Bipolar and schizophrenia network for intermediate phenotypes: Outcomes across the psychosis continuum

Schizophrenia Bulletin

Volumn 40, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2014, Pages

  Tamminga, Carol A ^a   Pearlson, Godfrey ^b   Keshavan, Matcheri ^c   Sweeney, John ^d   Clementz, Brett ^e   Thaker, Gunvant ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b HARTFORD HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e Department of Psychology University of Georgia ^*  (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

biomarkers; diagnoses; phenotypes; psychosis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIPOLAR DISORDER; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED RESPONSE; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHIZOPHRENIA; BRAIN; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; FACTUAL DATABASE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOTIC DISORDERS;

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

BIOMARKERS; BIPOLAR DISORDER; BRAIN; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HUMANS; PHENOTYPE; PSYCHOTIC DISORDERS; SCHIZOPHRENIA;

EID: 84895733925     PISSN: 05867614     EISSN: 17451701     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbt179     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Kraepelin E. Dementia Praecox and Paraphrenia. Edinburgh, Scotland: E. and S. Livingston; 1919.
2. Bleuler E. Dementia Praecox or the Group of Schizophrenias. New York, NY: International Universities Press; 1950.
3. Greer PL, Greenberg ME. From synapse to nucleus: calciumdependent gene transcription in the control of synapse development and function. Neuron. 2008;59:846-860.
4. Charney DS, Buxbaum J, Sklar P, Nestler EJ. Neurobiology of Mental Illness, 4th ed. 2013.
5. Smoller JW, Craddock N, Kendler K et al. Identification of risk loci with shared effects on five major psychiatric disorders: a genome-wide analysis. Lancet 2013; 381(9875):1371-1379.
6. Ripke S, O'Dushlaine C, Chambert K et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies 13 new risk loci for schizophrenia. Nat Genet. 2013; 45(10):1150-1159.
7. Solovieff N, Cotsapas C, Lee PH, Purcell SM, Smoller JW. Pleiotropy in complex traits: challenges and strategies. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14:483-495.
8. Cuthbert BN, Insel TR. Toward new approaches to psychotic disorders: the NIMH Research Domain Criteria project. Schizophr Bull. 2010;36:1061-1062.
9. Braff DL, Freedman R, Schork NJ, Gottesman II. Deconstructing schizophrenia: an overview of the use of endophenotypes in order to understand a complex disorder. Schizophr Bull. 2007;33:21-32.
10. Greenwood TA, Swerdlow NR, Gur RE, et al. Genome-wide linkage analyses of 12 endophenotypes for schizophrenia from the Consortium on the Genetics of Schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2013;170:521-532.
11. Keshavan MS, Morris DW, Sweeney JA, et al. A dimensional approach to the psychosis spectrum between bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: the Schizo-Bipolar Scale. Schizophr Res. 2011;133:250-254.
12. Keshavan MS, Clementz BA, Pearlson GD, Sweeney JA, Tamminga CA. Reimagining psychoses: an agnostic approach to diagnosis. Schizophr Res. 2013;146:10-16.
13. Tamminga CA, Ivleva EI, Keshavan MS, et al. Clinical phenotypes of psychosis in the bipolar and schizophrenia network on intermediate phenotypes (BSNIP). Am J Psychiatry. 2013;170:1263-1274.
14. Hill SK, Reilly JL, Keefe RS et al. Neuropsychological Impairments in Schizophrenia and Psychotic Bipolar Disorder: Findings from the Bipolar and Schizophrenia Network on Intermediate Phenotypes (B-SNIP) Study. Am J Psychiatry. 2013. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12101298.
15. Hamm JP, Ethridge LE, Shapiro JR, et al. Spatiotemporal and frequency domain analysis of auditory paired stimuli processing in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder with psychosis. Psychophysiology 2012;49:522-530.
16. Reilly JL, Frankovich K., Hill S. et al. Elevated antisaccade error rate as an intermediate phenotype for psychosis across diagnostic categories. 2013.
17. Ethridge LE, Hamm JP, Shapiro JR, et al. Neural activations during auditory oddball processing discriminating schizophrenia and psychotic bipolar disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2012;72:766-774.
18. Meda SA, Gill A, Stevens MC, et al. Differences in restingstate functional magnetic resonance imaging functional network connectivity between schizophrenia and psychotic bipolar probands and their unaffected first-degree relatives. Biol Psychiatry. 2012;71:881-889.
19. Khadka S, Meda SA, Stevens MC, et al. Is aberrant functional connectivity a psychosis endophenotype? a resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Biol Psychiatry. 2013. doi:pii: S0006-3223(13)00403-4. 10.1016/j. biopsych.2013.04.024.
20. Unschuld PG, Buchholz AS, Varvaris M, et al. Prefrontal Brain Network Connectivity Indicates Degree of Both Schizophrenia Risk and Cognitive Dysfunction. Schizophr Bull. 2013.
21. Ivleva EI, Bidesi AS, Keshavan MS, et al. Gray Matter Volume as an Intermediate Phenotype for Psychosis: Bipolar-Schizophrenia Network on Intermediate Phenotypes (B-SNIP). Am J Psychiatry. 2013;170:1285-1296.
22. Skudlarski P, Schretlen DJ, Thaker GK, et al. Diffusion Tensor Imaging White Matter Endophenotypes in Patients with Schizophrenia or Psychotic Bipolar Disorder and Their Relatives. Am J Psychiatry. 2013;170:886-898.
23. Ivleva EI, Bidesi A, Thomas BP et al. Brain gray matter phenotypes across the psychosis dimension. Psychiatry Res. 2012; 204(1):13-24.
24. Meda SA, Narayanan B, Liu J, et al. A Large Scale Multivariate Parallel ICA Method Reveals Novel Imaging- Genetic Relationships for Alzheimer's Disease in the ADNI Cohort. Neuroimage. 2012;60:1608-1621.