Defining the Errors in the Registration Process During Imageless Computer Navigation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Cadaveric Study

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 698-701

  Davis, Edward T ^a   Pagkalos, Joseph ^a   Gallie, Price A M ^b   Macgroarty, Kelly ^c   Waddell, James P ^d   Schemitsch, Emil H ^d  

^a ROYAL ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b GOLD COAST UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c Brisbane Private Hospital   (Australia)

^d ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Alignment; Computer navigation; Imageless navigation; Registration error; Total knee replacement

Indexed keywords

ANATOMIC LANDMARK; ARTICLE; CADAVER; FEMUR; HUMAN; JOINT MOBILITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; REGISTRATION; SURGICAL NAVIGATION SYSTEM; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ALIGNMENT; COMPUTER NAVIGATION; IMAGELESS NAVIGATION; REGISTRATION ERROR; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CADAVER; HUMANS; MEDICAL ERRORS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84896549778     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.06.034     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Berger R.A., Crossett L.S., Jacobs J.J., et al. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998, 356:144.
2. Insall J.N., Scuderi G.R., Komistek R.D., et al. Correlation between condylar lift-off and femoral component alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002, 403:143.
3. Jeffery R.S., Morris R.W., Denham R.A. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991, 73(5):709.
4. Bonner T.J., Eardley W.G., Patterson P., et al. The effect of post-operative mechanical axis alignment on the survival of primary total knee replacements after a follow-up of 15years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011, 93(9):1217.
5. Parratte S., Pagnano M.W., Trousdale R.T., et al. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg 2010, 92(12):2143.
6. Longstaff L.M., Sloan K., Stamp N., et al. Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24(4):570.
7. Sikorski J.M. Alignment in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90(9):1121.
8. Nicoll D., Rowley D.I. Internal rotational error of the tibial component is a major cause of pain after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010, 92(9):1238.
9. Bauwens K., Matthes G., Wich M., et al. Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89(2):261.
10. Fu Y., Wang M., Liu Y., et al. Alignment outcomes in navigated total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012, 20(6):1075.
11. Siston R.A., Cromie M.J., Gold G.E., et al. Averaging different alignment axes improves femoral rotational alignment in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 2008, 90(10):2098.
12. Siston R.A., Patel J.J., Goodman S.B., et al. The variability of femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87(10):2276.
13. Robinson M., Eckhoff D.G., Reinig K.D., et al. Variability of landmark identification in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 442:57.
14. Kinzel V., Ledger M., Shakespeare D. Can the epicondylar axis be defined accurately in total knee arthroplasty?. Knee 2005, 12(4):293.
15. Jenny J.Y., Boeri C. Low reproducibility of the intra-operative measurement of the transepicondylar axis during total knee replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 2004, 75(1):74.
16. Yau W., Leung A., Liu K., et al. Interobserver and intra-observer errors in obtaining visually selected anatomical landmarks during registration process in Non-image-based navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22(8):1150.
17. Dong H., Buxton M. Early assessment of the likely cost-effectiveness of a new technology: a Markov model with probabilistic sensitivity analysis of computer-assisted total knee replacement. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2006, 22(2):191.
18. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report. Adelaide: AOA; 2003.
19. D'Lima D.D., Hermida J.C., Chen P.C., et al. Polyethylene wear and variations in knee kinematics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, 392:124.
20. Werner F.W., Ayers D.C., Maletsky L.P., et al. The effect of valgus/varus malalignment on load distribution in total knee replacements. J Biomech 2005, 38(2):349.
21. Berend M.E., Ritter M.A., Meding J.B., et al. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 428:26.
22. Gallie P.A., Davis E.T., Macgroarty K., et al. Computer-assisted navigation for the assessment of fixed flexion in knee arthroplasty. Can J Surg 2010, 53(1):42.
23. Lehnen K., Giesinger K., Warschkow R., et al. Clinical outcome using a ligament referencing technique in CAS versus conventional technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011, 19(6):887.