An economic assessment model for in-center, conventional home, and more frequent home hemodialysis

Kidney International

Volumn 81, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 307-313

  Komenda, Paul ^a   Gavaghan, Meghan B ^b   Garfield, Susan S ^b   Poret, Amy W ^b   Sood, Manish M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^b Bridgehead International   (United States)

Author keywords

conventional in center hemodialysis; costing study; end stage renal disease; home hemodialysis; modeling; nocturnal home hemodialysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECONOMIC ASPECT; HEALTH CARE COST; HEMODIALYSIS; HOME CARE; HOME DIALYSIS; HUMAN; KIDNEY FAILURE; MODEL; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84856759460     PISSN: 00852538     EISSN: 15231755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2011.338     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Agar JWM. Nocturnal hemodialysis in Australia and New Zealand. Nephrology 2005; 10: 222-230. (Pubitemid 40910366)
2. Agar JWM, Knight RJ, Simmonds R et al. Nocturnal haemodialysis: an Australian cost comparison with conventional satellite haemodialysis. Nephrology 2005; 10: 557-570. (Pubitemid 41801835)
3. Chan CT, Harvey PJ, Picton P et al. Short-term blood pressure, noradrenergic, and vascular effects of nocturnal home hemodialysis. Hypertension 2003; 42: 925-931. (Pubitemid 37413732)
4. Lacson E, Diaz-Buxo JA. Daily and nocturnal hemodialysis: how do they stack up? Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 38: 225-239.
5. Lindsay RM, and the Daily/Nocturnal Dialysis Study Group. The London, Ontario, Daily/Nocturnal Hemodialysis Study. Semin Dial 2004; 17: 85-91. (Pubitemid 38560977)
6. McFarlane PA, Pierratos A, Redelmeier DA. Cost savings of home nocturnal versus conventional in-center hemodialysis. Kidney Int 2002; 62: 2216-2222. (Pubitemid 35366178)
7. Mohr PE, Neumann PJ, Franco SJ et al. The case for daily dialysis: its impact on costs and quality of life. Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 37: 777-789. (Pubitemid 32268039)
8. Shurraw S, Zimmerman D. Vascular access complications in daily dialysis: a systematic review of the literature. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2005; 57: 151-163. (Pubitemid 43942552)
9. Traeger J, Galland R, Delawari E et al. Six years' experience with short daily hemodialysis: do the early improvements persist in the mid and long term? Hemodial Int 2004; 8: 151-158. (Pubitemid 41025007)
10. Williams AW, O'Sullivan DA, McCarthy JT. Slow nocturnal and short daily hemodialysis: a comparison. Semin Dial 1999; 12: 431-439.
11. Culleton BF, Walsh M, Klarenbach SW et al. Effect of frequent nocturnal hemodialysis versus conventional hemodialysis on left ventricular mass and quality of life. JAMA 2007; 298: 1291-1299. (Pubitemid 47443343)
12. Johansen KL, Zhang R, Huang Y et al. Survival and hospitalization among patients using nocturnal and short daily compared to conventional hemodialysis: a USRDS study. Kidney Int 2009; 76: 1040-1048.
13. Walsh M, Culleton B, Tonelli M et al. A systematic review of the effect of nocturnal hemodialysis on blood pressure, left ventricular hypertrophy, anemia, mineral metabolism, and health-related quality of life. Kidney Int 2005; 67: 1500-1508. (Pubitemid 40463127)
14. De Wit GA, Ramsteijn PG, de Charro FT. Economic evaluation of end stage renal disease treatment. Health Policy 1998; 44: 215-232. (Pubitemid 28345184)
15. Lee H, Manns B, Taub K et al. Cost analysis of ongoing care of patients with end-stage renal disease: the impact of dialysis modality and dialysis access. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 40: 611-622. (Pubitemid 34971291)
16. Maiorca R, Sandrini S, Cancarini GC et al. Integration of peritoneal dialysis and transplantation programs. Perit Dial Int 1997; 17(Suppl 2): S170-S174. (Pubitemid 27470548)
17. Moore R, Marriott N. Cost and price in the NHS: the importance of monetary value in the decision-making framework-the case of purchasing renal replacement therapy. Health Serv Manage Res 1999; 12: 1-14. (Pubitemid 29078028)
18. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Final appraisal determination: the clinical and cost effectiveness of home compared with hospital haemodialysis for patients with end-stage renal failure. Available at http://guidance.nice.org.uk/TA48/Guidance/pdf/English.
