Neural responses to visual scenes reveals inconsistencies between fMRI adaptation and multivoxel pattern analysis

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 530-543

  Epstein, Russell A ^a   Morgan, Lindsay K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

FMRI adaptation; Multivoxel pattern analysis; Parahippocampal cortex; Retrosplenial cortex; Spatial navigation; Visual scene recognition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANATOMIC LANDMARK; ARTICLE; BOLD SIGNAL; BRAIN MAPPING; CLASSIFIER; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; MULTIVOXEL PATTERN ANALYSIS; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROTRANSMISSION; NORMAL HUMAN; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL PLACE AREA; RETINA IMAGE; RETROSPLENIAL CORTEX; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEURONS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84857141490     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.042     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Aguirre G.K. Continuous carry-over designs for fMRI. Neuroimage 2007, 35(4):1480-1494.
2. Arcaro M.J., McMains S.A., Singer B.D., Kastner S. Retinotopic organization of human ventral visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29(34):10638-10652.
3. Bar M. Visual objects in context. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2004, 5(8):617-629.
4. Bar M., Aminoff E. Cortical analysis of visual context. Neuron 2003, 38:347-358.
5. Biederman I. Perceiving real-world scenes. Science 1972, 177(43):77-80.
6. Cant J.S., Goodale M.A. Attention to form or surface properties modulates different regions of human occipitotemporal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17(3):713-731.
7. Cox D.D., Savoy R.L. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) "brain reading": Detecting and classifying distributed patterns of fMRI activity in human visual cortex. Neuroimage 2003, 19(2 Part 1):261-270.
8. De Baene W., Vogels R. Effects of adaptation on the stimulus selectivity of macaque inferior temporal spiking activity and local field potentials. Cerebral Cortex 2010, 20(9):2145-2165.
9. Drucker D.M., Aguirre G.K. Different spatial scales of shape similarity representation in lateral and ventral LOC. Cerebral Cortex 2009, 19(10):2269-2280.
10. Epstein R., DeYoe E.A., Press D.Z., Rosen A.C., Kanwisher N. Neuropsychological evidence for a topographical learning mechanism in parahippocampal cortex. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2001, 18(6):481-508.
11. Epstein R., Graham K.S., Downing P.E. Viewpoint-specific scene representations in human parahippocampal cortex. Neuron 2003, 37:865-876.
12. Epstein R., Kanwisher N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 1998, 392(6676):598-601.
13. Epstein R.A. Parahippocampal and retrosplenial contributions to human spatial navigation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008, 12(10):388-396.
14. Epstein R.A., Higgins J.S. Differential parahippocampal and retrosplenial involvement in three types of visual scene recognition. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17(7):1680-1693.
15. Epstein R.A., Higgins J.S., Jablonski K., Feiler A.M. Visual scene processing in familiar and unfamiliar environments. Journal of Neurophysiology 2007, 97(5):3670-3683.
16. Epstein R.A., Higgins J.S., Thompson-Schill S.L. Learning places from views: Variation in scene processing as a function of experience and navigational ability. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2005, 17(1):73-83.
17. Epstein R.A., Parker W.E., Feiler A.M. Where am I now? Distinct roles for parahippocampal and retrosplenial cortices in place recognition. Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27(23):6141-6149.
18. Epstein R.A., Parker W.E., Feiler A.M. Two kinds of FMRI repetition suppression? Evidence for dissociable neural mechanisms. Journal of Neurophysiology 2008, 99(6):2877-2886.
19. Fang F., Murray S.O., He S. Duration-dependent FMRI adaptation and distributed viewer-centered face representation in human visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17(6):1402-1411.
20. Fei-Fei L., Iyer A., Koch C., Perona P. What do we perceive in a glance of a real-world scene?. Journal of Vision 2007, 7(1):10.
21. Freeman J., Brouwer G.J., Heeger D.J., Merriam E.P. Orientation decoding depends on maps, not columns. Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31(13):4792-4804.
22. Friston K. A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 2005, 360(1456):815-836.
23. Greene M.R., Oliva A. Recognition of natural scenes from global properties: Seeing the forest without representing the trees. Cognitive Psychology 2009, 58(2):137-176.
24. Grill-Spector K., Henson R., Martin A. Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10(1):14-23.
25. Grill-Spector K., Malach R. fMR-adaptation: A tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. Acta Psychologica 2001, 107(1-3):293-321.
26. Habib M., Sirigu A. Pure topographical disorientation - A definition and anatomical basis. Cortex 1987, 23(1):73-85.
27. Haxby J.V., Gobbini M.I., Furey M.L., Ishai A., Schouten J.L., Pietrini P. Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science 2001, 293(5539):2425-2430.
28. Hung C.P., Kreiman G., Poggio T., DiCarlo J.J. Fast readout of object identity from macaque inferior temporal cortex. Science 2005, 5749:863-866.
