It's Not That We Don't Know, It's That We Don't Care: Explaining Why Selective Exposure Polarizes Attitudes

Mass Communication and Society

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 74-97

  Gvirsman, Shira Dvir ^a  

^a NETANYA ACADEMIC COLLEGE   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895908781     PISSN: 15205436     EISSN: 15327825     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15205436.2013.816738     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Bennett, W., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58, 703 - 731. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
2. Chaffee, S., & Miyo, Y. (1983). Selective exposure and the reinforcement hypothesis. Communication Research, 10, 3 - 36. doi: 10.1177/009365083010001001
3. Converse, P. E. (2007). Perspectives on mass belief systems and communication. In R. Dalton & H.-D. Klingemann (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political behavior (pp. 144-157). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
4. Dalton, R. (2000). Citizen attitudes and political behavior. Comparative Political Studies, 33, 912 - 940. doi: 10.1177/001041400003300609
5. Donsbach, W. (1991). Exposure to political content in newspapers: The impact of cognitive dissonance on readers' selectivity. European Journal of Communication, 6, 155 - 186.
6. Druckman, J. N., & Bolsen, T. (2011). Framing, motivated reasoning, and opinions about emergent technologies. Journal of Communication, 61, 659 - 688. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01562.x
7. Druckman, J. N., Fein, J., & Leeper, T. J. (2012). A source of bias in public opinion stability. American Journal of Political Science, 106, 420 - 445. doi: 10.1017/S0003055412000123
8. Feldman, L. (2011). The opinion factor: The effects of opinionated news on information processing and attitude change. Political Communication, 28. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2011.565014
9. Feldman, L., Maibach, E. W., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2011). Climate on cable: The nature and impact of global warming coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC. The International Journal of Press/Politics. doi: 10.1177/1940161211425410
10. Feldman, S., & Zaller, J. (1992). The political culture of ambivalence: Ideological responses to the welfare state. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 268 - 307.
11. Festinger, L. (1964). Conflict, decision, and dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12. Fischer, P., & Greitemeyer, T. (2010). A new look at selective-exposure effects: An integrative model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 384 - 389. doi: 10.1177/0963721410391246
13. Garrett, R. K. (2009). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 59, 676 - 699. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x
14. Gerber, A., & Green, D. (1999). Misperceptions about perceptual bias. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 189 - 210.
15. Goldman, S., & Mutz, D. (2011). The friendly media phenomenon: A cross-national analysis of cross-cutting exposure. Political Communication, 28, 42 - 66. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2010.544280
16. Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M., & Merrill, L. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 555 - 588. doi: 10.1037/a0015701
17. Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408 - 420. doi: 10.1080/03637750903310360
18. Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A computational tool for statistical moderation and mediation analysis. Manuscript in preparation. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
19. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
20. Holbert, R., Garrett, R. K., & Gleason, L. (2010). A new era of minimal effects? A response to Bennett and Iyengar. Journal of Communication, 60, 15 - 34. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01470.x
21. Holbert, R., Hmielowski, J. D., & Weeks, B. E. (2012). Clarifying relationships between ideology and ideologically oriented cable TV news use: A case of suppression. Communication Research, 39, 194 - 216. doi: 10.1177/0093650211405650
22. Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M., & Osborn, T. (2004). Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Political Psychology, 25, 65 - 95. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00357.x
23. Hwang, H., Gotlieb, M. R., Nah, S., & Mcleod, D. (2007). Applying a cognitive-processing model to presidential febate effects: Post debate news analysis and primed reflection. Journal of Communication, 57, 40-59. doi: 10.1111/jcom.2007.57.issue-1
24. Hwang, H., Schmierbach, M., Paek, H.-J., Gil de Zuniga, H., & Shah, D. (2006). Media dissociation, Internet use, and antiwar political participation: A case study of political dissent and action against the war in Iraq. Mass Communication and Society, 9, 461 - 483. doi: 10.1207/s15327825mcs0904_5
25. Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59, 19 - 39. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
26. Jacoby, W. (1995). The structure of ideological thinking in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 314 - 335.
