Common ground between anthropology and conservation biology

Conservation Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 683-685

  Brosius, J Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOLOGY; NATURE CONSERVATION;

CONFLICT; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; LEGAL ASPECT; METHODOLOGY; POLITICS; SHORT SURVEY;

ANTHROPOLOGY, CULTURAL; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DISSENT AND DISPUTES; POLITICS;

EID: 33745121847     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00463.x     Document Type: Short Survey

References (5)

1. Brosius J. P. 2006. Seeing communities: technologies of visualization in conservation. In press in G. Creed, editor. Reconsidering community: the unintended consequences of an intellectual romance. School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, New Mexico.
2. Brosius J. P., and D. Russell. 2003. Conservation from above: an anthropological perspective on transboundary protected areas and ecoregional planning. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 17 : 39 65.
3. Brosius J. P. A. Tsing, and C. Zerner. 2005. Communities and conservation: histories and politics of community-based natural resource management. Altamira Press, Lanham, Maryland.
4. Haraway D. 1988. Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14 : 575 599.
5. King N., and H. Biggs. 2005. Seeking common ground: how natural and social scientists might jointly create a unified worldview for sustainable livelihoods. Teleseminar. Transboundary Protected Areas Research Initiative, Wits, South Africa. Available from http://www.wits.ac.za/tpari/Downloads/ seeking%20common%20groundpsntn.ppt accessed November 2005).