The rising costs of floods: Examining the impact of planning and development decisions of property damage in Florida

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 330-345

  Brody, Samuel D ^a,b,c   Zahran, Sammy ^d   Maghelal, Praveen ^e   Grover, Himanshu ^a   Highfield, Wesley E ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Environmental Planning and Sustainability Research Unit ^*  (United States)

^c Center for Texas Beaches and Shores   (United States)

^d Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

^e FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISASTER MANAGEMENT; FLOOD; FLOOD DAMAGE; HAZARD MANAGEMENT; NATURAL HAZARD;

FLORIDA [UNITED STATES]; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 35348946420     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360708977981     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Ammon, D. C., Wayne, H. C., & Hearney, J. P. (1981). Wetlands' use for water management in Florida. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 107, 315-327.
2. Arnold, C. L., Jr., & Gibbons, C. J. (1996). Impervious surface coverage: The emergence of a key environmental indicator. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(2), 243-258.
3. Association of State Floodplain Managers. (2000). National flood programs in review-2000. Madison, WI: Author.
4. Birkland, T., Burby, R., Conrad, D., Cortner, H., & Mitchner, W. (2003). River ecology and flood hazard mitigation. Natural Hazards Review, 4(1), 46-54.
5. Brody, S. D., Carassco, V., & Highfield, W. (2003). Evaluating ecosystem management capabilities at the local level in Florida: Identifying policy gaps using geographic information systems. Environmental Management, 32(6), 661-681.
6. Brody, S. D., Highfield, W., & Carrasco, V. (2004). Measuring the collective capabilities of local jurisdictions to manage ecosystems in Southern Florida. Journal of Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(1), 33-50.
7. Brody, S. D., & Highfield, W. E. (2005). Does planning work? Testing the implementation of local environment planning in Florida. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 159-176.
8. Brody, S. D., Highfield, W. E., Ryu, H., & Spanel-Weber, L. (2007). Examining the relationship between wetland alteration and watershed flooding in Texas and Florida. Natural Hazards, 40(2), 413-428.
9. Brody, S. D., Highfield, W. E., & Thornton, S. (2006). Planning at the urban fringe: An examination of the factors influencing nonconforming development patterns in Southern Florida. Environment and Planning B, 33, 75-96.
10. Brody, S. D., Zahran, S., Highfield, W. E., Grover, H., & Vedlitz, A. (in press). Identifying the impact of the built environment on flood damage in Texas. Disasters.
11. Brezonik, P. L., & Stadelman, T. H. (2002). Analysis and predictive models of stormwater runoff volumes, loads and pollutant concentrations from watersheds in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, Minnesota, USA. Water Resources, 36(7), 1743-1757.
12. Bullock, A., & Acreman, M. (2003). The role of wetlands in the hydrological cycle. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 7(3), 358-389.
13. Burby, R. J. (2005). Have state comprehensive planning mandates reduced insured losses from natural disasters? Natural Hazards Review, 6(2), 67-81.
14. Burby, R. J., Bollens, S., Haloway, J., Kaiser, E. J., Mullan, D., & Schafer, J. (1988). Cities under water: A comparative evaluation of ten cities' efforts to manage floodplain land use. Boulder: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.
15. Burby, R. J., French, S. P., & Cigler, B. A. (1985). Flood plain land use management: A national assessment. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
16. Burges, S. J., Wigmosta, M. S., & Meena, J. M. (1998). Hydrological effects of land-use change in a zero-order catchment. Journal of Hydrological Engineering, 3(2), 86-97.
17. Burns, D., Vitvar, T., McDonnell, J., Hassert, J., Duncan, J., & Kendall, C. (2005). Effects of suburban development on runoff generation in the Croton River Basin, New York, USA. Journal of Hydrology, 311(1-4), 266-281.
18. Carter, R. W. (1961). Magnitude and frequency of floods in suburban areas. In Short papers in geologic and hydrologic sciences (U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 424-B; pp. B9-B11).
