Renal mass core biopsy: Accuracy and impact on clinical management

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 188, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 563-570

  Maturen, Katherine E ^a,b   Nghiem, Hanh V ^c   Caoili, Elaine M ^a   Higgins, Ellen G ^a   Wolf Jr , J Stuart ^a   Wood Jr , David P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HOSPITALS   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Core biopsy; Kidney; Renal disease; Renal mass

Indexed keywords

IODINATED CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; AGED; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FALSE ANEURYSM; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW; KIDNEY BIOPSY; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; KIDNEY TUMOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PATIENT CARE; PERCUTANEOUS BIOPSY; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT INDICATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 33846547997     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.06.0220     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Brierly RD, Thomas PJ, Harrison NW, Flectcher MS, Nawrocki JD, Ashton-Key M. Evaluation of fine-needle aspiration cytology for renal masses. BJU Int 2000; 85:14-18
2. Campbell SC, Novick AC, Herts B, et al. Prospective evaluation of fine needle aspiration of small, solid renal masses: accuracy and morbidity. Urology 1997; 50:25-29
3. Dechet CB, Zincke H, Sebo TJ, et al. Prospective analysis of computerized tomography and needle biopsy with permanent sectioning to determine the nature of solid renal masses in adults. J Urol 2003; 169:71-74
4. Wolf JS. Evaluation and management of solid and cystic renal masses. J Urol 1998; 159:1120-1133
5. Johnson PT, Nazarian LN, Feld RI, et al. Sonographically guided renal mass biopsy: indications and efficacy. J Ultrasound Med 2001; 20:749-753
6. Lechevallier E, Andre M, Barrol D, et al. Fine-needle percutaneous biopsy of renal masses with helical CT guidance. Radiology 2000; 216:506-510
7. Eshed I, Elias S, Sidi AA. Diagnostic value of CT-guided biopsy of indeterminate renal masses. Clin Radiol 2004; 59:262-267
8. Jaff A, Molinie V, Mellot F, Guth A, Lebret T, Scherrer A. Evaluation of imaging-guided fine-needle percutaneous biopsy of renal masses. Eur Radiol 2005; 15:1721-1726
9. Neuzillet Y, Lechevallier E, Andre M, Daniel L, Coulange C. Accuracy and clinical role of fine needle percutaneous biopsy with computed tomography guidance of small (less than 4.0 cm) renal masses. J Urol 2004; 171:1802-1805
10. Edwards BK, Brown ML, Wingo PA, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2002, featuring population-based trends in cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97:1407-1427
11. Chow WH, Devesa SS, Warren JL, Fraumeni JF. Rising incidence of renal cell cancer in the United States. JAMA 1999; 281:1628-1631
12. Kondo T, Nakazawa H, Sakai F, et al. Spoke-wheel-like enhancement as an important imaging finding of chromophobe cell renal carcinoma: a retrospective analysis on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging studies. Int J Urol 2004; 11:817-824
13. Levine E, Huntrakoon M, Wetzel LH. Small renal neoplasms: clinical, pathologic, and imaging features. AJR 1989; 153:69-73
14. Li G, Cuilleron M, Gentil-Perret A, Tostain J. Characteristics of image-detected solid renal masses: implication for optimal treatment. Int J Urol 2004; 11:63-67
15. Silverman SG, Lee BY, Seltzer SE, Bloom DA, Corless CL, Adams DF. Small (≤ 3 cm) renal masses: correlation of spiral CT features and pathologic findings. AJR 1994; 163:597-605
16. Walter C, Kruessell M, Gindele A, Brochhagen HG, Gossmann A, Landwehr P. Imaging of renal lesions: evaluation of fast MRI and helical CT. Br J Radiol 2003; 76:696-703
17. Lang EK, Macchia RJ, Gayle B, et al. CT-guided biopsy of indeterminate renal cystic masses (Bosniak 3 and 2F): accuracy and impact on clinical management. Eur Radiol 2002; 12:2518-2524
18. Richter F, Kasabian NG, Irwin RJ, Watson RA, Lang EK. Accuracy of diagnosis by guided biopsy of renal mass lesions classified indeterminate by imaging studies. Urology 2000; 55:348-352
19. Caoili EM, Bude RO, Higgins EJ, Hoff DL, Nghiem HV. Evaluation of sonographically guided percutaneous core biopsy of renal masses. AJR 2002; 179:373-378
20. Shah RB, Bakshi N, Hafez KS, Wood DP Jr, Kunju LP. Image-guided biopsy in the evaluation of renal mass lesions in contemporary urological practice: indications, adequacy, clinical impact, and limitations of the pathological diagnosis. Hum Pathol 2005; 36:1309-1315
21. Wood BJ, Khan MA, McGovern F, Harisinghani M, Hahn PF, Mueller PR. Imaging guided biopsy of renal masses: indications, accuracy, and impact on clinical management. J Urol 1999; 161:1470-1474
22. Rybicki FJ, Shu KM, Cibas ES, Fielding JR, van-Sonnenberg E, Silverman SG. Percutaneous biopsy of renal masses: sensitivity and negative predictive value stratified by clinical setting and size of masses. AJR 2002; 180:1281-1287
23. Harisinghani MG, Maher MM, Gervais DA, et al. Incidence of malignancy in complex cystic renal masses (Bosniak category III): should imaging-guided biopsy precede surgery? AJR 2003; 180:755-758
24. Niceforo J, Coughlin BF. Diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma: value of fine-needle aspiration cytology in patients with metastases or contraindications to nephrectomy. AJR 1993; 161:1303-1305
25. Wunderlich H, Hindermann W, Al Mustafa AM, Reichelt O, Junker K, Schubert J. The accuracy of 250 fine needle biopsies of renal tumors. J Urol 2005; 174:44-46
26. Nakatani T, Uchida J, Han YS, et al. Renal allograft arteriovenous fistula and large pseudoaneurysm. Clin Transplant 2003; 17:9-12
27. Voiculescu A, Brause M, Engelbrecht V, Sandmann W, Pfeiffer T, Grabensee B. Hemodynamically relevant hematuria several months after biopsy of a kidney graft: an unusual cause. Clin Nephrol 2003; 59:217-221
28. Bosniak MA. Should we biopsy complex cystic renal masses (Bosniak category III)? AJR 2003; 181:1425-1426
29. (comment on AJR 2003; 180:755-758)
30. Maturen KE, Nghiem HV, Marrero JA, Higgins EJ, Fox GA, Francis IR. Lack of tumor seeding after percutaneous biopsy of hepatocellular carcinoma using co-axial cutting needle technique. AJR 2006; 187:1184-1187
31. Sanchez-Ortiz RF, Madsen LT, Bermejo CE, et al. A renal tumor in the setting of a nonrenal malignancy: when is a renal tumor biopsy appropriate? Cancer 2004; 101:2195-2201
32. Neuzillet Y, Lechevallier E, Andre M, Daniel L, Nahon O, Coulange C. Follow-up of renal oncocytoma diagnosed by percutaneous biopsy. Urology 2005; 66:1181-1185