Do novices and advanced students benefit differently from worked examples and ITS?

Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 20-29

  Shareghi Najar, Amir ^a   Mitrovic, Antonija ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Intelligent tutoring systems; Novice and advanced students; Problem solving; Worked examples

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; PROBLEM SOLVING;

ADAPTIVE FEEDBACK; CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE; EFFECTIVE APPROACHES; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; LEARNING OUTCOME; SELF EXPLANATIONS; WORKED EXAMPLES;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84896483856     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science, 26(2), 147-179.
2. Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. (2000). Learning from Examples: Instructional Principles from the Worked Examples Research. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 181-214.
3. Chi, M T H, & VanLehn, K. A. (1991). The content of physics self-explanations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 69-105.
4. Chi, M.T.H., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M. H., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive science, 18(3), 439-477.
5. Clark, R. C., Nguyen, F., & Sweller, J. (2006). Efficiency in learning: evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. Jossey-Bass.
6. Hausmann, R., Nokes, T., VanLehn, K., & Gershman, S. (2009). The design of self-explanation prompts: The fit hypothesis. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2626-2631).
7. Hilbert, T. S., & Renkl, A. (2009). Learning how to use a computer-based concept-mapping tool: Self-explaining examples helps. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 267-274.
8. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1998). Levels of Expertise and Instructional Design. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 40, 1-17.
9. Kim, R. S., Weitz, R., Heffernan, N. T., & Krach, N. (2007). Tutored Problem Solving vs . " Pure " Worked Examples. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, 3121-3126.
10. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
11. Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H., Mark, M. A., & others. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED), 8, 30-43.
12. McLaren, B., & Isotani, S. (2011). When Is It Best to Learn with All Worked Examples? In G. Biswas, S. Bull, J. Kay, & A. Mitrovic (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education (Vol. 6738, pp. 222-229). Springer Berlin/Heidelberg.
13. Mitrovic, A. (2003). An Intelligent SQL Tutor on the Web. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13(2-4), 173-197.
14. Mitrovic, A. (2012). Fifteen years of constraint-based tutors: what we have achieved and where we are going. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 22(1-2), 39-72.
15. Mitrovic, A., & Weerasinghe, A. (2009). Revisiting Ill-Definedness and the Consequences for ITSs. In V. D. R. Mizoguchi (Ed.), The 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 375-382). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
16. Rourke, A., & Sweller, J. (2009). The worked-example effect using ill-defined problems: Learning to recognise designers' styles. Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 185-199.
17. Salden, R. J. C. M., Aleven, V., Schwonke, R., & Renkl, A. (2009). The expertise reversal effect and worked examples in tutored problem solving. Instructional Science, 38(3), 289-307. doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9107-8.
18. Schwonke, R., Renkl, A., Krieg, C., Wittwer, J., Aleven, V., & Salden, R. (2009). The worked-example effect: Not an artefact of lousy control conditions. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 258-266.
19. Shareghi Najar, A., & Mitrovic, A. (2013). Examples and Tutored Problems: How can Self-Explanation Make a Difference to Learning? Proceedings of the 16h International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education.
20. Sweller, J. (2006). The worked example effect and human cognition. Learning and Instruction, 16(2), 165-169.
21. Sweller, J, Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer.
22. Sweller, John, & Cooper, G. A. (1985). The Use of Worked Examples as a Substitute for Problem Solving in Learning Algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 59-89.
23. Van Gog, T., Kester, L., & Paas, F. (2011). Effects of worked examples, example-problem, and problem-example pairs on novices' learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(3), 212-218.
24. Van Gog, T., & Rummel, N. (2010). Example-Based Learning: Integrating Cognitive and Social-Cognitive Research Perspectives. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 155-174.
25. Vanlehn, K. (2011). The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197-221.