Barriers to successful implementation of care in home haemodialysis (BASIC-HHD):1. Study design, methods and rationale

BMC Nephrology

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Jayanti, Anuradha ^a   Wearden, Alison J ^b   Morris, Julie ^b   Brenchley, Paul ^a   Abma, Inger ^c   Bayer, Steffen ^c   Barlow, James ^c   Mitra, Sandip ^a  

^a MANCHESTER ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adoption; Barriers; Home haemodialysis; Mixed methods; Organisation; Qualitative; Quality of life

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAREGIVER; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COHORT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT; HOME DIALYSIS; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; KIDNEY FAILURE; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; PARALLEL DESIGN; PATIENT CARE; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUALITY CONTROL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEMODIALYSIS, HOME; HUMANS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREVALENCE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY, CHRONIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

EID: 84883872894     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712369     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-14-197     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Chronic kidney disease as a global public health problem: approaches and initiatives-a position statement from Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes. Levey AS, Atkins R, Coresh J, Cohen EP, Collins AJ, Eckardt K-U, Nahas ME, Jaber BL, Jadoul M, Levin A, Powe NR, Rossert J, Wheeler DC, Lameire N, Eknoyan G, Kidney Int 2007 72 3 247 259 10.1038/sj.ki.5002343 17568785
2. Establishing the Global Kidney Disease Prevention Network (KDPN): a position statement from the National Kidney Foundation. Obrador GT, Mahdavi-Mazdeh M, Collins AJ, Am J Kidney Dis 2011 57 3 361 370 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.12.006 21335246
3. UKRR 2006 to 2012- http://www.renalreg.com/
4. Patient and Technique Survival among a Canadian Multicenter Nocturnal Home Hemodialysis Cohort. Pauly RP, Maximova K, Coppens J, Asad RA, Pierratos A, Komenda P, Copland M, Nesrallah GE, Levin A, Chery A, Chan CT, on behalf of the C.-S. C. Group, Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010 5 10 1815 1820 10.2215/CJN.00300110 20671218
5. Department of Health, Research evidence in self-care support Crown Copyright 2007
6. Systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and economic evaluation, of home versus hospital or satellite unit haemodialysis for people with end-stage renal failure. Mowatt G, Vale L, Perez J, Wyness L, Fraser C, MacLeod A, Daly C, Stearns SC, Health Technol Assess 2003 7 2 1 174 14670218
7. The cost-effectiveness of increasing kidney transplantation and home-based dialysis. Howard K, Salkeld G, White S, McDonald S, Chadban S, Craig JC, Cass A, Nephrology (Carlton) 2009 14 1 123 132 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2008. 01073.x
8. A review of quality of life in chronic renal failure. Parsons DS, Harris DC, Pharmacoeconomics 1997 12 2 Pt 1 140 160 10169667
9. Home haemodialysis-international trends and variation. MacGregor MS, Agar JWM, Blagg CR, Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006 21 7 1934 1945 10.1093/ndt/gfl093 16537659
10. Social deprivation and survival on renal replacement therapy in England and Wales. Caskey FJ, Roderick P, Steenkamp R, Nitsch D, Thomas K, Ansell D, Feest T, Kidney Int 2006 70 12 2134 2140 17063171
11. An update on the referral pattern of patients with end-stage renal disease. Lameire N, Wauters J-P, Teruel JLG, Van Biesen W, Vanholder R, Kidney Int Suppl 2002 80 27 34
12. Influence of a pre-dialysis education programme (PDEP) on the mode of renal replacement therapy. Goovaerts T, Jadoul M, Goffin E, Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005 20 9 1842 1847 10.1093/ndt/gfh905 15919693
13. Predicting a patient's choice of dialysis modality: experience in a United Kingdom renal department. Little J, Irwin A, Marshall T, Rayner H, Smith S, Am J Kidney Dis 2001 37 5 981 986 10.1016/S0272-6386(05)80014-9 11325680
14. Analysis of patient flow into dialysis: role of education in choice of dialysis modality. Marrón B, Martínez Ocaña JC, Salgueira M, Barril G, Lamas JM, Martín M, Sierra T, Rodríguez-Carmona A, Soldevilla A, Martínez F, Perit Dial Int 2005 25 Suppl 3, no. August 2004 56 S59
15. Systematic Barriers to the effective delivery of home dialysis in the United States: a report from the public policy/advocacy committee of the North American Chapter of the International Society for peritoneal dialysis. Golper TA, Saxena AB, Piraino B, Teitelbaum I, Burkart J, Finkelstein FO, Abu-Alfa A, Am J Kidney Dis 2011 58 6 879 885 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.06.028 21903316
16. How Australian nephrologists view home dialysis: results of a national survey. Ludlow MJ, George CR, Hawley CM, Mathew TH, Agar JW, Kerr PG, Lauder LA, Nephrology (Carlton) 2011 16 4 446 452 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2010.01403.x
17. Patient education and access of ESRD patients to renal replacement therapies beyond in-center hemodialysis. Mehrotra R, Marsh D, Vonesh E, Peters V, Nissenson A, Kidney Int 2005 68 1 378 390 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00453.x 15954930
18. International Study of Health Care Organization and Financing for end-stage renal disease in France. Durand-Zaleski I, Combe C, Lang P, Int J Health Care Finance Econ 2007 7 2-3 171 183 17680359
