Priorities for selection and representation in natural tasks

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 368, Issue 1628, 2013, Pages

  Tatler, Benjamin W ^a   Hirose, Yoriko ^a   Finnegan, Sarah K ^a   Pievilainen, Riina ^a   Kirtley, Clare ^a   Kennedy, Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Action; Fixation; Memory; Natural task; Priority; Video

Indexed keywords

COLOR; EXPERIMENT; MEMORY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITIZATION; PSYCHOLOGY; SELECTION; VISUALIZATION;

ACTION; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EYE FIXATION; FIXATION; HUMAN; MEMORY; NATURAL TASK; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME; UNITED KINGDOM; VIDEORECORDING; VISION;

ACTION; FIXATION; MEMORY; NATURAL TASK; PRIORITY; VIDEO;

ATTENTION; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MEMORY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SCOTLAND; TIME FACTORS; VIDEO RECORDING; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84896589531     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0066     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Buswell GT. 1935 How people look at pictures: a study of the psychology of perception in art. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2. Yarbus AL. 1967 Eye movements and vision. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
3. Tatler BW, Hayhoe MM, Land MF, Ballard DH. 2011 Eye guidance in natural vision: reinterpreting salience. J. Vision 11 (5), 5, 1-23. (doi:10.1167/ 11.5.5)
4. Fecteau J, Munoz D. 2006 Salience, relevance, and firing: a priority map for target selection. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 382-390. (doi:10.1016/j.tics. 2006.06.011)
5. Bichot NP, Schall JD. 1999 Effects of similarity and history on neural mechanisms of visual selection. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 549-554.
6. Gottlieb JP, Kusunoki M, Goldberg ME. 1998 The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex. Nature 391, 481-484.
7. Bisley JW, Mirpour K, Arcizet F, Ong WS. 2011 The role of the lateral intraparietal area in orienting attention and its implications for visual search. Eur. J. Neurosci. 33, 1982-1990. (doi:10.1111/j. 1460-9568.2011.07700.x)
8. Ballard DH, Hayhoe MM, Li F, Whitehead SD. 1992 Hand-eye coordination during sequential tasks. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 337, 331-338. discussion 338. (doi:10.1098/rstb.1992.0111)
9. Land MF, Mennie N, Rusted J. 1999 The roles of vision and eye movements in the control of activities of daily living. Perception 28, 1311-1328. (doi:10.1068/p2935)
10. Hayhoe MM, Shrivastava A, Mruczek R, Pelz JB. 2003 Visual memory and motor planning in a natural task. J. Vision 3, 49-63. (doi:10.1167/3.1.6)
11. Johansson RS, Westling G, Bäckström A, Flanagan JR. 2001 Eye-hand coordination in object manipulation. J. Neurosci. 21, 6917-6932.
12. Rothkopf CA, Ballard DH, Hayhoe MM. 2007 Task and context determine where you look. J. Vision 7(14), 16, 1-20. (doi:10.1167/7.14.16)
13. Rothkopf C. 2010 Credit assignment in multiple goal embodied visuomotor behavior. Front. Psychol. 1, 1-13. (doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00173)
14. Ballard DH, Hayhoe MM. 2009 Modelling the role of task in the control of gaze. PVIS 17, 1185-1204. (doi:10.1080/13506280902978477)
15. Hayhoe M. 2009 Visual memory in motor planning and action. In Memory for the visual world (ed. J Brockmole), pp. 117-139. New York: Psychology Press.
16. Brouwer A-M, Knill DC. 2007 The role of memory in visually guided reaching. J. Vision 7 (5), 6, 1-12. (doi:10.1167/7.5.6)
17. Colby CL, Duhamel J-R, Goldberg ME. 1995 Oculocentric spatial representation in parietal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 5, 470-481.
18. Karn KS, Møller P, Hayhoe MM. 1997 Reference frames in saccadic targeting. Exp. Brain Res. 115, 267-282. (doi:10.1007/PL00005696)
19. Aivar M, Hayhoe M, Chizk C, Mruczek R. 2005 Spatial memory and saccadic targeting in a natural task. J. Vision 5, 177-193. (doi:10.1167/5.3.3)
20. Tatler BW, Land MF. 2011 Vision and the representation of the surroundings in spatial memory. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 366, 596-610. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0188)
21. Castelhano MS, Henderson JM. 2005 Incidental visual memory for objects in scenes. PVIS 12, 1017-1040. (doi:10.1080/13506280444000634)
22. Williams CC, Henderson JM, Zacks RT. 2005 Incidental visual memory for targets and distractors in visual search. Percept. Psychophys. 67, 816-827. (doi:10.3758/BF03193535)
23. Droll JA, Hayhoe MM, Triesch J, Sullivan BT. 2005 Task demands control acquisition and storage of visual information. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. 31, 1416-1438. (doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1416)
24. Droll JA, Hayhoe MM. 2007 Trade-offs between gaze and working memory use. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. 33, 1352-1365. (doi:10.1037/0096-1523. 33.6.1352)
25. Triesch J, Ballard DH, Hayhoe M, Sullivan B. 2003 What you see is what you need? J. Vision 3, 86-94. (doi:10.1167/3.1.9)
26. Hollingworth A. 2006 Visual memory for natural scenes: evidence from change detection and visual search. PVIS 14, 781-807. (doi:10.1080/ 13506280500193818)
