Commercialism in US elementary and secondary school nutrition environments trends from 2007 to 2012

JAMA Pediatrics

Volumn 168, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 234-242

  Terry McElrath, Yvonne M ^a   Turner, Lindsey ^b   Sandoval, Anna ^b   Johnston, Lloyd D ^a   Chaloupka, Frank J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SUGAR;

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; ARTICLE; BEVERAGE; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; ELEMENTARY STUDENT; FAST FOOD; FOOD; FOOD INDUSTRY; HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT; HUMAN; NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL STATUS; SOFT DRINK; TREND STUDY; UNITED STATES;

BEVERAGES; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FOOD; FOOD DISPENSERS, AUTOMATIC; FOOD SERVICES; HUMANS; MARKETING; PUBLIC SECTOR; SCHOOLS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84896791312     PISSN: 21686203     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4521     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Molnar A. School commercialism and adolescent health. Adolesc Med Clin. 2005;16(2):447-461
2. Brent BO, Lunden S. Much ado about very little: The benefits and costs of school-based commercial activities. Leadership Policy Schools. 2009;8(3):307-336 doi:10.1080/15700760802488619.
3. Ben-Ishai E. School Commercialism: High Costs, Low Revenues.Washington, DC: Public Citizen; 2012.
4. Federal Trade Commission. Marketing Food to Children and Adolescents: A Review of Industry Expenditures, Activities, and Self-regulation.Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission;2008. http://www.ftc.gov /os/2008/07/ P064504foodmktingreport.pdf. Accessed June 5, 2013.
5. Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Health and Human Services. Perspectives on Marketing, Self-regulation, and Childhood Obesity: A Report on a JointWorkshop of the Federal Trade Commission & the Department of Health & Human Services.Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission; 2006. http: //www.ftc.gov/os/2006/05/PerspectivesOn MarketingSelf- Regulation&ChildhoodObesity FTCandHHSReportonJointWorkshop.pdf. Accessed June 5, 2013.
6. Alliance for a Healthier Generation. Competitive Foods Guidelines for K-12 Schools.Washington, DC: Alliance for a Healthier Generation; 2007. https: //schools.healthiergeneration.org/-asset/5zj25d/07-141-CFGuidelinesChart.pdf. Accessed November 25, 2013.
7. Alliance for a Healthier Generation. School Beverage Guidelines. Washington, DC: Alliance for a Healthier Generation; 2007. https://schools. healthiergeneration.org/-asset/wgrpk6/07-267-BeverageGuidelines.pdf. Accessed November 25, 2013.
8. US Council of Better Business Bureaus. Children's Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative Program and Core Principles Statement. Arlington, VA: US Council of Better Business Bureaus. https://www.bbb.org/us/storage/0/ Shared%20Documents/Enhanced%20Core20Principles%20Third%20Edition%20 -%20Letterhead.pdf. Accessed August 6, 2013.
9. Federal Trade Commission. A Review of Marketing Food to Children and Adolescents: Follow-up Report.Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission; 2012. http://www.ftc.gov/os/2012/12/121221foodmarketingreport.pdf. Accessed August 6, 2013.
10. O'Toole TP, Anderson S, Miller C, Guthrie J. Nutrition services and foods and beverages available at school: results from the School Health Policies and Programs Study 2006. J Sch Health. 2007;77(8):500-521
11. Chriqui JF, Resnick EA, Schneider L, et al. School DistrictWellness Policies: Evaluating Progress and Potential for Improving Children's Health Five Years after the Federal Mandate. School Years 2006-07 through 2010-11. Vol 3. Chicago: Bridging the Gap Program, Health Policy Center, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago; 2013.
12. Briefel RR, Crepinsek MK, Cabili C, Wilson A, Geason PM. School food environments and practices affect dietary behaviors of US public school children. J AmDiet Assoc. 2009;109(2) (suppl):S91-S107
13. Johanson J, Smith J,Wootan MG. Raw Deal: School Beverage Contracts Less Lucrative Than They Seem.Washington, DC: Center for Science in the Public Interest; 2006.
14. Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Terry-McElrath YM, Colabianchi N. School Policies and Practices to Improve Health and Prevent Obesity: National Secondary School Survey Results: School Years 2006-07 through 2010-11. Vol 3. Ann Arbor,MI: Bridging the Gap Program, Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research; 2013.
15. Johnston LD, Delva J, O'Malley PM. Soft drink availability, contracts, and revenues in American secondary schools. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33(4)(suppl): S209-S225
16. Turner L, Chaloupka FJ, Sandoval A. School Policies and Practices for Improving Children's Health: National Elementary School Survey Results: School Years 2006-07 through 2009-10. Vol 2. Chicago: Bridging the Gap Program, Health Policy Center, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago; 2012.
17. Adachi-Mejia AM, LongacreMR, Skatrud-MickelsonM, et al. Variation in access to sugar-sweetened beverages in vending machines across rural, town and urban high schools. Public Health. 2013;127(5):485-491
