Role of percutaneous needle biopsy for renal masses

Seminars in Interventional Radiology

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 20-26

  Caoili, Elaine M ^a   Davenport, Matthew S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

interventional radiology; percutaneous biopsy; renal cell carcinoma; renal mass

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER MORTALITY; COMPLICATION; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; KIDNEY BIOPSY; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; KIDNEY TUMOR; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MORTALITY; PERCUTANEOUS BIOPSY; RENOGRAPHY; ROLE PLAYING;

EID: 84896724194     PISSN: 07399529     EISSN: 10988963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1363839     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Herts B. R., Baker M. E. The current role of percutaneous biopsy in the evaluation of renal masses. Semin Urol Oncol: 1995; 13 4 254 261
2. Lane B. R., Samplaski M. K., Herts B. R., Zhou M., Novick A. C., Campbell S. C. Renal mass biopsy-a renaissance? J Urol: 2008; 179 1 20 27
3. Silverman S. G., Gan Y. U., Mortele K. J., Tuncali K., Cibas E. S. Renal masses in the adult patient: the role of percutaneous biopsy. Radiology: 2006; 240 1 6 22
4. Silverman S. G., Israel G. M., Herts B. R., Richie J. P. Management of the incidental renal mass. Radiology: 2008; 249 1 16 31
5. Tan H. J., Jacobs B. L., Hafez K. S., et al. Understanding the role of percutaneous biopsy in the management of patients with a small renal mass. Urology: 2012; 79 2 372 377
6. Halverson S. J., Kunju L. P., Bhalla R., et al. Accuracy of determining small renal mass management with risk stratified biopsies: confirmation by final pathology. J Urol: 2013; 189 2 441 446
7. Volpe A., Cadeddu J. A., Cestari A., et al. Contemporary management of small renal masses. Eur Urol: 2011; 60 3 501 515
8. Hollingsworth J. M., Miller D. C., Daignault S., Hollenbeck B. K. Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reassess treatment effect. J Natl Cancer Inst: 2006; 98 18 1331 1334
9. Chow W. H., Devesa S. S., Warren J. L., Fraumeni J. F. Jr. Rising incidence of renal cell cancer in the United States. JAMA: 1999; 281 17 1628 1631
10. Cho E., Adami H. O., Lindblad P. Epidemiology of renal cell cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am: 2011; 25 4 651 665
11. Zagoria R. J. Imaging of small renal masses: a medical success story. AJR Am J Roentgenol: 2000; 175 4 945 955
12. Frank I., Blute M. L., Cheville J. C., Lohse C. M., Weaver A. L., Zincke H. Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size. J Urol: 2003; 170 (6, Pt 1): 2217 2220
13. Lane B. R., Babineau D., Kattan M. W., et al. A preoperative prognostic nomogram for solid enhancing renal tumors 7 cm or less amenable to partial nephrectomy. J Urol: 2007; 178 2 429 434
14. Patard J. J., Leray E., Rioux-Leclercq N., et al. Prognostic value of histologic subtypes in renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter experience. J Clin Oncol: 2005; 23 12 2763 2771
15. Ljungberg B., Cowan N. C., Hanbury D. C., et al. European Association of Urology Guideline Group. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update. Eur Urol: 2010; 58 3 398 406
16. Van Poppel H., Joniau S. Is surveillance an option for the treatment of small renal masses? Eur Urol: 2007; 52 5 1323 1330
17. Caoili E. M., Bude R. O., Higgins E. J., Hoff D. L., Nghiem H. V. Evaluation of sonographically guided percutaneous core biopsy of renal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol: 2002; 179 2 373 378
18. Maturen K. E., Nghiem H. V., Caoili E. M., Higgins E. G., Wolf J. S. Jr, Wood D. P. Jr. Renal mass core biopsy: accuracy and impact on clinical management. AJR Am J Roentgenol: 2007; 188 2 563 570
19. Ralls P. W., Barakos J. A., Kaptein E. M., et al. Renal biopsy-related hemorrhage: frequency and comparison of CT and sonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr: 1987; 11 6 1031 1034
