Functional difference between sustained and transient modulations of cognitive control in the Simon task: Evidence from false alarm responses on no-go trials

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 11, 2013, Pages

  Hasegawa, Kunihiro ^a   Takahashi, Shin'ya ^a  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ARTICLE; CINGULATE GYRUS; COGNITION; CONFLICT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MODULATION; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84896726073     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081804     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Lu C-H, Proctor RW (1995) The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychon Bull Rev 2: 174-207. doi:10.3758/BF03210959. PubMed: 24203654.
2. Kornblum S, Hasbroucq T, Osman A (1990) Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - a model and taxonomy. Psychol Rev 97: 253-270. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.253. PubMed: 2186425.
3. Gratton G, Coles MG, Donchin E (1992) Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. J Exp Psychol Gen 121: 480-506. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480. PubMed: 1431740.
4. Botvinick MM, Braver TS, Barch DM, Carter CS, Cohen JD (2001) Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol Rev 108: 624-652. doi:10.1037/0033- 295X.108.3.624. PubMed: 11488380. (Pubitemid 33604139)
5. Botvinick MM, Cohen JD, Carter CS (2004) Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. Trends Cogn Sci 8: 539-546. doi:10.1016/j.tics. 2004.10.003. PubMed: 15556023. (Pubitemid 39536251)
6. Egner T, Hirsch J (2005) Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nat Neurosci 8: 1784-1790. doi:10.1038/nn1594. PubMed: 16286928. (Pubitemid 41683207)
7. Notebaert W, Verguts T (2008) Cognitive control acts locally. Cognition 106: 1071-1080. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.011. PubMed: 17537419. (Pubitemid 350265862)
8. Stürmer B, Leuthold H, Soetens E, Schröter H, Sommer W (2002) Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 28: 1345-1363. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.28.6.1345. PubMed: 12542132. (Pubitemid 36107178)
9. Wendt M, Kluwe RH, Peters A (2006) Sequential modulations of interference evoked by processing task-irrelevant stimulus features. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 32: 644-667. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.644. PubMed: 16822130. (Pubitemid 44195473)
10. Hasegawa K, Takahashi S (2013) Transient and sustained cognitive control modulates task-irrelevant process. Jpn Psychol Res 55: 84-93. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5884.2012.00535.x.
11. Lindsay DS, Jacoby LL (1994) Stroop process dissociations: the relationship between facilitation and interference. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20: 219-234. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.2.219. PubMed: 8189189.
12. Logan GD, Zbrodoff NJ (1979) When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Mem Cogn 7: 166-174. doi:10.3758/BF03197535.
13. Braver TS (2012) The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework. Trends Cogn Sci 16: 106-113. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.12. 010. PubMed: 22245618.
14. De Pisapia N, Braver TS (2006) A model of dual control mechanisms through anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex interactions. Neurocomputing 69: 1322-1326. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2005.12.100.
15. Funes MJ, Lupiáñez J, Humphreys G (2010) Sustained vs. transient cognitive control: evidence of a behavioral dissociation. Cognition 114: 338-347. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.007. PubMed: 19962136.
16. Ridderinkhof KR (2002) Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: activation and suppression in conflict tasks. Psychol Res 66: 312-323. doi:10.1007/s00426-002-0104-7. PubMed: 12466928.
17. Schmidt JR (2013) Questioning conflict adaptation: proportion congruent and Gratton effects reconsidered. Psychon Bull Rev 20: 615-630. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0373-0. PubMed: 23325703.
18. Schmidt JR, Besner D (2008) The Stroop effect: Why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 34: 514-523. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.514. PubMed: 18444752.
19. Hommel B, Proctor RW, Vu K-PL (2004) A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychol Res 68: 1-17. doi:10.1007/s00426- 003-0132-y. PubMed: 14752663. (Pubitemid 40549613)
20. Akçay C, Hazeltine E (2007) Conflict monitoring and feature overlap: Two sources of sequential modulations. Psychon Bull Rev 14: 742-748. doi:10.3758/BF03196831. PubMed: 17972743.
21. Kleiner M, Brainard D, Pelli D, Ingling A, Murray R (2007) What's new in Psychtoolbox-3. Perception 36 Abstract Supplement
22. Brainard DH (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis 10: 443-446. doi:10.1163/156856897X00375. PubMed: 9176952.
23. Pelli DG (1997) The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis 10: 437-442. doi:10.1163/ 156856897X00366. PubMed: 9176953.
24. Ryan TA (1960) Significance tests for multiple comparison of proportions, variances, and other statistics. Psychol Bull 57: 318-328. doi:10.1037/ h0044320. PubMed: 14440422.