Radiation dose reduction for CT lung cancer screening using ASIR and MBIR: A phantom study

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 271-280

  Mathieu, Kelsey B ^a   Ai, Hua ^a   Fox, Patricia S ^a   Godoy, Myrna Cobos Barco ^a   Munden, Reginald F ^a   de Groot, Patricia M ^a   Pan, Tinsu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Ground glass opacity; Iterative reconstruction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84896338008     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15269914     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4515     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2011. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2011.
2. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(5):395-409.
3. Godoy MC and Naidich DP. Subsolid pulmonary nodules and the spectrum of peripheral adenocarcinomas of the lung: recommended interim guidelines for assessment and management. Radiology. 2009;253(3):606-22.
4. Network ACoRI. ACRIN/NLST CT technique comparison chart 2005. Available from: http://www.acrin.org/Portals/0/Protocols/6654/forms/qcforms/CT_Technique_Chart.pdf
5. Singh S, Kalra MK, Gilman MD, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study. Radiology. 2011;259(2):565-73.
6. Funama Y, Awai K, Nakayama Y, et al. Radiation dose reduction without degradation of low-contrast detectability at abdominal multisection CT with a low-tube voltage technique: phantom study. Radiology. 2005;237(3):905-10.
7. Dunnett CW. A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J Am Stat Assoc. 1955;50(272):1096-121.
8. Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat. 1979;6(2):65-70.
9. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Edu Psycholog Meas. 1960;20:37-46.
10. Landis JR and, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-74.
11. Wilson JM, Christianson OI, Richard S, Samei E. A methodology for image quality evaluation of advanced CT systems. Med Phys. 2013;40(3):031908.
12. Pachen JH, Yadava G, Debashish P, Hsieh J. Image quality evaluation of iterative CT reconstruction algorithms: a perspective from spatial domain noise texture measures. Medical Imaging 2012: Physics of Medical Imaging. Proceeding SPIE. 2012;8313:83132k.
13. Katsura M, Matsuda I, Akahane M, et al. Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for ultralow-dose chest ct: comparison of pulmonary nodule detectability with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol. 2013;48(4):206-12.
14. Neroladaki A, Botsikas D, Boudabbous S, Becker CD, Montet X. Computed tomography of the chest with model-based iterative reconstruction using a radiation exposure similar to chest X-ray examination: preliminary observations. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(2):360-66.
15. Yamada Y, Jinzaki M, Tanami Y, et al. Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for ultralow-dose computed tomography of the lung: a pilot study. Invest Radiol. 2012;47(8):482-89.
16. Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Mirtcheva R, McGuinness G, McCauley D, Miettinen OS. CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178(5):1053-57.