Robot responsiveness to human disclosure affects social impression and appeal

ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1-7

  Hoffman, Guy ^a   Birnbaum, Gurit E ^b   Vanunu, Keinan ^a,b   Sass, Omri ^b   Reis, Harry T ^c  

^a Media Innovation Lab   (Israel)

^b INTERDISCIPLINARY CENTER   (Israel)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS;

DESIGN IMPLICATIONS; EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION; HUMAN RELATIONSHIPS; INTERACTIVE ROBOT; NEGATIVE EVENTS; SOCIAL SUPPORT; WRITTEN TEXTS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 84896915188     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21672148     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2559636.2559660     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. M. R. Banks, L. M. Willoughby, and W. A. Banks. Animal-assisted therapy and loneliness in nursing homes: use of robotic versus living dogs. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 9(3):173{177, 2008.
2. C. L. Bethel, M. R. Stevenson, and B. Scassellati. Secret-sharing: Interactions between a child, robot, and adult. In 2011 IEEE Int'l Conf on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pages 2489{2494. Ieee, Oct. 2011.
3. G. E. Birnbaum and H. T. Reis. When does responsiveness pique sexual interest? Attachment and sexual desire in initial acquaintanceships. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(7):946{58, July 2012.
4. M. S. Clark and E. P. J. Lemay. Close relationships. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, and G. Lindzey, editors, Handbook of social psychology, pages 898{940. Wiley, New York, 5 vol 2 edition, 2010.
5. J. Fasola and M. J. Mataric. Using socially assistive human robot interaction to motivate physical exercise for older adults. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(8):2512{2526, 2012.
6. D. Feil-Seifer and M. Mataric. Socially Assistive Robotics. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 18(1):24{31, Mar. 2011.
7. J. Forlizzi. Robotic products to assist the aging population. interactions, 12(2):16, Mar. 2005.
8. S. Fujie, K. Fukushima, and T. Kobayashi. A conversation robot with back-channel feedback function based on linguistic and nonlinguistic information. In Proc. ICARA Int. Conference on Autonomous Robots and Agents, pages 379{384, 2004.
9. R. E. Guadagno and R. B. Cialdini. Online persuasion: An examination of gender di-erences in computer-mediated interpersonal influence. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(1):38{51, 2002.
10. G. Hoffman. Dumb Robots, Smart Phones : A Case Study of Music Listening Companionship. In RO-MAN 2012 - The IEEE Int'l Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2012.
11. G. Hoffman and C. Breazeal. Collaboration in Human-Robot Teams. In Proc. of the AIAA 1st Intelligent Systems Technical Conference, Chicago, IL, USA, Sept. 2004. AIAA.
12. G. Hoffman, R. R. Kubat, and C. Breazeal. A hybrid control system for puppeterring a live robotic stage actor. In Proceedings of the17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2008), 2008.
13. G. Hoffman and K. Vanunu. Effects of robotic companionship on music enjoyment and agent perception. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction (HRI), 2013.
14. T. Kanda, H. Ishiguro, M. Imai, and T. Ono. Body Movement Analysis of Human-Robot Interaction. In Proceedings of theIJCAI-03, Eighteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 177{182, Acapulco, Mexico, Aug. 2003.
15. Y. Kobayashi, D. Yamamoto, T. Koga, S. Yokoyama, et al. Design targeting voice interface robot capable of active listening. In Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on, pages 161{162. IEEE, 2010.
16. H. Kozima, M. P. Michalowski, and C. Nakagawa. Keepon: A playful robot for research, therapy, and entertainment. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(1):3{18, Nov. 2009.
17. S. H. Landry, K. E. Smith, and P. R. Swank. Responsive parenting: Establishing early foundations for social, communication, and independent problem-solving skills. Developmental Psychology, 42(627{642), 2006.
18. R. Looije, M. A. Neerincx, and F. Cnossen. Persuasive robotic assistant for health self-management of older adults : Design and evaluation of social behaviors. Journal of Human Computer Studies, 68(6):386{397, 2010.
19. N. C. Maisel, S. L. Gable, and A. Strachman. Responsive behaviors in good times and in bad. Personal Relationships, 15(3):317{338, Sept. 2008.
20. H. T. Reis. Steps toward the ripening of relationship science. Personal Relationships, 14(1):1{23, Mar. 2007.
21. H. T. Reis. Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing theme for the study of relationships and well-being. In L. Campbell and T. J. Loving, editors, Interdisciplinary research on close relationships: The case for integration, pages 27{52. American Psychological Association, US, 2012.
22. H. T. Reis and B. C. Patrick. Attachment and intimacy: component processes. 1996.
23. L. D. Riek. Wizard of oz studies in hri: A systematic review and new reporting guidelines. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 1(1), 2012.
24. B. Robins, K. Dautenhahn, R. Te Boekhorst, and A. Billard. Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: Can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills? Universal Access in the Information Society, 4(2):105{120, 2005.
25. M. Sharma, D. Hildebrandt, G. Newman, J. E. Young, and R. Eskicioglu. Communicating affect via ight path Exploring use of the Laban Effort System for designing affective locomotion paths. In Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on, pages 293{300. IEEE, 2013.
26. M. Slater, A. Sadagic, M. Usoh, and R. Schroeder. Small Group Behaviour in a Virtual and Real Environment : A Comparative Study. PRESENCE: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 9:37{51, 2000.
27. F. Tanaka and M. Ghosh. The implementation of care-receiving robot at an English learning school for children. In Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on, pages 265{266. IEEE, 2011.
28. A. Tapus, C. Tapus, and M. J. Mataric. The use of socially assistive robots in the design of intelligent cognitive therapies for people with dementia. In Rehabilitation Robotics, 2009. ICORR 2009. IEEE International Conference on, pages 924{929. IEEE, Ieee, June 2009.
29. S. Turkle. Authenticity in the age of digital companions. Interaction Studies, 2007.
30. K. Wada, T. Shibata, T. Musha, and S. Kimura. Robot therapy for elders affected by dementia. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 27(4):53{60, 2008.
31. L. J. Wood, K. Dautenhahn, H. Lehmann, B. Robins, A. Rainer, and D. S. Syrdal. Robot-Mediated Interviews: Does a Robotic Interviewer Impact Question Di-culty and Information Recovery? Assistive Technology: From Research to Practice: AAATE 2013, 33:131, 2013.