Midwifery students' evaluation of team-based academic assignments involving peer-marking

Women and Birth

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 58-63

  Parratt, Jenny A ^a   Fahy, Kathleen M ^a   Hastie, Carolyn R ^a  

^a SOUTHERN CROSS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Assessments; Education; Midwifery; Peer feedback; Students, undergraduate; Teamwork

Indexed keywords

ACTION RESEARCH; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMMUNICATION SKILL; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEDICAL STUDENT; MIDDLE AGED; MIDWIFE; PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSIBILITY; TEAMWORK;

ASSESSMENTS; EDUCATION; MIDWIFERY; PEER FEEDBACK; STUDENTS, UNDERGRADUATE; TEAMWORK;

ADULT; AUSTRALIA; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MIDWIFERY; PEER GROUP; PILOT PROJECTS; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; PROGRAM EVALUATION; STUDENTS, NURSING; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 84896318792     PISSN: 18715192     EISSN: 18781799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2013.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries Saving mothers' lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006-2008. The Eighth Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2011, 118(Suppl. 1):1-203.
2. King's Fund Safe births: everybody's business 2008, King's Fund, London.
3. Department of Health and Ageing Improving maternity services in Australia: the report of the maternity services review 2009, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
4. National Health and Medical Research Council National guidance on collaborative maternity care 2010, National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra.
5. Australian Nursing and Midwifery Council National competency standards for the midwife 2006, ANMC, Canberra, Available from:. http://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes-and-Guidelines.aspx.
6. International Confederation of Midwives Essential competencies for basic midwifery practice 2010 2011, ICM, The Hague, The Netherlands, Available from:. http://www.internationalmidwives.org/.
7. Tomcho T.J., Foels R. Meta-analysis of group learning activities: empirically based teaching recommendations. Teaching of Psychology 2012, 39(July (3)):159-169.
8. Macquarie dictionary 2005, Macquarie Library, Sydney. 4th ed. C. Yallop, J.R. Bernard, D. Blair, S. Butler, A. Delbridge, P. Peters (Eds.).
9. Johnson D.W., Johnson R.T., Smith K.A. Active learning cooperation in the college classroom 1991, Interaction Book Company, Edina, MN.
10. Hughes R.L., Jones S.K. Developing and assessing college student teamwork skills. New Directions for Institutional Research 2011, 2011(149):53-64.
11. Sweet M., Pelton-Sweet L.M. The social foundation of team-based learning: students accountable to students. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2008, 2008(116):29-40.
12. Sheard A.G., Kakabadse A.P. From loose groups to effective teams: the nine key factors of the team landscape. Journal of Management Development 2002, 21(2):133-151.
13. Raban R., Litchfield A. Supporting peer assessment of individual contributions in group work. Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education: who's learning? Whose technology? 2006, 685-694. Sydney University Press, Sydney. L. Markauskaite, P. Goodyear, P. Reimann (Eds.).
14. Gibbs G., Simpson C. Conditions under which assessment supports students' learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education 2004-05, (1):3-31.
15. Gielen S., Peeters E., Dochy F., Onghena P., Struyven K. Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction 2010, 20(4):304-315.
16. Hye-Jung L., Cheolil L. Peer evaluation in blended team project-based learning: what do students find important?. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 2012, 15(4):214-224.
17. Sergi M. Evaluating short-term and long-term peer assessment of student teamwork. e-Journal of Business Education and Scholarship Teaching 2007, 1(1):41-58.
18. Loughry M.L., Ohland M.W., Moore D.D. Development of a theory-based assessment of team member effectiveness. Educational and Psychological Measurement 2007, 67(3):505-524.
19. Madden E., Sinclair M., Wright M. Teamwork in obstetric emergencies. Evidence Based Midwifery 2011, 9(3):95-101.
20. Lathrop A., Winningham B., VandeVusse L. Simulation-based learning for midwives: background and pilot implementation. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 2007, 52(5):492-498.
21. Yang K., Woomer G.R., Matthews J.T. Collaborative learning among undergraduate students in community health nursing. Nurse Education in Practice 2012, 12(2):72-76.
22. Shiu A.T.Y., Chan C.W.H., Lam P., Lee J., Kwong A.N.L. Baccalaureate nursing students' perceptions of peer assessment of individual contributions to a group project: a case study. Nurse Education Today 2012, 32(3):214-218.
23. Wilson B.G. Constructivist learning environments: case studies in instructional design 1996, Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
24. Brown J.S., Collins A., Duguid P. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Situated learning perspectives 1996, 19-44. Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. H. McLellan (Ed.).
25. McLellan H. Situated learning perspectives 1996, Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
26. Lave J. Situated learning in communities of practice. Perspectives on socially shared cognition 1991, 63-82. American Psychological Association, Washington. L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine, S.D. Teasley (Eds.).
27. Stringer E.T. Action research in education 2008, Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall, Columbus, OH. 2nd ed.
28. Greenwood D.J., Levin M. Introduction to action research: social research for social change 2007, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. 2nd ed.
29. Reason P., Bradbury H. The SAGE handbook of action research 2008, SAGE Publications Ltd., London. 2nd ed.
30. Participatory Action Research in health care 2006, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. T. Koch, D. Kralik (Eds.).
31. Kemmis S., McTaggart R. Participatory Action Research: communicative action and the public sphere. The Sage handbook of qualitative research 2005, 559-603. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 3rd ed. N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.).
32. SurveyMonkey SurveyMonkey 2012, https://www.surveymonkey.com/.
33. Feingold C.E., Cobb M.D., Hernandez Givens R., Arnold J., Joslin S., Keller J.L. Student perceptions of team learning in nursing education. Journal of Nursing Education 2008, 47(5):214-222.