The EphA4 and EphB1 receptor tyrosine kinases and ephrin-B2 ligand regulate targeted of branchial neural crest cells

Current Biology

Volumn 7, Issue 8, 1997, Pages 561-570

  Smith, Alexa ^a   Robinson, Vicky ^a   Patel, Ketan ^a   Wilkinson, David G ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 0031213749     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(06)00255-7     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Le Douarin, N: The Neural Crest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982.
2. Erickson CA, Perris R: The role of cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions in the morphogenesis of the neural crest. Dev Biol 1993, 159:60-74.
3. Rickmann M, Fawcett JW, Keynes RJ: The migration of neural crest cells and the growth of motor axons through the rostral half of the chick somite. J Embryol Exp Morph 1985, 90:437-455.
4. Kalcheim C, Teillet M-A: Consequences of somite manipulation on the pattern of dorsal root ganglion development. Development 1989, 106:85-93.
5. Goldstein RS, Kalcheim C: Normal segmentation and size of the primary sympathetic ganglia depend upon the alternation of rostrocaudal properties of the somites. Development 1991, 112:327-334.
6. Lumsden A, Sprawson N, Graham A: Segmental origin and migration of neural crest cells in the hindbrain region of the chick embryo. Development 1991, 113:1281 -1291.
7. Serbedzija GN, Bronner-Fraser M, Fraser SE: Vital dye analysis of cranial neural crest cell migration in the mouse embryo. Development 1992, 116:297-307.
8. Kontges G, Lumsden A: Rhombencephalic neural crest segmentation is preserved throughout craniofacial ontogeny. Development 1996, 122:3229-3242.
9. Noden D: The role of the neural crest in patterning of avian cranial skeletal, connective, and muscle tissues. Dev Biol 1983, 96:144-165.
10. Hunt P, Gulisano M, Cook M, Sham M, Faiella A, Wilkinson D, et al.: A distinct Hox code for the branchial region of the head. Nature 1991, 353:861-864.
11. Rijli FM, Mark M, Lakkaraju S, Dierich A, Dolle P, Chambon P: A homeotic transformation is generated in the rostral branchial region of the head by disruption of Hoxa-2, which acts as a selector gene. Cell 1993, 75:1333-1349.
12. Gendron-Maguire M, Mallo M, Zhang M, Gridley T: Hoxa-2 mutant mice exhibit homeotic transformation of skeletal elements derived from cranial neural crest. Cell 1993, 75:1317-1331.
13. Sechrist J, Serbedzija GN, Scherson T, Fraser SE, Bronner-Fraser M: Segmental migration of the hindbrain neural crest does not arise from its segmental generation. Development 1993, 118:691-703.
14. Birgbauer E, Sechrist J, Bronner-Fraser M, Fraser S: Rhombomeric origin and rostrocaudal assortment of neural crest cells revealed by intravital microscopy. Development 1995, 121:935-945.
15. Sadaghiani B, Thiebaud CH: Neural crest development in the Xenopus laevis embryo, studied by interspecific transplantation and scanning electron microscopy. Dev Biol 1987, 124:91-110.
16. Bronner-Fraser M: Mechanisms of neural crest migration. Bioessays 1993, 15:221-230.
17. Oakley RA, Lasky CJ, Erickson CA, Tosney KW: Glycoconjugates mark a transient barrier to neural crest migration in the chicken embryo. Development 1994, 120:103-114.
18. Stern CD, Sisodiya SM, Keynes RJ: Interactions between neurites and somite cells: inhibition and stimulation of nerve growth in the chick embryo. J Embryol Exp Morph 1986, 91:209-226.
19. Krull CE, Collazo A, Fraser SE, Bronner-Fraser M: Segmental migration of trunk neural crest: time lapse analysis reveals a role for PNA-binding molecules. Development 1995, 121:3733-3743.
20. Nieto MA, Gilardi-Hebenstreit P, Charnay P, Wilkinson DG: A receptor protein tyrosine kinase implicated in the segmental patterning of the hindbrain and mesoderm. Development 1992, 116:1137-1150.
21. Henkemeyer M, Marengere LE, McGlade J, Olivier JP, Conlon RA, Holmyard DP, et al.: Immunolocalisation of the Nuk receptor tyrosine kinase suggests roles in segmental patterning of the brain and axonogenesis. Oncogene 1994, 9:1001-1014.
22. Becker N, Seitanidou T, Murphy P, Mattel M-G, Topilko P, Nieto MA, et al.: Several receptor tyrosine kinase genes of the Eph family are segmentally expressed in the developing hindbrain. Mech Dev 1994, 47:3-17.
23. Xu Q, Holder N, Patient R, Wilson SW: Spatially regulated expression of three receptor tyrosine kinase genes during gastrulation in the zebrafish. Development 1994, 120:287-299.
24. Macdonald R, Xu Q, Barth KA, Mikkola I, Holder N, Fjose A, et al.: Regulatory gene expression boundaries demarcate sites of neuronal differentiation in the embryonic zebrafish forebrain. Neuron 1994, 13:1039-1053.
25. Ellis J, Liu Q, Breitman M, Jenkins NA, Gilbert DJ, Copeland NG, et al.: Embryo brain kinase: a novel gene of the eph/elk receptor tyrosine kinase family. Mech Dev 1995, 52:319-341.
26. Scales JB, Winning RS, Renaud CS, Shea LJ, Sargent TD: Novel members of the eph receptor tyrosine kinase subfamily expressed during Xenopus development. Oncogene 1995, 11:1745-1752.
