Variability of landmark identification in total knee arthroplasty

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 442, Issue , 2006, Pages 57-62

  Robinson, Mitchel ^a   Eckhoff, Donald G ^a   Reinig, Karl D ^a   Bagur, Michelle M ^a   Bach, Joel M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b Department of Geology and Geological Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONFERENCE PAPER; DEVICE; FEMUR; HUMAN; MACHINE; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHOPEDICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPECTACLES; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TECHNOLOGY; THERAPEUTIC ERROR; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VIRTUAL REALITY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; HISTOLOGY; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMUR; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; OBSERVER VARIATION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 33645076292     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000197081.72341.4b     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Arima J, Whiteside LA, McCarthy DS, White SE. Femoral rotational alignment, based on the anteroposterior axis, in total knee arthroplasty in a valgus knee. J Bone Joint Surg. 1995;77A:1331-1334.
2. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Lüring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86B:682-687.
3. Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:40-47.
4. Coventry MB. Two-part total knee arthroplasty. Evolution and present status. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1973;145:29-36.
5. Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, Puhl W, Scharf H. Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:282-288.
6. Eckhoff DG, Bach JM, Spitzer VM, Reinig KD, Bagur MM, Baldini TH, Rubinstein D, Humphries S. Three-dimensional morphology of the distal part of the femur viewed in virtual reality, Part II. J Bone Joint Surg. 2003;85A(Suppl 4):97-104.
7. Eckhoff DG, Dwyer TF, Bach JM, Spitzer VM, Reinig KD. Three-dimensional morphology of the distal part of the femur viewed in virtual reality, Part I. J Bone Joint Surg. 2001;83A(Suppl 2):43-50.
8. Eliasziw M, Young SL, Woodbuty MG, Fryday-Field K. Statistical methodology for the concurrent assessment of interrater and intrarater reliability: using goniometric measurements as an example. Phys Ther. 1994;74:777-788.
9. Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Nadaud M. Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:315-318.
10. Figgie HE, Goldberg VM, Figgie MP, Inglis AE, Kelly M, Sobel M. The effect of alignment of the implant on fractures of the patella after condylar total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 1989;71A:1031-1039.
11. Green CC, Edwards TB, Wade MR, Carson EW. Reliability of the quadriceps angle measurement. Am J Knee Surg. 2001;14:97-103.
12. Haaker RG, Stockheim M. Kamp M, Proff G, Breitenfelder J, Ottersbach A. Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;433:152-159.
13. Hungerford DS, Krackow K, Kenna RV. Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Approach. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1984.
14. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg. 1991;73B:709-714.
15. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Navigated implantation of total knee endoprosthesis, a comparative study with conventional instrumentation. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2001;139:117-119.
16. Lewis P, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, Devane P. Postero-medial tibial polyethylene failure in total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;299:11-17.
17. Lonner JH, Laird MT, Stuchin SA. Effect of rotation and knee flexion on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;331:102-106.
18. Lotke PA, Ecker ML. Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg. 1977;59A:77-79.
19. Mielke RK, Clemens U, Jens JH, Kershally S. Navigation in knee endoprosthesis implantation, preliminary experiences and prospective comparative study with conventional implantation technique. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2001;139:109-116.
20. Miller MC, Berger RA, Petrella AJ, Karmas A, Rubash HE. Optimizing femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:38-45.
21. Peterson TL, Engh GA. Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1988;3:67-72.
22. Rand JA, Coventry MB. Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;232:168-173.
23. Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 1975-1997: an update with special emphasis on 41,223 knees operated on in 1988-1997. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72:503-513.
24. Sikorski JM, Chauhan S. Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery: Do we need CAOS? J Bone Joint Surg. 2003;85B:319-323.
25. Schmidt GL, Altman GT, Dougherty JT, DeMeo PJ. Reproducibility and reliability of the anatomic axis of the lower extremity. J Knee Surg. 2004;17:141-143.
26. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support, a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg. 2003;85B:830-835.
27. Stulberg SD. How accurate is current TKR instrumentation? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;416:177-184.
28. Takahashi T, Yamanaka N, Komatsu M, Ogawa Y, Yoshida S, Yamamoto H. A new computer-assisted method for measuring the tibio-femoral angle in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004;12:256-259.
29. Wasielewski RC, Galante JO, Leighty RM, Natarajan RN, Rosenberg AG. Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;299:31-43.