How to report reliability in orthodontic research: Part 1

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 144, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 156-161

  Donatelli, Richard E ^a   Lee, Shin Jae ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881122965     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.03.014     Document Type: Editorial

References (14)

1. Fleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1985.
2. BeGole EA. Statistics for the orthodontist. In: Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL, editors. Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. St Louis: Mosby; 2000.
3. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. London, United Kingdom: George Allen & Unwin; 1940.
4. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1: 307-10.
5. Gabriel DB, Southard KA, Qian F, Marshall SD, Franciscus RG, Southard TE. Cervical vertebrae maturation method: poor reproducibility. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:478.e1-7.
6. Brunette DM. Critical thinking: understanding and evaluating dental research. Chicago: Quintessence; 1996. p. 99-112.
7. Polychronopoulou A, Pandis N, Eliades T. Assessment of publication bias in dental specialty journals. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2010; 10:207-11.
8. Koletsi D, Karagianni A, Pandis N, Makou M, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Are studies reporting significant results more likely to be published? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:632.e1-5.
9. Polychronopoulou A, Pandis N, Eliades T. Appropriateness of reporting statistical results in orthodontics: the dominance of P values over confidence intervals. Eur J Orthod 2011;33:22-5.
10. Linnet K. Limitations of the paired t-test for evaluation of method comparison data. Clin Chem 1999;45:314-5.
11. Battagel JM. A comparative assessment of cephalometric errors. Eur J Orthod 1993;15:305-14.
12. Power G, Breckon J, Sherriff M, McDonald F. Dolphin imaging software: an analysis of the accuracy of cephalometric digitization and orthognathic prediction. Int J OralMaxillofac Surg 2005;34:619-26.
13. Johnson RA, Wichern DW. Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education; 2007.
14. R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2013.