’Imitation, Paris: Les Empêcheurs de Penser en Rond.
217. Thompson, M. and Rayner, S. (1998) ‘Risk and Governance Part I: The Discourse of Climate Change’, Government and Opposition, 33: 139-66.
218. Thompson, M., Rayner, S. and Ney, S. (1998) ‘Risk and Governance Part II: Policy in a Complex and Plurally Perceived World’, Government and Opposition, 33: 330-54.
219. Thrift, N. (2005) Knowing Capitalism, London: Sage.
220. Thrift, N. (2006) ‘Re-Inventing Invention: New Tendencies in Capitalist Commodification’, Economy and Society, 35 (2): 279-306.
221. Thrift, N. (2011) ‘Lifeworld Inc - and What to Do About It’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29 (1): 5-26.
222. Tompkins, E. (2005) Review of Interdisciplinary Environmental Science Centres of Excellence, report to MISTRA, Swedish Foundation for Environmental Research.
223. Turner, S. (2000) ‘What are Disciplines? and How is Interdisciplinarity Different?’, in P. Weingart and N. Stehr (eds.) Practicising Interdisciplinarity (pp. 41-65), Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
224. Turnpenny, J., Haxeltine, A., O’Riordan, T. and Lorenzoni, I. (2005) ‘Mapping Actors Involved in Climate Change Policy Networks in the UK’, Tyndall Working Paper 66, www.tyndall.ac.uk/content/mapping-actors-involved-climate-change-policy- networks-uk, (accessed September 2012).
225. Turnpenny, J. and O’Riordan, T. (2007) ‘Putting Sustainability to Work: Assisting the East of England Region to Respond to the Challenges of Climate Change’, Trans Inst Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 32: 102-5.
226. UNECE (1998) ‘Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decisionmaking and Access to Justice on Environmental Matters’, Aarhus, 25 June 1998, www.unece.org/env/pp/treatytext.html (accessed September 2012).
227. Wallerstein, I. (1996) Open the Social Sciences: Report of the Gulbenkian Commission on the Restructuring of the Social Sciences, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
228. Weingart, P. (2010) ‘A Short History of Knowledge Formations’, in Frodeman et al (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity (pp. 3-14) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
229. Weingart, P. and Stehr, N. (eds.) (2000) Practising Interdisciplinarity, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
230. Whatmore, S. (1999) ‘Hybrid Geographies: Rethinking the “Human” in Human Geography’, in D. Massey, J. Allen and P. Sarre (eds.) Human Geography Today (pp. 22-39), Cambridge: Polity.
231. Whatmore, S. (2009) ‘Mapping Knowledge Controversies: Environmental Science, Democracy and the Redistribution of Expertise’, Progress in Human Geography, 33 (5): 587-99.
232. Whitehead, A. N. (1920) The Concept of Nature, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
233. Whitehead, A. N. (1926) Science and the Modern World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
234. Wilson, S. (2002) Information Arts: Intersections of Art, Science and Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
235. Wissenschaftsrat (2000) Thesen Zur Künftigen Entwicklung Des Wissenschaftssystems in Deutschland, Drs. 4594/00, Berlin.
236. Wynne, B. (1996) ‘May the Sheep Graze Safely? A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide’, in Lash et al (eds.) Risk, Environment and Modernity: Toward a New Ecology (pp. 27-43), London: Sage.