Perceptions and experiences of financial incentives: A qualitative study of dialysis care in England

BMJ Open

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2014, Pages

  Abma, Inger ^a   Jayanti, Anuradha ^b   Bayer, Steffen ^c   Mitra, Sandip ^b   Barlow, James ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b MANCHESTER ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^c DUKE NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIALYSIS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HOME DIALYSIS; HUMAN; MANAGER; PERCEPTION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM; VASCULAR ACCESS; CLINICAL TRIAL; ECONOMICS; ENGLAND; INTERVIEW; MOTIVATION; MULTICENTER STUDY; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; REIMBURSEMENT; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY;

ENGLAND; HEMODIALYSIS, HOME; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MOTIVATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REIMBURSEMENT, INCENTIVE; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 84896871707     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004249     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Shaw C, Pruthi R, Pitcher D, et al. UK Renal Registry 15th Annual Report: Chapter 2 UK RRT Prevalence in 2011: national and centrespecific analyses. 2012. http://www.renalreg.com/Reports/2012.html
2. NHS Kidney Care. England Dialysis Capacity Survey as at October 2011. 2011. http://www.kidneycare.nhs.uk/our-work-programmes/commissioning/dialysis- capacity-survey/#
3. Department of Health. Delivering care closer to home: meeting the challenge. 2008. http://icn.csip.org.uk/-library/Delivering-care-closer-to-home. pdf
4. Beard C. No place like home: increasing access to home dialysis. NHS Kidney Care, 2013. http://www.kidneycare.nhs.uk/our-work-programmes/improving- choice-for-kidney-patients/home-therapies/
5. Dudley RA, Frolich A, Robinowitz DL, et al. Strategies to support quality-based purchasing: a review of the evidence. Rockville, MD, 2004.
6. Petersen LA, Woodard LD, Urech T, et al. Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care? Ann Intern Med 2006;145:265-72. (Pubitemid 46768610)
7. Sussex J. Paying for better outcomes - the English way. J Health Serv Res Policy 2009;14:131 -2.
8. Eijkenaar F, Emmert M, Scheppach M, et al. Effects of pay for performance in health care: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Health Policy 2013;110:115- 30.
9. Eijkenaar F. Key issues in the design of pay for performance programs. Eur J Health Econ 2011;14:117 -31.
10. Gillam SJ, Siriwardena AN, Steel N. Pay-for-performance in the United Kingdom: impact of the quality and outcomes framework - a systematic review. Ann Fam Med 2012;14:461-68.
11. Appleby J, Harrison T, Hawkins L, et al. Payment by Results: How can payment systems help to deliver better care? King's Fund, 2012. http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/payment-results-0
12. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. An evaluation of the reimbursement system for NHS-funded care. Report for monitor. 2012. http://www.monitor-nhsft.gov.uk/ home/news-events-publications/our-publications/browse-category/ guidance-health-care-providers-and-co-15
13. McDonald R, Zaidi S, Todd S, et al. A qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the introduction of Best Practice Tariffs. 2012. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/introduction-of-best-practice-tariffs- qualitative-and-quantitative-evaluation
14. Department of Health. Using the Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN) payment framework. 2009.
15. McDonald R, Zaidi S, Todd S, et al. Evaluation of the Commissioning for Quality and Innovation Framework: final report. 2013. http://www.nottingham.ac. uk/business/documents/newsdocuments/ evaluation-of-the-commissioning-for- quality-and-innovation- framework-final-report-feb-2013.pdf
16. NHS Blood & Transplant. Median waiting time to kidney transplant. 2013. http://www.organdonation.nhs.uk/statistics/centre-specific-reports/kidney- centre-specific-reports.asp
17. US Renal Data System. USRDS annual Data Report, volume 2, chapter 1: incidence, prevalence, patient characteristics, & modality. 2012. http://www.usrds.org/atlas.aspx
18. Just PM, de Charro FT, Tschosik EA, et al. Reimbursement and economic factors influencing dialysis modality choice around the world. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008;23:2365-73. (Pubitemid 351957587)
19. Zimmerman DL, Nesrallah GE, Chan CT, et al. Dialysate calcium concentration and mineral metabolism in long and long-frequent hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis for a Canadian Society of Nephrology Clinical Practice Guideline. Am J Kidney Dis 2013;62:97-111.