19. Modality options for renal replacement therapy: the integrated care concept revisited. Nesrallah G, Mendelssohn DC, Hemodial Int 2006 10 2 143 151 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2006.00086.x 16623666
20. Thamer M, Hwang W, Fink NE, Sadler JH, Wills S, Levin NW, Bass EB, Levey AS, Brookmeyer R, Powe NR, US nephrologists' recommendation of dialysis modality: results of a national survey 2000 23988757
21. Why patients with ESRD do not select self-care dialysis as a treatment option. McLaughlin K, Manns B, Mortis G, Hons R, Taub K, Am J Kidney Dis Feb. 2003 41 2 380 385 10.1053/ajkd.2003.50047 12552500
22. What limits the expansion of self-care dialysis at home? Ledebo I, Hemodial Int 2008 12 Suppl 1 55 S60 18638243
23. Assessing patterns of adult attachment in medical patients. Maunder RG, Hunter JJ, Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2009 31 2 123 130 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2008.10. 007 19269532
24. Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, Moskowitz MA, J Gen Intern Med 1989 4 1 23 30 10.1007/BF02596485 2644407
25. Medical outcomes study short form-36: a consistent and powerful predictor of morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. Lowrie EG, Curtin RB, LePain N, Schatell D, Am J Kidney Dis 2003 41 6 1286 1292 10.1016/S0272-6386(03)00361-5 12776282
26. Monitoring dialysis patients' health status. Meyer KB, Espindle DM, DeGiacomo JM, Jenuleson CS, Kurtin PS, Davies AR, Am J Kidney Dis 1994 24 2 267 279 8048434
27. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B, SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide The Health Institute, New England Medical Center 1993 p. 1 v. (various pagings)
28. Depression in end-stage renal disease patients: a critical review. Kimmel PL, Cukor D, Cohen SD, Peterson RA, Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2007 14 4 328 334 10.1053/j.ackd.2007.07.007 17904499
29. Diagnosis of depression in patients with end-stage renal disease. Comparative analysis. Smith MD, Hong BA, Robson AM, Am J Med 1985 79 2 160 166 10.1016/0002-9343(85)90004-X 3895906
30. The Beck Depression Inventory as a screening device for major depression in renal dialysis patients. Craven JL, Rodin GM, Littlefield C, Int J Psychiatry Med 1988 18 4 365 374 10.2190/M1TX-V1EJ-E43L-RKLF 3235282
31. Death or hospitalization of patients on chronic hemodialysis is associated with a physician-based diagnosis of depression. Hedayati SS, Bosworth HB, Briley LP, Sloane RJ, Pieper CF, Kimmel PL, Szczech LA, Kidney Int 2008 74 7 861 862
32. Validation of depression screening scales in patients with CKD. Hedayati SS, Minhajuddin AT, Toto RD, Morris DW, Rush AJ, Am J Kidney Dis 2009 54 3 433 439 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.03.016 19493600
33. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Spielberger CD, Anxiety 1987 19 2009
34. The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R). Moss-Morris R, Weinman J, Petrie KJ, Horne R, Cameron L, Buick D, Psychology Health 2002 17 1 1 16 10.1080/08870440290001494
35. Screening for depression while patients dialyse: an evaluation. Chilcot J, Wellsted D, Farrington K, Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008 23 8 2653 2659 10.1093/ndt/gfn105 18323520
36. The importance of illness perception in end-stage renal disease: associations with psychosocial and clinical outcomes. Chilcot J, Semin Dial 2012 25 1 59 64 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2011.00987.x 21967476
37. Memory control beliefs: how are they related to age, strategy use and memory improvement ? Lachman ME, Andreoletti C, Pearman A, Strategy 2006 24 3 359 385
38. Levy B, Improving memory in old age through implicit self-stereotyping American Psychological Association 1996
39. Metacognition in adulthood and old age. Hertzog C, Hultsch DF, The handbook of aging and cognition, vol. 2, F. I. M. Craik and T. A. Salthouse Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers 2000 417 466
40. A brief questionnaire on metacognition: psychometric properties. Klusmann V, Evers A, Schwarzer R, Heuser I, Aging Mental Health 2011 15 8 1052 1062 10.1080/13607863.2011.583624 21707464
41. The quantitative measurement of organizational culture in health care: a review of the available instruments. Scott T, Mannion R, Davies H, Marshall M, Health Serv Res 2003 38 3 923 945 10.1111/1475-6773.00154 12822919
42. Thinking and behavioral styles: Consistency between self-descriptions and descriptions by others. Cooke RA, Rousseau DM, Lafferty JC, Educ Psychol Meas 1987 47 3 815 823 10.1177/001316448704700336
43. A synergistic approach: conducting mixed methods research with typological and systemic design considerations. Hall B, Howard K, J Mixed Methods Res 2008 2 3 248 269 10.1177/1558689808314622
44. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how it is done? Bryman A, Qual Res 2006 6 1 97 113 10.1177/1468794106058877
45. Teddlie C, Tashakkori A, Foundations of mixed methods research:Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioural sciences Thousand Oaks, California, USA: Sage publications 2009
46. Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Morse JM, Nurs Res 1991 40 120 123 2003072
47. An introduction to mixed methods research for nephrology nurses. Hayes B, Bonner A, Douglas C, Ren Soc Australasia J 2013 9 1 8 14
48. Learning from the NHS internal market: a review of the evidence. Ham C, BMJ 1999 318 7182 543 10024285