19. Peeters P, Rublee D, Just PM et al. Analysis and interpretation of cost data in dialysis: review of Western European literature. Health Policy 2000; 54: 209-227. (Pubitemid 32012610)
20. Haycox A, Duggan AK. Optimising the future development of dialysis services in the UK. Br J Med Econ 1996; 10: 27-35. (Pubitemid 26141310)
21. Kroeker A, Clark W, Heidenheim P et al. An operating cost comparison between conventional and home quotidian hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2003; 42: S49-S55. (Pubitemid 36807683)
22. Mowatt G, Vale L, Perez J et al. Systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home versus hospital or satellite unit hemodialysis for people with end stage renal failure. NHS R&D HTA Programme-NICE 2004; http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/11471/32447/32447.pdf.
23. Roderick P, Nicholson T, Armitage A et al. An evaluation of the costs, effectiveness and quality of renal replacement therapy provision in renal satellite units in England and Wales. Health Technol Assess 2005; 9: 1-178.
24. Lockridge RS, McKinney JK. Is HCFA's reimbursement policy controlling quality of care for end-stage renal disease patients? ASAIO J 2001; 47: 466-468. (Pubitemid 32862309)
25. Lockridge RS, Anderson HK, Coffey LT et al. Nightly home hemodialysis in Lynchburg, Virginia: economic and logistic considerations. Semin Dial 1999; 12: 440-447.
26. McFarlane PA, Bayoumi AM, Pierratos A et al. The quality of life and cost utility of home nocturnal and conventional in-center hemodialysis. Kidney Int 2003; 64: 1004-1011. (Pubitemid 37013836)
27. McPhatter LL, Lockridge RS. Nutritional advantages of nightly home hemodialysis. Nephrol News Issues 2002; 16: 31, 34-36.
28. MacLeod A, Grant A, Donaldson C et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of methods of dialysis therapy for end-stage renal disease: systematic reviews. Health Technol Assess 1998; 2: 1-166. (Pubitemid 28281233)
29. Winkelmayer WC, Weinstein MC, Mittleman MA et al. Health economic evaluations: the special case of end-stage renal disease treatment. Med Decis Making 2002; 22: 417-430.
30. Croxson BE, Ashton T. A cost effectiveness analysis of the treatment of end stage renal failure. N Z Med J 1990; 103: 171-174. (Pubitemid 20372959)
31. MacGregor MS, Agar JW, Blagg CR. Home haemodialysis-international trends and variation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006; 21: 1934-1945.
32. Newton C, Strain H. Payment by results for kidney dialysis project group. UK Department of Health. Accessed online on 05 February 2010 at http://www.dh.gov.uk/publications.
33. Healthcare Management Advisors for the Department of Human Services. Renal dialysis costing and funding review. 2006 Accessed online at http://docs.health.vic.gov.au/docs/doc/Renal-Dialysis-Costingand-Funding-Review- Report-(draft)-December-2006-(consultants-report).
34. Suri RS, Garg AX, Chertow GM et al. Frequent Hemodialysis Network (FHN) randomized trials: study design. Kidney Int 2007; 71: 349-359. (Pubitemid 46227095)
35. Komenda P, Copland M, Makwana J et al. The cost of starting and maintaining a large home hemodialysis program. Kidney Int 2010; 77: 1039-1045.
36. Wordsworth S, Ludbrook A. Comparing costing results in across country economic evaluations: the use of technology specific purchasing power parities. Health Econ 2005; 14: 93-99. (Pubitemid 40124668)
37. Shi L, Hodges M, Drummond M et al. Good research practices for measuring drug costs in cost-effectiveness analyses: an international perspective. Value Health 2010; 13: 28-33.
38. Consumer Price Index, health and personal care, by province (Canada). Statistics Canada. Accessed via the internet on 3 March 2010 at http://www40.statcan.gc.ca/l01/cst01/econ161a-eng.htm.
39. Consumer Price Index, Australia, Dec 2009. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Accessed via the internet on 3 March 2010 at http://www.abs.gov.au/ ausstats/abs@nsf/mf/6401.0.
40. Inflation, United Kingdom. Office for National Statistics. Accessed via the internet on 3 March 2010 at http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/cpi/consumer- price-indices/december-2010/index.html.
41. Diaz-Buxo JA, Schlaeper C, VanValkenburgh D. Evolution of home hemodialysis monitoring systems. Hemodial Int 2003; 7: 353-355.
42. Harris A. The organization and funding of treatment of end-stage renal disease in Australia. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 2007; 7: 113-132.