Combining FISH and model-based predictions to understand chromosome evolution in Typhonium (Araceae)

Annals of Botany

Volumn 113, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 669-680

  Sousa, Aretuza ^a   Cusimano, Natalie ^a   Renner, Susanne S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

45S rDNA; 5S rDNA; Ancestral trait reconstruction; aneuploid chromosome numbers; Araceae; Bayesian inference; chromosome evolution; FISH; maximum likelihood inference; telomeres; Typhonium

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME; DATA SET; GENETIC MARKER; HYBRIDIZATION; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MONOCOTYLEDON; NUMERICAL MODEL; PHYLOGENY; PLASTID; PREDICTION;

DNA 5S; PLANT DNA; RIBOSOME DNA;

45S RDNA; ANCESTRAL TRAIT RECONSTRUCTION; ANEUPLOID CHROMOSOME NUMBERS; ANEUPLOIDY; ARACEAE; ARTICLE; BAYESIAN INFERENCE; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CHROMOSOME EVOLUTION; CYTOLOGY; FISH; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD INFERENCE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PLANT CHROMOSOME; PLASTID; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL; TELOMERE; TELOMERES; TYPHONIUM;

45S RDNA; 5S RDNA; ANCESTRAL TRAIT RECONSTRUCTION; ANEUPLOID CHROMOSOME NUMBERS; ARACEAE; BAYESIAN INFERENCE; CHROMOSOME EVOLUTION; FISH; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD INFERENCE; TELOMERES; TYPHONIUM;

ANEUPLOIDY; ARACEAE; BASE SEQUENCE; CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; CYTOGENETIC ANALYSIS; DNA, PLANT; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC MARKERS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; PHYLOGENY; PLASTIDS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TELOMERE;