27. Hollingworth A. 2012 Task specificity and the influence of memory on visual search: comment on Võ and Wolfe (2012). J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. 38, 1596-1603. (doi:10.1037/a0030237)
28. Vö MLH, Wolfe JM. 2012 When does repeated search in scenes involve memory? Looking at versus looking for objects in scenes. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. 38, 23-41. (doi:10.1037/a0024147)
29. Tatler BW, Tatler SL. 2013 The influence of instructions on object memory in a real-world setting. J. Vision 13 (2), 5, 1-13. (doi:10.1167/13.2.5)
30. Maxcey-Richard AM, Hollingworth A. 2012 The strategic retention of task-relevant objects in visual working memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 39, 760-772. (doi:10.1037/a0029496)
31. Witt JK. 2011 Action's effect on perception. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 20, 201-206. (doi:10.1177/ 0963721411408770)
32. Barsalou LW. 2008 Grounded cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 59, 617-645. (doi:10.1146/annurev.psych. 59.103006.093639)
33. Tipper SP. 2010 From observation to action simulation: the role of attention, eye-gaze, emotion, and body state. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 63, 2081-2105. (doi:10.1080/17470211003624002)
34. Tipper SP, Paul MA, Hayes AE. 2006 Vision-foraction: the effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 13, 493-498. (doi:10.3758/ BF03193875)
35. Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V. 2001 Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 661-670. (doi:10.1038/35090060)
36. Flanagan J, Johansson R. 2003 Action plans used in action observation. Nature 424, 769-771. (doi:10. 1038/nature01861)
37. Rotman G. 2006 Eye movements when observing predictable and unpredictable actions. J. Neurophysiol. 96, 1358-1369. (doi:10.1152/jn. 00227.2006)
38. Hollingworth A, Henderson JM. 2002 Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. 28, 113-136. (doi:10. 1037/0096-1523.28.1.113)
39. Tatler BW, Gilchrist I, Land M. 2005 Visual memory for objects in natural scenes: from fixations to object files. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A, Hum. Exp. Psychol. 58, 931-960. (doi:10.1080/02724980443000430)
40. Jackson PL, Meltzoff AN, Decety J. 2006 Neural circuits involved in imitation and perspective-taking. Neuroimage 31, 429-439. (doi:10.1016/j. neuroimage.2005.11.026)
41. David N, Bewernick BH, Cohen MX, Newen A, Lux S, Fink GR et al. 2006 Neural representations of self versus other: visual-spatial perspective taking and agency in a virtual ball-tossing game. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 18, 898-910. (doi:10.1162/jocn. 2006.18.6.898)
42. Bates DM, Maechler M, Bolker B. 2011 lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes (R package version 0.999375-42). See http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4.
43. R Development Core Team 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Wien, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
44. Kliegl R, Hohenstein S, Yan M, McDonald SA. 2012 How preview space/time translates into preview cost/benefit for fixation durations during reading. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 66, 581-600. (doi:10.1080/ 17470218.2012.658073)
45. Burgess N. 2008 Spatial cognition and the brain. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1124, 77-97. (doi:10.1196/ annals.1440.002)
46. Burgess N. 2006 Spatial memory: how egocentric and allocentric combine. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 551-557. (doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.005)
47. Wolbers T, Hegarty M, Büchel C, Loomis JM. 2008 Spatial updating: how the brain keeps track of changing object locations during observer motion. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 1223-1230. (doi:10.1038/nn.2189)
48. Simons D, Wang R. 1998 Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes. Psychol. Sci. 9, 315-320. (doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00062)
49. Ballard DH, Hayhoe MM, Pelz JB. 1995 Memory representations in natural tasks. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 7, 66-80. (doi:10.1162/jocn.1995.7.1.66)
50. Land MF, Tatler BW. 2009 Looking and acting: vision and eye movements in natural behaviour. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
51. Pelz JB, Canosa R. 2001 Oculomotor behavior and perceptual strategies in complex tasks. Vision Res. 41, 3587-3596. (doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00245-0)
52. Mennie N, Hayhoe M, Sullivan B. 2007 Look-ahead fixations: anticipatory eye movements in natural tasks. Exp. Brain Res. 179, 427-442. (doi:10.1007/ s00221-006-0804-0)
53. Strack F, Martin LL, Stepper S. 1988 Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: a nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54, 768-777. (doi:10.1037/ 0022-3514.54.5.768)
54. Witt JK, Brockmole JR. 2012 Action alters object identification: wielding a gun increases the bias to see guns. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. 38, 1159-1167. (doi:10.1037/a0027881)
55. Tucker M, Ellis R. 2004 Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychol. 116, 185-203. (doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.01.004)