27. Pandey A, Lindberg RA, Dixit VM: Receptor orphans find a family. Curr Biol 1995, 5:986-989.
28. Brambilla R, Klein R: Telling axons where to grow - a role for Eph receptor tyrosine kinases in guidance. Mol Cell Neurosci 1995, 6:487-492.
29. Gale NW, Holland SJ, Valenzuela DM, Flenniken A, Pan L, Henkemeyer M, et al.: Eph receptors and ligands comprise two major specificity subclasses, and are reciprocally compartmentalised during embryogenesis. Neuron 1996, 17:9-19.
30. Eph Nomenclature Committee: Unified nomenclature for Eph family receptors and their ligands, the ephrins. Cell 1997, in press.
31. Davis S, Gale NW, Aldrich TH, Maisonpierre PC, Lhotak V, Pawson T, et al.: Ligands for EPH-related receptors that require membrane attachment or clustering for activity. Science 1994, 266:816-819.
32. Brambilla R, Schnapp A, Casagranda F, Labrador JP, Bergemann AD, Flanagan JG, et al.: Membrane-bound LERK2 ligand can signal through three different Eph-related receptor tyrosine kinases. EMBO J 1995, 14:3116-3126.
33. Cheng H-J, Nakamoto M, Bergemann AD, Flanagan JG: Complementary gradients in expression and binding of ELF-1 and Mek4 in development of the topographic retinotectal projection map. Cell 1995, 82:371-381.
34. Drescher U, Kremoser C, Handwerker C, Loschinger J, Noda M, Bonhoeffer F: In vitro guidance of retinal ganglion cell axons by RAGS, a 25 kDa tectal protein related to ligands for Eph receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell 1995, 82:359-370.
35. Monschau B, Kremoser C, Ohta K, Tanaka H, Kaneko T, Yamada T, et al.: Shared and distinct functions of RAGS and ELF-1 in guiding retinal axons. EMBO J 1997, 16:1258-1267.
36. Nakamoto M, Cheng H-J, Friedman GC, McLaughlin T, Hansen MJ, Yoon CH, et al.: Topographically specific effects of Elf-1 on retinal axon guidance in vitro and retinal axon mapping in vivo. Cell 1996, 86:755-766.
37. Henkemeyer M, Orioli D, Henderson JT, Saxton TM, Roder J, Pawson T, et al.: Nuk controls pathfinding of commisural axons in the mammalian central nervous system. Cell 1996, 86:35-46.
38. Xu Q, Alldus G, Holder N, Wilkinson DG: Expression of truncated Sek-1 receptor tyrosine kinase disrupts the segmental restriction of gene expression in the Xenopus and zebrafish hindbrain. Development 1995, 121:4005-4016.
39. Xu Q, Alldus G, Macdonald R, Wilkinson DG, Holder N: Function of the Eph-related receptor tyrosine kinase rtk1 in patterning of the zebrafish forebrain. Nature 1996, 381:319-322.
40. Winning RS, Sargent TD: Pagliaccio, a member of the Eph family of receptor tyrosine kinase genes, has localised expression in a subset of neural crest and neural tissues in Xenopus laevis embryos. Mech Dev 1994, 46:219-229.
41. Bradley LC, Snape A, Bhatt S, Wilkinson DG: The structure and expression of the Xenopus Krox-20 gene: conserved and divergent patterns of expression in rhombomeres and neural crest Mech Dev 1992, 40:73-84.
42. Lhotak V, Pawson T: Biological and biochemical activities of a chimeric epidermal growth factor-Elk receptor tyrosine kinase. Mol Cell Biol 1993, 13:7071-7079.
43. Bergemann AD, Cheng H-J, Brambilla R, Klein R, Flanagan JG: ELF-2, a new member of the Eph ligand family, is segmentally expressed in the region of the hindbrain and newly formed somites. Mol Cell Biol 1995, 15:4921-4929.
44. Dale L, Slack JMW: Fate map for the 32 cell stage of Xenopus laevis. Development 1987, 99:527-551.
45. Moody SA: Fates of the blastomeres of the 32 cell Xenopus embryo. Dev Biol 1987, 122:300-319.
46. Jesuthasan S: Contact inhibition/collapse and pathfinding of neural crest cells in the zebrafish trunk. Development 1996, 122:381-389.
47. Winning RS, Scales JB, Sargent TD: Disruption of cell adhesion in Xenopus embryos by Pagliaccio, an Eph-class receptor tyrosine kinase. Dev Biol 1996, 179:309-319.
48. Holland SJ, Gale NW, Mbamulu G, Yancopoulos GD, Henkemeyer M, Pawson T: Bidirectional signalling through the Eph-family receptor Nuk and its transmembrane ligands. Nature 1996, 383:722-725.
49. Bruckner K, Pasquale EB, Klein R: Tyrosine phosphorylation of transmembrane ligands for Eph receptors. Science 1997, 275:1640-1643.
50. Flenniken AM, Gale NW, Yancopoulos GD, Wilkinson DG: Distinct and overlapping expression of ligands for Eph-related receptor tyrosine kinases during mouse embryogenesis. Dev Biol 1996, 179:382-401.
51. Wang HU, Anderson DJ: Eph family transmembrane ligands can mediate repulsive guidance of trunk neural crest migration and motor axon outgrowth. Neuron 1997, 18:383-396.
52. Krull CE, Lansford R, Gale NW, Marcelle C, Collazo A, Yancopoulos GD, et al.: Interactions of Eph-related receptors and ligands confer rostrocaudal pattern to trunk neural crest migration. Curr Biol 1997, 7:571-580.
53. Walter J, Kern-Veits B, Huf J, Stolze B, Bonhoeffer F: Recognition of position-specific properties of tectal cell membranes by retinal axons in vitro. Development 1987, 101:685-696.