Cell-autonomous correction of ring chromosomes in human induced pluripotent stem cells

Nature

Volumn 507, Issue 7490, 2014, Pages 99-103

  Bershteyn, Marina ^a,b   Hayashi, Yohei ^c,d   Desachy, Guillaume ^b   Hsiao, Edward C ^b   Sami, Salma ^c,d   Tsang, Kathryn M ^b   Weiss, Lauren A ^b   Kriegstein, Arnold R ^b   Yamanaka, Shinya ^a,c,d,e   Wynshaw Boris, Anthony ^a,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c GLADSTONE INSTITUTE OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE   (United States)

^d Roddenberry Center for Stem Cell Biology and Medicine at Gladstone   (United States)

^e KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^f CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL ORGANELLE; CHROMOSOME; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; DISEASE SEVERITY; GENE EXPRESSION; HOMOLOGY; NUMERICAL MODEL;

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; CELL POPULATION; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CHROMOSOME NUMBER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FIBROBLAST; GENE DELETION; GENE LOCUS; HETEROZYGOSITY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; KARYOTYPE; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RING CHROMOSOME; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; UNIPARENTAL DISOMY;

ANEUPLOIDY; ANIMALS; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; CHROMOSOME DELETION; CHROMOSOME DISORDERS; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, PAIR 13; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, PAIR 17; CLONE CELLS; FIBROBLASTS; HUMANS; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; KARYOTYPE; KARYOTYPING; MALE; MICE; MODELS, GENETIC; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; RING CHROMOSOMES; UNIPARENTAL DISOMY;

EID: 84895890748     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature12923     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Cote, G. B. et al. The cytogenetic and clinical implications of a ring chromosome 2. Ann. Genet. 24, 231-235 (1981).
2. Kosztolányi, G. Does "ring syndrome" exist? An analysis of 207 case reports on patients with a ring autosome. Hum. Genet. 75, 174-179 (1987).
3. McClintock, B. The production of homozygous deficient tissues with mutant characteristics by means of the aberrant mitotic behavior of ring-shaped chromosomes. Genetics 23, 315-376 (1938).
4. Kistenmacher, M. L. & Punnett, H. H. Comparative behavior of ring chromosomes. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 22, 304-318 (1970).
5. Tommerup, N. & Lothe, R. Constitutional ring chromosomes and tumor suppressor genes. J. Med. Genetik 29, 879-882 (1992).
6. Jobanputra, V. et al. Changes in an inherited ring (22) due to meiotic recombination? Implications for genetic counseling. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 149A, 1310-1314 (2009).
7. Mantzouratau, A. et al. Meiotic and mitotic behaviour of a ring/deleted chromosome 22 in human embryos determined by preimplantation genetic diagnosis for a maternal carrier. Mol. Cytogenet. 2, 3 (2009).
8. Sodré, C. P. et al. Ring chromosome instability evaluation in six patients with autosomal rings. Genet. Mol. Res. 9, 134-143 (2010).
9. Zhang, H. Z. et al. Unique genomic structure and distinct mitotic behavior of ring chromosome 21 in two unrelated cases. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 136, 180-187 (2012).
10. Takahashi, K. et al. Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors. Cell 131, 861-872 (2007).
11. Yu, J. et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science 318, 1917-1920 (2007).
12. Park, I. H. et al. Reprogramming of human somatic cells to pluripotency with defined factors. Nature 451, 141-146 (2008).
13. Jiang, J. et al. Translating dosage compensation to trisomy 21. Nature 500, 296-300 (2013).
14. Dobyns, W. B. et al. Miller-Dieker syndrome: lissencephaly and monosomy 17p. J. Pediatr. 102, 552-558 (1983).
15. Cardoso, C. et al. Refinement of a 400-kb critical region allows genotypic differentiation between isolated lissencephaly, Miller-Dieker syndrome, and other phenotypes secondary to deletions of 17p13.3. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 72, 918-930 (2003).
16. Wynshaw-Boris, A. et al. Lissencephaly: mechanistic insights from animal models and potential therapeutic strategies. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 21, 823-830 (2010).
17. Okita, K. et al. A more efficient method to generate integration-free human iPS cells. Nature Methods 8, 409-412 (2011).
18. Robinson, W. P. Mechanisms leading to uniparental disomy and their clinical consequences. Bioessays 22, 452-459 (2000).
19. Speevak, M. D. et al. Molecular characterization of an inherited ring (19) demonstrating ring opening. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 121A, 141-145 (2003).
20. Hussein, S. M. et al. Genome damage in induced pluripotent stem cells: assessing the mechanisms and their consequences. Bioessays 35, 152-162 (2013).
21. Moynahan, M. E. & Jasin, M. Mitotic homologous recombination maintains genomic stability and suppresses tumorigenesis. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 196-207 (2010).
22. Draper, J. S. et al. Recurrent gain of chromosomes17q and 12 in cultured human embryonic stem cells. Nature Biotechnol. 22, 53-54 (2004).
23. Baker, D. E. et al. Adaptation to culture of human embryonic stem cells and oncogenesis in vivo. Nature Biotechnol. 25, 207-215 (2007).
24. Spits, C. et al. Recurrent chromosomal abnormalities in human embryonic stem cells. Nature Biotechnol. 26, 1361-1363 (2008).
25. Azuhata, T. et al. The inhibitor of apoptosis protein survivin is associated with high-risk behavior of neuroblastoma. J. Pediatr. Surg. 36, 1785-1791 (2001).
26. Damelin, M. et al.Decatenation checkpoint deficiency in stemand progenitor cells. Cancer Cell 8, 479-484 (2005).
27. Wilton, L. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in early human embryos: a review. Prenat. Diagn. 22, 512-518 (2002).
28. Vanneste, E. et al. Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos. Nature Med. 15, 577-583 (2009).
29. Petersen, M. B. et al. Uniparental isodisomy due to duplication of chromosome 21 occurring in somatic cells monosomic for chromosome 21. Genomics 13, 269-274 (1992).
30. Bartsch, O. et al. "Compensatory" uniparental disomy of chromosome 21 in two cases. J. Med. Genet. 31, 534-540 (1994).
31. Matsumoto, Y. et al. Induced pluripotent stem cells from patients with human fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva show increased mineralization and cartilage formation. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 8, 190-204 (2013).
32. Pfaffl, M. W. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, e45 (2001).
33. Hoffmann, T. J. et al. Next generation genome-wide association tool: design and coverage of a high-throughput European-optimized SNP array. Genomics 98, 79-89 (2011).
34. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. http://www. R-project.org. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2008).
35. Bolstad, B. M. et al. A comparison of Normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics 19, 185-193 (2003).
36. Weiss, L. A. et al. Association between microdeletion and microduplication at 16p11.2 and autism. N. Engl. J. Med. 358, 667-675 (2008).
37. Colella, S. et al. QuantiSNP: an objective Bayes hidden-Markov model to detect and accurately map copy number variation using SNP genotyping data. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 2013-2025 (2007).
38. Meisner, L. F. & Johnson, J. A. Protocols for cytogenetic studies of human embryonic stem cells. Methods 45, 133-141 (2008).