Toward disaster-resilient cities: Characterizing resilience of infrastructure systems with expert judgments

Risk Analysis

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 416-434

  Chang, Stephanie E ^a   Mcdaniels, Timothy ^a   Fox, Jana ^a   Dhariwal, Rajan ^a   Longstaff, Holly ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Disasters; Expert judgment; Infrastructure; Interdependencies; Resilience

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKES; ITERATIVE METHODS; RECOVERY;

EXPERT JUDGMENT; INFRASTRUCTURE; INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES; INFRASTRUCTURE VULNERABILITIES; INTERDEPENDENCIES; METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH; REGIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE; RESILIENCE;

DISASTERS;

DISASTER MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM RESILIENCE; FLOOD; HUMAN ACTIVITY; INFRASTRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT; RISK FACTOR; TELECOMMUNICATION; URBAN AREA; VULNERABILITY;

BRITISH COLUMBIA; CANADA; VANCOUVER [BRITISH COLUMBIA];

EID: 84896549307     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/risa.12133     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Mileti DS. Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the US. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999.
2. Burby RJ, Beatley T, Berke PR, Deyle RE, French SP, Godschalk DR, Kaiser EJ, Kartez JD, May PJ, Olshansky R, Paterson RG, Platt RH. Unleashing the power of planning in creating disaster-resilient communities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1999; 65(3):247-258.
3. Godschalk DR. Urban hazard mitigation: Creating resilient cities. Natural Hazards Review, 2003; 4(3):136-143.
4. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UN/ISDR). Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters. Geneva, Report No.: UN/ISDR-07-2007-Geneva.
5. Berke PR, Campanella TJ. Planning for postdisaster resiliency. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2006; 604(1):192-207.
6. Burby RJ. Cooperating with Nature: Confronting Natural Hazards with Land Use Planning for Sustainable Communities. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press, 1998.
7. Burby RJ. Plans, code enforcement, and damage reduction: Evidence from the Northridge earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 1998; 14(1):59-74.
8. Nelson AC, French SP. Plan quality and mitigating damage from natural disasters: A case study of the Northridge earthquake with planning policy considerations. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2002; 68(2):194-207.
9. Brody SD, Zahran S, Maghelal P, Grover H, Highfield WE. The rising costs of floods: Examining the impact of planning and development decisions on property damage in Florida. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2007; 73(3):330-345.
10. Schwab J. Planning for Post-Disaster Recovery and Reconstruction. Chicago, IL: American Planning Association, 1998.
11. Olshansky RB. Planning after Hurricane Katrina. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2006; 72(2):147-153.
12. Gordon P, Richardson HW, Davis B. Transport-related impacts of the Northridge earthquake. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, 1998; 1(2):21-36.
13. Nojima N, Kameda H. Lifeline interactions in the Hanshin-Awaji earthquake disaster. Pp. 253-264 in Hamada H, Ohmachi T, Ohbo N (eds). The 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu Earthquake: Investigation into Damage to Civil Engineering Structures. Tokyo: Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 1996.
14. Mendonca D, Wallace WA. Impacts of the 2001 World Trade Center attack on New York City critical infrastructures. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2006; 12(4):260-270.
15. Chang SE, McDaniels TL, Mikawoz J, Reed D. Infrastructure failure interactions in extreme events: The 1998 ice storm. Natural Hazards, 2006; 41(2):337-358.
16. McDaniels T, Chang S, Peterson K, Mikawoz J, Reed D. Empirical framework for characterizing infrastructure failure interdependencies. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2007; 13(3):175-184.
17. Keeney RL, von Winterfeldt D. On the uses of expert judgment on complex technical problems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1989; 36(2):83-86.
18. Keeney RL, von Winterfeldt D. Eliciting probabilities from experts in complex technical problems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1991; 38(3):191-201.
19. Morgan MG, Henrion M, Small M. Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
20. Innes JE, Booher DE. Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1999; 65(4):412-423.
21. McDaniels TL, Gregory RS, Fields D. Democratizing risk management: Successful public involvement in local water management decisions. Risk Analysis, 1999; 19(3):497-510.
22. Kaplan S, Garrick BJ. On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis, 1981; 1(1):11-27.
23. Cooke R. Experts in Uncertainty: Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
24. Carpenter S, Walker B, Anderies JM, Abel NA. From metaphor to measurement: Resilience of what to what? Ecosystems, 2001; 4(8):765-781.
25. Holling CS. Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. Pp. 31-44 in Schulze P (ed). Engineering Within Ecological Constraints. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996.
26. Bruneau M, Chang SE, Eguchi RT, Lee GC, O'Rourke TD, Reinhorn AM, Shinozuka M, Tierney K, Wallace WA, von Winterfeldt D. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra, 2003; 19(4):733-752.
27. Chang SE, Shinozuka M. Measuring improvements in the disaster resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra, 2004; 20(3):739-755.
28. Morgan K. The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies, 1997; 31(5):491-503.