20. Curran SP, Chan CT. Intensive hemodialysis: normalizing the 'unphysiology' of conventional hemodialysis? Semin Dial 2011;24:607-13.
21. Rocco MV. Short daily and nocturnal hemodialysis: new therapies for a new century? Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2009;20:1-11.
22. Miller J. Does home haemodialysis produce better outcomes for patients? Br J Nurs 2010;19:1275-6, 1278-80.
23. Baboolal K, McEwan P, Sondhi S, et al. The cost of renal dialysis in a UK setting - a multicentre study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008;23:1982-9. (Pubitemid 351768145)
24. McFarlane PA, Pierratos A, Redelmeier DA. Cost savings of home nocturnal versus conventional in-center hemodialysis. Kidney Int 2002;62:2216-22. (Pubitemid 35366178)
25. Kroeker A, Clark WF, Heidenheim AP, et al. An operating cost comparison between conventional and home quotidian hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2003;42(1 Suppl):49-55.
26. Agar JW, Knight RJ, Simmonds RE, et al. Nocturnal haemodialysis: an Australian cost comparison with conventional satellite haemodialysis. Nephrology (Carlton) 2005;10:557-70. (Pubitemid 41801835)
27. Mohr PE, Neumann PJ, Franco SJ, et al. The case for daily dialysis: its impact on costs and quality of life. Am J Kidney Dis 2001;37:777-89. (Pubitemid 32268039)
28. Komenda P, Gavaghan MB, Garfield SS, et al. An economic assessment model for in-center, conventional home, and more frequent home hemodialysis. Kidney Int 2012;81:307-13.
29. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Guidance on home compared with hospital haemodialysis for patients with end-stage renal failure. 2002. http://publications.nice.org.uk/guidance-on-home-compared-with-hospital- haemodialysis-for-patients-with-end-stage-renal-failure-ta48
30. National Service Framework for Renal Services. Part one - dialysis and transplantation. Department of Health, 2004. https://www.gov.uk/government/ publications/national-service-framework-kidney-disease
31. NHS Kidney Care. Frequently asked questions: payment by results (PbR)-renal dialysis. 2011. http://www.kidneycare.nhs.uk/resources-old/faqs/
32. Patel PR, Kallen AJ, Arduino MJ. Epidemiology, surveillance, and prevention of bloodstream infections in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 56:566-77.
33. NHS Commissioning Board. Everyone counts: planning for patients 2013-2014. 2012. http://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/ everyonecounts-planning.pdf
34. Fluck R, Kumwenda M. Clinical practice guidelines - vascular access for haemodialysis. 2011. http://www.renal.org/Clinical/GuidelinesSection/ VascularAccess.aspx#downloads
35. NHS Information Centre. National Kidney Care Audit Vascular Access Report 2010. 2011. http://www.hqip.org.uk/assets/NCAPOP-Library/National-Kidney-Care- Audit-Vascular-Access-Report-2010.pdf
36. NHS Information Centre. National Kidney Care Audit Vascular Access Report 2011. 2012. http://www.hqip.org.uk/assets/NCAPOP-Library/ VAReport2011Interactive03082011-FINAL.pdf
37. Department of Health. Tariff information spreadsheet. 2012. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/confirmation-of-payment-by-results- pbr-arrangements-for-2012-13
38. Department of Health. Payment by Results Guidance for 2011-12. 2011. http://gp.dh.gov.uk/2011/03/28/updated-payment-by-results-pbr-arrangements-for- 2011-12/
39. Department of Health. Payment by Results Guidance 2012-13. 2012. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/confirmation-of-payment-by-results- pbr-arrangements-for-2012-13
40. NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement. Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN) payment framework - summary of indicators 2010-2011. 2010. http://www.institute.nhs.uk/world-class-commissioning/pct-portal/cquin. html
41. Castledine C, Casula A, Fogarty D. UK Renal Registry 14th Annual Report: chapter 2 UK RRT Prevalence in 2010: national and centre-specific analyses. 2011. http://www.renalreg.com/Reports/2011.html
42. Steenkamp R, Castledine C, Feest T, et al. UK Renal Registry 13th Annual Report: chapter 2 UK RRT Prevalence in 2009: national and centre-specific analyses. 2010. http://www.renalreg.com/Reports/2010.html
43. Jayanti A, Weirden AJ, Morris J, et al. Barriers to successful implementation of care in home haemodialysis (BASIC-HHD):1. Study design, methods and rationale. BMC Nephrology 2013;14:197.
44. NHS Kidney Care. Adult kidney dialysis care best practice tariff/payment by results - FAQs for patients. Carers and non-clinicians. 2011.
45. Department of Health. Interim Report of the PbR for Renal Dialysis Project Group. 2008.
46. Sussex J, Farrar S. Activity-based funding for National Health Service hospitals in England: managers' experience and expectations. Eur J Health Econ 2009;10:197-206.