19. Daniel, C. (1981). Hydrology, geology, and soils of pocosins: A comparison of natural and altered systems. In C. J. Richardson (Ed.), Pocosins: A conference on alternate uses of the coastal plain freshwater wetlands of North Carolina (pp. 69-108). Stroudsburg, PA: Hutchinson Ross.
20. Duane, T., & Leopold, L. B. (1978). Water in environmental planning. New York: Freeman Press.
21. Espey, W. H., Morgan, C. W., & Masch, F. D. (1965). A study of some effects of urbanization on storm runoff from a small watershed (Tech. Rep. 44D 07-6501 CRWR-2). Austin: University of Texas, Center for Research in Water Resources.
22. Federal Emergency Management Agency. (1997). MultiHazard identification and risk assessment. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
23. Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2000). South Florida disaster update: More than $170 million approved; applications top 51,000 mark as Dec. 4 deadline approaches (Release Number 1345-27). Retrieved July 7, 2005, from http://www.fema.gov/news/ newsrelease.fema?id=7772
24. Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2006). Community rating system state profile: Florida. Washington, DC: Author.
25. Godschalk, D. R., Beatley, T., Berke, P., Brower, D., & Kaiser, E. J. (1999). Natural hazard mitigation: Recasting disaster policy and planning. Washington, DC: Island Press.
26. Harding, D., & Parker, D. (1974). Flood hazards at Shrewsbury, United Kingdom. In G. F. White (Ed.), Natural hazards: Local, national, and global (pp. 43-52). New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Hazards Research Lab. (2006). The spatial hazard events and losses database for the United States, Version 4.1 (Online Database). Columbia: University of South Carolina. Retrieved October 2, 2006 from http://www.sheldus.org
28. Heikuranen, L. (1976). Comparison between runoff condition on a virgin peatland and a forest drainage area. Proceedings of the Fifth International Peat Congress, 76-86.
29. Hertzler, R. A. (1961). Corps of engineers experience relating to floodplain regulation. In G. F. White (Ed.) Papers on flood problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Hey, D. L. (2002). Modern drainage design: The pros, the cons, and the future. Hydrological Science and Technology, 18(1-4), 89-99.
31. Highfield, W. E., & Brody, S. D. (2006). The price of permits: Measuring the economic impacts of wetland development on flood damages in Florida. Natural Hazards Review, 7(3), 23-30.
32. Hirsch, R. M., Walker, J. F., Day, J. C., & Kallio, R. (1990). The influence of man on hydrological systems. In M. G. Wolman & H. C. Riggs (Eds.), Surface water hydrology (pp. 329-359). Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America.
33. Horton, R. E. (1932). Drainage basin characteristics. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 13, 350-361.
34. Hsu, M. H., Chen, S. H., & Chang, T. J. (2000). Inundation simulation for urban drainage basin with storm sewer system. Journal of Hydrology, 234(1-2), 21-37.
35. Johnston, C. A., Detenbeck, N. E., & Niemi, G. J. (1990). The cumulative effect of wetlands on stream water quality and quantity. A landscape approach. Biogeochemistry, 10(2), 105-141.
36. Kunreuther, H. J., & Roth. (1998). Paying the price: The status and role of insurance against natural disasters in the US. Washington, DC: John Henry Press.
37. Larson, L., & Plasencia, D. (2001). No adverse impact: A new direction in floodplain management policy. Natural Hazard Review, 2(4), 167-181.
38. Leopold, L. B. (1994). A view of the river. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39. Lewis, W. M. (2001). Wetlands explained: Wetland science, policy, and politics in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
40. Mileti, D. S. (1999). Disasters by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph-Henry Press.
41. Mitch, W. J., & Gosselink, J. G. (2000). Wetlands (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
42. Moglen, G. E., & Kim, S. (2007). Limiting imperviousness: Are threshold-based policies a good idea? Journal of the American Planning Association, 73(2), 161-171.
43. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Environmental and Societal Impacts Group, and the Atmospheric Policy Program of the American Meteorological Society. (2001). Extreme weather sourcebook 2001: Economic and othersocietal impacts related to hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, lightning, and other U.S. weatherpbenomena. Boulder, CO: National Center for Atmospheric Research.