27. Jamieson, K. H., & Cappella, J. (2008). Echo chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the conservative media establishment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28. Janis, I., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York, NY: Free Press.
29. Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Prospect on Psychology Science, 3, 126 - 136. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00070.x
30. Kaarbo, J., & Beasley, R. K. (1999). A practical guide to the comparative case study method in political psychology. Political Psychology, 20, 369 - 391. doi: 10.1111/0162-895x.00149
31. Kiousis, S. (2005). Compelling arguments and attitude strength: Exploring the impact of second-level agenda setting on public opinion of presidential candidate images. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10, 3 - 27. doi: 10.1177/1081180x05276095
32. Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Hastall, M. R. (2010). Please your self: Social identity effects on selective exposure to news about in- and out-groups. Journal of Communication, 60, 515 - 535. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01495.x
33. Korn, A. (2004). Reporting Palestinian casualties in the Israeli press: The case of Haaretz and the Intifada. Journalism Studies, 5, 247 - 262. doi: 10.1080/1461670042000211212
34. Lang, A. (2011, May). The shifting paradigm of mass communication research. Paper presented at the ICA, Boston, MA.
35. Lavine, H., Borgida, E., & Sullivan, J. (2000). On the relationship between attitude involvement and attitude accessibility: Toward a cognitive-motivational model of political information processing. Political Psychology, 21, 81 - 106. doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00178
36. Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1948). The people's choice; how the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign (), 2nd ed. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
37. Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098 - 2109.
38. Mutz, D. C. (2006). How the mass media divide us. In P. S. Nivola & D. W. Brady (Eds.), Red and blue nation? Characteristics and causes of America's polarized politics (Vol. 1, pp. 223 - 263). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
39. Nir, L. (2005). Ambivalent social networks and their consequences for participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17, 422 - 442. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edh069
40. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185 - 227. doi: 10.1080/00273170701341316
41. Schwartz, S. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19 - 45. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x
42. Sears, D. O., & Freedman, J. L. (1967). Selective exposure to information: A critical review. Public Opinion Quarterly, 31, 194-210.
43. Shapiro, M. A. (2002). Generalizability in communication research. Human Communication Research, 28, 491 - 500. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00819.x
44. Slater, M. D. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17, 281 - 303. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x
45. Soffer, O. (2011). Mass communication in Israel [in Hebrew]. Raanana: The Open University of Israel.
46. Sotirovic, M., & McLeod, J. (2001). Values, communication behavior, and political participation. Political Communication, 18, 273 - 300. doi: 10.1080/10584600152400347
47. Stroud, N. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30, 341 - 366. doi: 10.1007/s11109-007-9050-9
48. Stroud, N. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60, 536 - 576. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x
49. Taber, C., Cann, D., & Kucsova, S. (2009). The motivated processing of political arguments. Political Behavior, 31, 137 - 155. doi: 10.1007/s11109-008-9075-8
50. Taber, C., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 755 - 769. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
51. Tesser, A., Martin, L., & Marilyn, M. (1995). The impact of thought on attitude extremity and attitude-behavior consistency. In R. E. Petty & J. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (Vol. 4, pp. 73 - 92). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Tesser, A., & Shaffer, D. R. (1990). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 497 - 523. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002403
53. Tsfati, Y., Stroud, N. J., & Chotiner, A. (Forthcoming). Exposure to ideological news and perceived opinion climate: Testing the media effects component of spiral-of-silence in a fragmented media landscape. International Journal of Press/Politics.
54. Tsfati, Y., & Peri, Y. (2006). Mainstream media skepticism and exposure to sectorial and extranational news media: The case of Israel. Mass Communication and Society, 9, 165 - 187. doi: 0.1207/s15327825mcs0902_3
55. Warner, B. R. (2010). Segmenting the electorate: The effects of exposure to political extremism online. Communication Studies, 61, 430 - 444. doi: 10.1080/10510974.2010.497069
56. Wojcieszak, M. (2010). Don't talk to me: Effects of ideologically homogeneous online groups and politically dissimilar offline ties on extremism. New Media & Society, 12, 637 - 655. doi: 10.1177/1461444809342775
57. Wojcieszak, M., & Rojas, H. (2011). Correlates of party, ideology and issue based extremity in an era of egocentric publics. The International Journal of Press/Politics. doi: 10.1177/1940161211418226