EID: 84895798027     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mct302     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Adams SP, Leitch IJ, Bennett MD, Chase MW, Leitch AR. 2000. Ribosomal DNA evolution and phylogeny inAloe (Asphodelaceae). American Journal of Botany 87: 1578-1583.
2. Ansari HA, Ellison NW, Williams WM. 2008. Molecular and cytogenetic evidence for an allotetraploid origin of Trifolium dubium (Leguminosae). Chromosoma 117: 159-167.
3. Biessmann H, Mason JM. 1992. Genetics and molecular biology of telomeres. Advances in Genetics 30: 185-249.
4. Boyce PB, Croat TB. 2013. The Uberlist of Araceae. Totals for published and estimated numbers of species in aroid genera (http://www.aroid.org/genera/ 130307uberlist.pdf).
5. Castresana J. 2000. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17: 540-552.
6. Cusimano N, Renner SS. 2014. Further on the effects of branch lengths on ancestral state reconstruction. Systematic Biology (in press).
7. Cusimano N, Barrett M, Hetterscheid WLA, Renner SS. 2010. A phylogeny of the Areae (Araceae) implies that Typhonium, Sauromatum and the Australian species of Typhonium are distinct clades. Taxon 59: 439-447.
8. Cusimano N, Bogner J, Mayo SJ, et al. 2011. Relationships within the Araceae: comparisons of morphological patterns with molecular phylogenies. American Journal of Botany 98: 654-668.
9. Cusimano N, Sousa A, Renner SS. 2012a. Maximum likelihood inference implies a high, not a low, ancestral haploid chromosome number in the Araceae, with a critique of the bias introduced by 'x'. Annals of Botany 109: 681-692.
10. Cusimano N, Stadler T, Renner SS. 2012b. Anew method for handling missing species in diversification analysis applicable to randomly or non-randomly sampled phylogenies. Systematic Biology 61: 785-792.
11. Da Silva CRM, González-Elizondo MS, Vanzela ALL. 2005. Reduction of chromosome number in Eleocharis subarticulata (Cyperaceae) by multiple translocations. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 149: 457-464.
12. DeMelo NF, Guerra M. 2003. Variability of 5S and 45 SrDNA sites in Passiflora L. species with distinct base chromosome numbers. Annals of Botany 92: 309-316.
13. Dhar MK, Friebe B, Koul AK, Gill BS. 2002. Origin of an apparent B chromosome by mutation, chromosome fragmentation and specific DNA sequence amplification. Chromosoma 111: 332-340.
14. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. 2007. Bayesian evolution a ryanalysisbysampling trees. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: 214.
15. Fuchs J, Brandes A, Schubert I. 1995. Telomere sequence localization and kar-yotype evolution in higher plants. Plant Systematics and Evolution 196: 227-241.
16. Hetterscheid WLA. 2013. New Typhonium species from Asia. Aroideana 36: 93-97.
17. Hetterscheid WLA, Boyce PC. 2000. A reclassification of Sauromatum Schott and new species of Typhonium Schott (Araceae). Aroideana 23: 48-55.
18. Hetterscheid WLA, Galloway A. 2006. New Typhonium (Araceae) speciesfrom Thailand. Aroideana 29: 80-85.
19. Hetterscheid WLA, Nguyen VD. 2001. Three new species of Typhonium (Araceae) from Vietnam. Aroideana 24: 24-29.
20. Hetterscheid WLA, Sookchaloem D, Murata J. 2001. Typhonium (Araceae) of Thailand: new species and a revised key. Aroideana 24: 30-55.
21. Ijdo JW, Wells RA, Baldini A, Reeders ST. 1991. Improved telomere detection using a telomere repeat probe (TTAGGG) n generated by PCR. Nucleic Acids Research 19: 17.
22. Kovarik A, Pires JC, Leitch AR, et al. 2005. Rapid concerted evolution of nuclear ribosomal DNAin two Tragopogon allopolyploidsof recent and recurrent origin. Genetics 169: 931-944.
23. Larsen K. 1969. Cytology of vascular plants: III. A study of Aroids. Dansk Botanisk Arkiv 27: 39-59.
24. Marchant CJ. 1973. Chromosome variation in Araceae IV: from Acoreae to Lasieae. Kew Bulletin 28: 199-210.
25. Marschner S, Meister A, Blattner FR, Houben A. 2007. Evolution and func-tionofBchromosome45S rDNA sequencesin Brachycomedi chromosomatica. Genome 50: 638-644.
26. Mayrose I, Barker MS, Otto SP. 2010. Probabilistic models of chromosome number evolution and the inference of polyploidy. Systematic Biology 59: 132-144.
27. Nauheimer L, Boyce PC, Renner SS. 2012. Giant taro and its relatives: a phyl-ogenyofthe large genus Alocasia (Araceae) sheds lightonMiocenefloristic exchange in the Malesian region. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 63: 43-51.
28. Petersen G. 1993. Chromosome numbers of the genera of Araceae. Aroideana 16: 37-46.
29. Ramachandran K. 1978. Cytological studies on South Indian Araceae. Cytologia 43: 289-303.
30. Raskina O, Barber JC, Nevo E, Belyayev A. 2008. Repetitive DNA and chromosomal rearrangements: speciation-related events in plant genomes. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 120: 351-357.
31. Schmidt T, Schwarzacher T, Heslop-Harrison JS. 1994. Physical mapping of rRNAgenes byfluorescentinsitu hybridization and structural analysisof5S rRNA genes and intergenic spacer sequences in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 88: 629-636.
32. Schmidt A, Doudrick RL, Heslop-Harrison JS, Schmidt T. 2000. The contri-butionofshortrepeatsoflowsequencecomplexitytolargeconifergenomes. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101: 7-14.
33. Schubert I. 1992. Telomeric polymorphism in Vicia faba. Biologisches Zentralblatt 111: 164-168.
34. Schubert I. 2007. Chromosome evolution. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 10: 109-115.
35. Schubert I, Lysak MA. 2011. Interpretation of karyotype evolution should consider chromosome structural constraints. Trends in Genetics 27: 207-216.
36. Schubert I, Wobus U. 1985. In situ hybridization confirms jumping nucleolus organizing regions in Allium. Chromosoma 92: 143-148.
37. Schubert I, Rieger R, Fuchs J. 1995. Alteration of basic chromosome numberby fusion-fission cycles. Genome 38: 1289-1292.
38. Slijepcevic P. 1998. Telomeres and mechanisms of Robertsonian fusion. Chromosoma 107: 136-140.
39. Sousa A, Fuchs J, Renner SS. 2013. Molecular cytogenetics (FISH, GISH) of Coccinia grandis: a ca. 3 myr-old species of Cucurbitaceae with the largest Y/autosome divergence in flowering plants. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 139: 107-118.
40. Souza LGR, Crosa O, Guerra M. 2010. Karyological circumscription of Ipheion Rafinesque (Giliesioideae, Alliaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 287: 119-127.
41. Souza LGR, Crosa O, Winge H, Guerra M. 2009. The karyotype of Nothoscordum arenarium Herter (Gilliesioideae, Alliaceae): a popula-tional and cytomolecular analysis. Genetics and Molecular Biology 32: 111-116.
42. Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogen-etic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688-2690.
43. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. 2008. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web-servers. Systematic Biology 57: 758-771.
44. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28: 2731-2739.
45. Weiss-Schneeweiss H, Tremetsberger K, Schneeweiss GM, Parker JS, Stuessy TF. 2008. Karyotype diversification and evolution in diploid and polyploid South American Hypochaeris (Asteraceae) inferred from rDNA localization and genetic fingerprint data. Annals of Botany 101: 909-918.
46. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. New York: Academic Press, 315-322.
47. Zhin-Ling D, Shao-Tian C, Yun-Heng J, Heng L. 2007. Typhonium baosha-nense Z. L. Dao & H. Li, a new species of Araceae from western Yunnan, China. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 45: 234-238.
48. Zhonglang WHL, Fuhua B. 2002. Typhonium jinpingense, a new species from Yunnan, China, with the lowest diploid chromosome number in Araceae. Novon 12: 286-289.