44. National Climatic Data Center. (2005). Storm events database. Retrieved December 2, 2005, from http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov /cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwEvent-Storm
45. Novitski, R. P. (1979). Hydrologic characteristics of Wisconsin's wetlands and their influence on floods, streamflow and sediment. In P. E. Greeson, J. R. Clark, & J. E. Clark (Eds.), Wetland functions and values: the state of our understanding (pp. 377-388). Minneapolis, MN: American Water Resources Association.
46. Novitski, R. P. (1985). The effects of lakes and wetlands on flood flows and base flows in selected northern and eastern states. Proceedings of the Conference on Wetlands of the Chesapeake (pp. 143-154). Easton, MD: Environmental Law Institute.
47. Ogawa, H., & Male, J. W. (1986). Simulating the flood mitigation role of wetlands. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 112(1), 114-128.
48. Paul, M. J., & Meyer, J. L. (2001). Streams in the urban landscape. Annual Review of Ecological Systems, 32 (1), 333-365.
49. Petts, G. E. (1984). Impounded rivers. Perspectives for ecological management. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
50. Pielke, R. A. (1996). Midwest flod of 1993: Weather, climate, and societal impacts. Boulder, CO: National Center for Atmospheric Research.
51. Pielke, R. A. (1999). Nine fallacies of floods. Climatic Change, 42(2), 413-438.
52. Pielke, R. A., & Downton, M. W. (2000). Precipitation and damaging floods: Trends in the United States, 1932-1997. Journal of Climate, 13(20), 3625-3637.
53. Pielke, R. A., Downton, M. W., & Barnard Miller, J. Z. (2002). Flood damage in the United States, 1926-2000. A reanalysis of national weather service estimates. Boulder, CO: University Corporation for Atmospheric Research.
54. Platt, R. H. (1999). Disasters and democracy. The politics of extreme natural events. Washington, DC: Island Press.
55. Power, M. E., Dietrich, W. E. & Finlay, J. C. (1996). Dams and downstream aquatic biodiversity: Potential food web consequences of hydrologic and geomorphic change. Environmental Management, 20(6), 887-895.
56. Rose, S., & Peters, N. (2001). Effects of urbanization on streamflow in the Atlanta Area (Georgia, USA): A comparative hydrological approach. Hydrological Proceedings, 15, 1441-1457.
57. Schuster, W. D., Bonta, J., Thurston, H., Warnemuende, E., & Smith, D. R. (2005). Impacts of impervious surface on watershed hydrology: A review. Urban Water Journal 2(4), 263-275.
58. Seaburn, G. E. (1969). Effects of urban development on direct runoff to East Meadow Brook, Nassau County, Long Island, New York. Professional Paper 627-B. Washington, DC: U.S. Geological Survey.
59. Stein, J., Moreno, P, Conrad, D., & Ellis, S. (2000). Troubled waters: Congress, the Corps of Engineers, and wasteful water projects, Washington, DC: Taxpayers for Common Sense and National Wildlife Federation.
60. Tobin, G. A. (1995). The levee love affair: A stormy relationship. Water Resources Bulletin, 31 (3), 359-367.
61. Tourbier, J. T., & Westmacott, R. (1981). Water resources protection technology: A handbook of measures to protect water resources in land development. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
62. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. (2002). Services to the public: Flood damage reduction. Retrieved July 7, 2005, from http:// www.usace.army.mil/public.html#Flood
63. Verry, E. S., & Boelter, D. H. (1979). Peatland hydrology. In, P. E. Greeson, J. R. Clark, & J. E. Clark (Eds.), Wetland functions and values: The state of our understanding. Proceedings of the symposium held in Lake Buena Vista, Florida (pp. 389-402). Minneapolis, MN: American Water Resources Association.
64. White, G. F. (1945). Human adjustment to floods: A geographical approach to the flood problem in the United States (Research Paper No. 29). Chicago: University of Chicago, Department of Geography.
65. White, G. F. (1975). Flood hazard in the United States: A research assessment. Boulder: Institute of Behavioral Sciences, University of Colorado.
66. White, M. D., & Greer, K. A. (2006). The effects of watershed urbanization on the stream hydrology and riparian vegetation of Los Pen?asquitos Creek, California. Landscape and Urban Planning, 74(2), 125-138.
67. Zahran, S., Brody, S. D., Peacock, W., Grover, H., & Vedlitz, A. (in press). Social vulnerability and flood casualties in Texas, 1997-2001. Disasters.