29. Lebel L, Anderies JM, Campbell B, Folke C, Hatfield-Dodds S, Hughes TP, Wilson J. Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 2006; 11(1):1-19.
30. Simpson DM, Rockaway TD, Weigel TA, Coomes PA, Holloman CO. Framing a new approach to critical infrastructure modelling and extreme events. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure, 2005; 1(2/3):125-143.
31. Rose A, Liao SY. Modeling regional economic resilience to disasters: A computable general equilibrium analysis of water service disruptions. Journal of Regional Science, 2005; 45(1):75-112.
32. Kajitani Y, Tatano H. Estimation of lifeline resilience factors based on surveys of Japanese industries. Earthquake Spectra, 2009; 25(4):755-776.
33. Dueñas-Osorio L, Craig JI, Goodno BJ. Seismic response of critical interdependent networks. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2007; 36(2):285-306.
34. Min HSJ, Beyeler W, Brown T, Son YJ, Jones AT. Toward modeling and simulation of critical national infrastructure interdependencies. IIE Transactions, 2007; 39(1):57-71.
35. Haime YY, Jiang P. Leontief-based model of risk in complex interconnected infrastructures. Journal of Infrastructure System, 2001; 7(1):1-12.
36. Apostolakis GE, Lemon DM. A screening methodology for the identification and ranking of infrastructure vulnerabilities due to terrorism. Risk Analysis, 2005; 25(2):361-376.
37. Lian CY, Santos JR, Haimes YY. Extreme risk analysis of interdependent economic and infrastructure sectors. Risk Analysis, 2007; 27(4):1053-1064.
38. McNally RK, Lee SW, Xiang WN. Learning the critical infrastructure interdependencies through an ontology-based information system. Environment and Planning B-Planning & Design, 2007; 34(6):1103-1124.
39. Brown C, Chang SE, McDaniels T. Utility provider liability for electrical failure: Implications for interdependent critical infrastructure. Electricity Journal, 2006; 19(5):69-81.
40. Chang SE. Evaluating disaster mitigations: Methodology for urban infrastructure systems. Natural Hazards Reviews, 2003; 4(4):186-196.
41. Feinberg LE. FOIA, federal information policy, and information availability in a post-9/11 world. Government Information Quarterly, 2004; 21(4):439-460.
42. Hammitt H. Less safe: The dismantling of public information systems after 9/11. Social Science Computer Review, 2005; 23(4):429-438.
43. Fiorino DJ. Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 1990; 15(2):226-243.
44. Gregory R, Failing L, Ohlson D, McDaniels TL. Some pitfalls of an overemphasis on science in environmental risk management decisions. Journal of Risk Research, 2006; 9(7):717-735.
45. Slovic P. Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield (reprinted from Environment, Ethics, and Behavior, pp. 277-313, 1997). Risk Analysis, 1999; 19(4):689-701.
46. Keeney RL. Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision Making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.
47. MacNamee P, Celona J. In Celona J (ed). Decision Analysis for the Professional with Supertree. Menlo Park, CA: Scientific Press, 1987.
48. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
49. Analyzing Infrastructures for Disaster-Resilient Communities. Available at: http://www.chs.ubc.ca/dprc_koa/, Accessed September 2013.
50. Rinaldi SA, Peerenboom JP, Kelly TK. Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 2001; 21(6):11-25.
51. Chang SE, McDaniels TL, Reed D. Mitigation of extreme event risks: Electric power outage and infrastructure failure interactions. Pp. 70-90 in Richardson HW, Gordon P, Moore JE II (eds). The Economic Impacts of Terrorist Attacks. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2005.
52. Cox LA. What's wrong with risk matrices? Risk Analysis, 2008; 28(2):497-512.
53. Haimes YY, Horowitz BM, Lambert JH, Santos JR, Lian C, Crowther KG. Inoperability input-output model for interdependent infrastructure sectors. I: Theory and methodology. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2005; 11(2):67-79.
54. Santos JR, Haimes YY. Modeling the demand reduction input-output (I-O) inoperability due to terrorism of interconnected infrastructures. Risk Analysis, 2004; 24(6):1437-1451.
55. Zickfeld K, Levermann A, Morgan MG, Kuhlbrodt T, Rahmstorf S, Keith DW. Expert judgements on the response of the Atlantic Meridional overturning circulation to climate change. Climatic Change, 2007; 82(3):235-265.
56. McDaniels T, Mills T, Ohlson D, Gregory R. Exploring robust alternatives for climate adaptation in forest-land management through expert judgments. Risk Analysis, 2012; 32(12):2098-2112.
57. Arvai JL, Froschauer A. Good decisions, bad decisions: The interaction of process and outcome in evaluations of decision quality. Journal of Risk Research, 2010; 13(7):845-859.
58. Stewart TR, Lusk CM. 7 components of judgmental forecasting skill: Implications for research and the improvement of forecasts. Journal of Forecasting, 1994; 13(7):579-599.
59. Armstrong JS. Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic, 2001.
60. Linstone HA, Turoff M. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Advanced Book Program, 1975.
61. Soll JB, Klayman J. Overconfidence in interval estimates. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 2004; 30(2):299-314.
62. Kroeger W. Critical infrastructures at risk: A need for a new conceptual approach and extended analytical tools. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2008; 93(12):1781-1787.
63. Procyk A. Creating Alternatives for Improving Infrastructure Interdependency Resilience, 2010. Available at: http://www.chs.ubc.ca/dprc_koa/pdf_files/PR_No3_Creating%20Alternatives.pdf, Accessed August 2013.
64. Procyk A. Setting Priorities for Improving Infrastructure Interdependency Resilience, 2010. Available at: http://www.chs.ubc.ca/dprc_koa/pdf_files/PR_No4_Setting%20Priorities.pdf, Accessed August 2013.