20. Strope S. A., Wolf J. S. Jr, Hafez K. S., et al. Understanding the relationship between health care quality and the renal mass. Urol Oncol: 2009; 27 4 443 447
21. Kim J. K., Park S. Y., Shon J. H., Cho K. S. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT. Radiology: 2004; 230 3 677 684
22. Sasiwimonphan K., Takahashi N., Leibovich B. C., Carter R. E., Atwell T. D., Kawashima A. Small (<4 cm) renal mass: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma utilizing MR imaging. Radiology: 2012; 263 1 160 168
23. Hindman N., Ngo L., Genega E. M., et al. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: can it be differentiated from clear cell renal cell carcinoma by using standard MR techniques? Radiology: 2012; 265 2 468 477
24. Craig W. D., Wagner B. J., Travis M. D. Pyelonephritis: radiologic-pathologic review. Radiographics: 2008; 28 1 255 277, quiz 327-328
25. Dyer R., DiSantis D. J., McClennan B. L. Simplified imaging approach for evaluation of the solid renal mass in adults. Radiology: 2008; 247 2 331 343
26. Choyke P. L., Glenn G. M., Walther M. M., Zbar B., Linehan W. M. Hereditary renal cancers. Radiology: 2003; 226 1 33 46
27. Verine J., Pluvinage A., Bousquet G., et al. Hereditary renal cancer syndromes: an update of a systematic review. Eur Urol: 2010; 58 5 701 710
28. Birnbaum B. A., Maki D. D., Chakraborty D. P., Jacobs J. E., Babb J. S. Renal cyst pseudoenhancement: evaluation with an anthropomorphic body CT phantom. Radiology: 2002; 225 1 83 90
29. Maki D. D., Birnbaum B. A., Chakraborty D. P., Jacobs J. E., Carvalho B. M., Herman G. T. Renal cyst pseudoenhancement: beam-hardening effects on CT numbers. Radiology: 1999; 213 2 468 472
30. Gerst S., Hann L. E., Li D., et al. Evaluation of renal masses with contrast-enhanced ultrasound: initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol: 2011; 197 4 897 906
31. Israel G. M., Bosniak M. A. How I do it: evaluating renal masses. Radiology: 2005; 236 2 441 450
32. Bosniak M. A., Megibow A. J., Hulnick D. H., Horii S., Raghavendra B. N. CT diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma: the importance of detecting small amounts of fat. AJR Am J Roentgenol: 1988; 151 3 497 501
33. Davenport M. S., Neville A. M., Ellis J. H., Cohan R. H., Chaudhry H. S., Leder R. A. Diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma with Hounsfield unit thresholds: effect of size of region of interest and nephrographic phase imaging. Radiology: 2011; 260 1 158 165
34. Israel G. M., Hindman N., Hecht E., Krinsky G. The use of opposed-phase chemical shift MRI in the diagnosis of renal angiomyolipomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol: 2005; 184 6 1868 1872
35. Kawashima A., Sandler C. M., Ernst R. D., Tamm E. P., Goldman S. M., Fishman E. K. CT evaluation of renovascular disease. Radiographics: 2000; 20 5 1321 1340
36. Browne R. F., Riordan E. O., Roberts J. A., et al. Renal artery aneurysms: diagnosis and surveillance with 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Eur Radiol: 2004; 14 10 1807 1812
37. Shonai T., Koito K., Ichimura T., Hirokawa N., Sakata K., Hareyama M. Renal artery aneurysm: evaluation with color Doppler ultrasonography before and after percutaneous transarterial embolization. J Ultrasound Med: 2000; 19 4 277 280
38. Harisinghani M. G., Maher M. M., Gervais D. A., et al. Incidence of malignancy in complex cystic renal masses (Bosniak category III): should imaging-guided biopsy precede surgery? AJR Am J Roentgenol: 2003; 180 3 755 758
39. Rybicki F. J., Shu K. M., Cibas E. S., Fielding J. R., vanSonnenberg E., Silverman S. G. Percutaneous biopsy of renal masses: sensitivity and negative predictive value stratified by clinical setting and size of masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol: 2003; 180 5 1281 1287
40. Hayakawa M., Hatano T., Tsuji A., Nakajima F., Ogawa Y. Patients with renal cysts associated with renal cell carcinoma and the clinical implications of cyst puncture: a study of 223 cases. Urology: 1996; 47 5 643 646
41. Bosniak M. A. The Bosniak renal cyst classification: 25 years later. Radiology: 2012; 262 3 781 785