29. Janzen G., van Turennout M. Selective neural representation of objects relevant for navigation. Nature Neuroscience 2004, 7(6):673-677.
30. Kaliukhovich D.A., Vogels R. Stimulus repetition probability does not affect repetition suppression in macaque inferior temporal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2010.
31. Kamitani Y., Tong F. Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8(5):679-685.
32. Kourtzi Z., Kanwisher N. Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex. Science 2001, 293(5534):1506-1509.
33. Kravitz D., Peng C., Baker C.I. The structure of scene representations across the ventral visual pathway. Journal of Vision 2010, 10(7):1224.
34. Kriegeskorte N., Goebel R., Bandettini P. Information-based functional brain mapping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006, 103(10):3863-3868.
35. Liu Y., Murray S.O., Jagadeesh B. Time course and stimulus dependence of repetition-induced response suppression in inferotemporal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 2009, 101(1):418-436.
36. MacEvoy S.P., Epstein R.A. Constructing scenes from objects in human occipitotemporal cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2011, 14(10):1323-1329.
37. Mendez M.F., Cherrier M.M. Agnosia for scenes in topographagnosia. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41(10):1387-1395.
38. Mitchell T.M., Shinkareva S.V., Carlson A., Chang K.M., Malave V.L., Mason R.A., et al. Predicting human brain activity associated with the meanings of nouns. Science 2008, 320(5880):1191-1195.
39. Morgan L.K., Macevoy S.P., Aguirre G.K., Epstein R.A. Distances between real-world locations are represented in the human hippocampus. Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31(4):1238-1245.
40. Nichols T.E., Holmes A.P. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples. Human Brain Mapping 2002, 15(1):1-25.
41. Norman K.A., Polyn S.M., Detre G.J., Haxby J.V. Beyond mind-reading: Multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10(9):424-430.
42. Op de Beeck H.P. Probing the mysterious underpinnings of multi-voxel fMRI analyses. Neuroimage 2010, 50(2):567-571.
43. Panis S., Wagemans J., Op de Beeck H.P. Dynamic norm-based encoding for unfamiliar shapes in human visual cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 23(7):1829-1843.
44. Park S., Brady T.F., Greene M.R., Oliva A. Disentangling scene content from spatial boundary: Complementary roles for the parahippocampal place area and lateral occipital complex in representing real-world scenes. Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31(4):1333-1340.
45. Park S., Chun M.M. Different roles of the parahippocampal place area (PPA) and retrosplenial cortex (RSC) in panoramic scene perception. Neuroimage 2009, 47(4):1747-1756.
46. Potter M.C. Meaning in visual search. Science 1975, 187(4180):965-966.
47. Renninger L.W., Malik J. When is scene identification just texture recognition?. Vision Research 2004, 44:2301-2311.
48. Sapountzis P., Schluppeck D., Bowtell R., Peirce J.W. A comparison of fMRI adaptation and multivariate pattern classification analysis in visual cortex. Neuroimage 2010, 49(2):1632-1640.
49. Sasaki Y., Rajimehr R., Kim B.W., Ekstrom L.B., Vanduffel W., Tootell R.B. The radial bias: A different slant on visual orientation sensitivity in human and nonhuman primates. Neuron 2006, 51(5):661-670.
50. Sawamura H., Orban G.A., Vogels R. Selectivity of neuronal adaptation does not match response selectivity: A single-cell study of the FMRI adaptation paradigm. Neuron 2006, 49(2):307-318.
51. Sewards T.V. Neural structures and mechanisms involved in scene recognition: A review and interpretation. Neuropsychologia 2010, 49(3):277-298.
52. Shelton A.L., Pippitt H.A. Fixed versus dynamic orientations in environmental learning from ground-level and aerial perspectives. Psychological Research 2007, 71(3):333-346.
53. Summerfield C., Trittschuh E.H., Monti J.M., Mesulam M.M., Egner T. Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations. Nature Neuroscience 2008.
54. Swisher J.D., Gatenby J.C., Gore J.C., Wolfe B.A., Moon C.H., Kim S.G., et al. Multiscale pattern analysis of orientation-selective activity in the primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30(1):325-330.
55. Takahashi N., Kawamura M., Shiota J., Kasahata N., Hirayama K. Pure topographic disorientation due to right retrosplenial lesion. Neurology 1997, 49(2):464-469.
56. Tanaka J.W., Taylor M. Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder. Cognitive Psychology 1991, 23(3):457-482.
57. Torralba A., Oliva A. Statistics of natural image categories. Network 2003, 14(3):391-412.
58. Tversky B., Hemenway K. Categories of environmental scenes. Cognitive Psychology 1983, 15:121-149.
59. Walther D.B., Caddigan E., Fei-Fei L., Beck D.M. Natural scene categories revealed in distributed patterns of activity in the human brain. Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29(34):10573-10581.
60. Weiner K.S., Sayres R., Vinberg J., Grill-Spector K. fMRI-adaptation and category selectivity in human ventral temporal cortex: Regional differences across time scales. Journal of Neurophysiology 2010, 103(6):3349-3365.
61. Williams M.A., Dang S., Kanwisher N.G. Only some spatial patterns of fMRI response are read out in task performance. Nature Neuroscience 2007, 10(6):685-686.