18. Turner L, Chaloupka FJ, Chriqui JF, Sandoval A. School Policies and Practices to Improve Health and Prevent Obesity: National Elementary School Survey Results: School Years 2006-07 and 2007-08. Vol 1. Chicago: Bridging the Gap, Health Policy Center, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago; 2010.
19. Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Terry-McElrath YM, Freedman-Doan P, Brenner JS. School Policies and Practices to Improve Health and Prevent Obesity: National Secondary School Survey Results, School Years 2006-07 and 2007-08. Vol 1. Ann Arbor,MI: Bridging the Gap Program, Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research; 2011.
20. National Center for Education Statistics. Common core of data. http://nces.ed.gov/ccd /index.asp. Accessed January 27, 2013.
21. Block JP, Scribner RA, DeSalvo KB. Fast food, race/ethnicity, and income: a geographic analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27(3):211-217
22. Cheyne A, Gonzalez P, Mejia P, Dorfman L. Food and Beverage Marketing to Children and Adolescents: Limited Progress by 2012. Minneapolis, MN: Healthy Eating Research; 2013.
23. Lesser LI, Zimmerman FJ, Cohen DA. Outdoor advertising, obesity, and soda consumption: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:20. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-20.
24. Powell LM, Szczypka G, Chaloupka FJ. Adolescent exposure to food advertising on television. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33(4)(suppl): S251-S256
25. Harris JL, Brownell KD, Bargh JA. The food marketing defense model: Integrating psychological research to protect youth and inform public policy. Soc Issues Policy Rev. 2009;3(1):211-271
26. Harris JL, Graff SK. Protecting children from harmful food marketing: Options for local government to make a difference. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011;8(5):A92.http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2011 /sep/10-0272.htm. Accessed November 25, 2013.
27. Johanson J,Wootan MG. Sweet Deals: School Fundraising Can Be Healthy and Profitable. Washington, DC: Center for Science in the Public Interest; 2007.
28. Molnar A, Boninger F, HarrisMD, Libby KM, Fogarty J. Promoting Consumption at School: Health Threats Associatedwith Schoolhouse Commercialism - The Fifteenth Annual Report on Schoolhouse Commercializing Trends: 2011-2012. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center; 2013.
29. Nestle M. Soft drink "pouring rights": marketing empty calories to children. Public Health Rep. 2000;115(4):308-319
30. US Census Bureau. Public Education Finances: 2011 (G11-ASPEF).Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2013.
31. Oliff P, Mai C, Leachman M. New School Year Brings More Cuts in State Funding for Schools. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities; 2012.
32. Molnar A, Boninger F, Wilkinson G, Fogarty J, Geary S. Effectively Embedded: Schools and The Machinery of Modern Marketing - The Thirteenth Annual Report on Schoolhouse Commercializing Trends: 2009-2010. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center; 2010.
33. Molnar A, Boninger F, Fogarty J. The Educational Cost of Schoolhouse Commercialism - The Fourteenth Annual Report on Schoolhouse Commercializing Trends: 2010-2011. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center; 2011.
34. California Project LEAN. Captive Kids: Selling Obesity at Schools: An Action Guide to Stop the Marketingof UnhealthyFoodsandBeveragesinSchool. Sacramento, CA: California Project LEAN; 2007.
35. Institute of Medicine. Food Marketing to Children and Youth: Threat or Opportunity? Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.
36. Swinburn B, Sacks G, Lobstein T, et al; International Obesity TaskforceWorking Group on Marketing to Children. The "Sydney Principles" for reducing the commercial promotion of foods and beverages to children. Public Health Nutr. 2008;11(9):881-886
37. Chapter 156: An Act to Protect Children's Health on School Grounds. S.P. 67, L.D. 184 (2007). http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/bills/bills-123rd/ billpdfs/SP006701.pdf. Accessed November 25, 2013.
38. Polacsek M, O'Rourke K, O'Brien L, Blum JW, Donahue S. Examining compliance with a statewide law banning junk food and beverage marketing in Maine schools. Public Health Rep. 2012;127(2):216-223
39. Shin A. Removing schools' soda is sticky point. Washington Post. March 22, 2007. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content /article/2007/03/21/ AR2007032101966.html. Accessed June 4, 2013.
40. Han-Markey TL,Wang L, Schlotterbeck S, et al. A public school district's vending machine policy and changes over a 4-year period: Implementation of a national wellness policy. Public Health. 2012;126(4):335-337
41. Wharton CM, Long M, Schwartz MB. Changing nutrition standards in schools: The emerging impact on school revenue. J Sch Health. 2008;78(5):245-251
42. Food and Nutrition Service, USDA. National School Lunch Program and School Breakfast Program: nutrition standards for all foods sold in school as required by the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010: Interim final rule. Fed Regist. 2013;78(125):39067-39120
43. US Department of Agriculture and US Department of Health and Human Services. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010. 7th ed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; December 2010.