42. O'Malley R. L., Godoy G., Hecht E. M., Stifelman M. D., Taneja S. S. Bosniak category IIF designation and surgery for complex renal cysts. J Urol: 2009; 182 3 1091 1095
43. Appelbaum A. H., Kamba T. T., Cohen A. S., Qaisi W. G., Amirkhan R. H. Effectiveness and safety of image-directed biopsies: coaxial technique versus conventional fine-needle aspiration. South Med J: 2002; 95 2 212 217
44. Brierly R. D., Thomas P. J., Harrison N. W., Fletcher M. S., Nawrocki J. D., Ashton-Key M. Evaluation of fine-needle aspiration cytology for renal masses. BJU Int: 2000; 85 1 14 18
45. Helm C. W., Burwood R. J., Harrison N. W., Melcher D. H. Aspiration cytology of solid renal tumours. Br J Urol: 1983; 55 3 249 253
46. Murphy W. M., Zambroni B. R., Emerson L. D., Moinuddin S., Lee L. H. Aspiration biopsy of the kidney. Simultaneous collection of cytologic and histologic specimens. Cancer: 1985; 56 1 200 205
47. Goethuys H., Van Poppel H., Oyen R., Baert L. The case against fine-needle aspiration cytology for small solid kidney tumors. Eur Urol: 1996; 29 3 284 287
48. Truong L. D., Todd T. D., Dhurandhar B., Ramzy I. Fine-needle aspiration of renal masses in adults: analysis of results and diagnostic problems in 108 cases. Diagn Cytopathol: 1999; 20 6 339 349
49. Juul N., Torp-Pedersen S., Gronvall S., Holm H. H., Koch F., Larsen S. Ultrasonically guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of renal masses. J Urol: 1985; 133 4 579 581
50. Murphy W. M., Zambroni B. R., Emerson L. D., Moinuddin S., Lee L. H. Aspiration biopsy of the kidney. Simultaneous collection of cytologic and histologic specimens. Cancer: 1985; 56 1 200 205
51. Campbell S. C., Novick A. C., Herts B., et al. Prospective evaluation of fine needle aspiration of small, solid renal masses: accuracy and morbidity. Urology: 1997; 50 1 25 29
52. Niceforo J., Coughlin B. F. Diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma: value of fine-needle aspiration cytology in patients with metastases or contraindications to nephrectomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol: 1993; 161 6 1303 1305
53. Lechevallier E., André M., Barriol D., et al. Fine-needle percutaneous biopsy of renal masses with helical CT guidance. Radiology: 2000; 216 2 506 510
54. Volpe A., Kachura J. R., Geddie W. R., et al. Techniques, safety and accuracy of sampling of renal tumors by fine needle aspiration and core biopsy. J Urol: 2007; 178 2 379 386
55. Lane B. R., Campbell S. C., Aydun H., et al. The impact of number and location of cores on the diagnostic accuracy of renal mass biopsy: an ex vivo study. J Urol: 2008; 179 477 478
56. Wood B. J., Khan M. A., McGovern F., Harisinghani M., Hahn P. F., Mueller P. R. Imaging guided biopsy of renal masses: indications, accuracy and impact on clinical management. J Urol: 1999; 161 5 1470 1474
57. Dechet C. B., Sebo T., Farrow G., Blute M. L., Engen D. E., Zincke H. Prospective analysis of intraoperative frozen needle biopsy of solid renal masses in adults. J Urol: 1999; 162 4 1282 1284, discussion 1284-1285
58. Ralls P. W., Barakos J. A., Kaptein E. M., et al. Renal biopsy-related hemorrhage: frequency and comparison of CT and sonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr: 1987; 11 6 1031 1034
59. Slywotzky C., Maya M. Needle tract seeding of transitional cell carcinoma following fine-needle aspiration of a renal mass. Abdom Imaging: 1994; 19 2 174 176
60. Silberzweig J. E., Tey S., Winston J. A., Mitty H. A. Percutaneous renal biopsy complicated by renal capsular artery pseudoaneurysm. Am J Kidney Dis: 1998; 31 3 533 535
61. Leveridge M. J., Finelli A., Kachura J. R., et al. Outcomes of small renal mass needle core biopsy, nondiagnostic percutaneous biopsy, and the role of repeat biopsy. Eur Urol: 2011; 60 3 578 584
62. Neuzillet Y., Lechevallier E., Andre M., Daniel L., Coulange C. Accuracy and clinical role of fine needle percutaneous biopsy with computerized tomography guidance of small (less than 4.0 cm) renal masses. J Urol: 2004; 171 5 1802 1805