Toward new approaches to psychotic disorders: The NIMH research domain criteria project

Schizophrenia Bulletin

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1061-1062

  Cuthbert, Bruce N ^a   Insel, Thomas R ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIPOLAR DISORDER; DIABETES MELLITUS; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; EDITORIAL; EPILEPSY; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; HYPERTENSION; MAJOR DEPRESSION; MANIC DEPRESSIVE PSYCHOSIS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOSIS; SCHIZOAFFECTIVE PSYCHOSIS; SCHIZOPHRENIA; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; WORKING MEMORY;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; BRAIN; CHILD; COMORBIDITY; HUMANS; NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH (U.S.); NERVE NET; PSYCHOTIC DISORDERS; RISK FACTORS; SCHIZOPHRENIA; SCHIZOPHRENIC PSYCHOLOGY; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 78650158555     PISSN: 05867614     EISSN: 17451701     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbq108     Document Type: Editorial

References (10)

1. International Schizophrenia Consortium. Common polygenicvariation contributes to risk of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Nature. 2009;460:748-752.
2. Cook EH, Jr, Scherer SW. Copy-number variations associatedwith neuropsychiatric conditions. Nature. 2008;455:919-923.
3. Brandon NJ, Millar JK, Korth C, Sive H, Singh KK, Sawa A.Understanding the role of DISC1 in psychiatric disease anddevelopment. J Neurosci. 2009;29:12768-12775.
4. Craddock N, Owen MJ. The Kraepelinian dichotomy-going, going. but still not gone. Br J Psychiatry. 2010;196:92-95.
5. Fischer BA, Carpenter WT, Jr. Will the Kraepelinian dichotomysurvive DSM-V? Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009;34:2081-2087.
6. Ovsiew F. An end to Kraepelinian nosology? J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2000;12:297-299.
7. Craddock N, O'Donovan MC, Owen MJ. Psychosis genetics:modeling the relationship between schizophrenia, bipolar disorder,and mixed (or "schizoaffective") psychoses. SchizophrBull. 2009;35:482-490.
8. Kendell RE. The major functional psychoses: are they independententities or part of a continuum? Philosophical andconceptual issues underlying the debate. In: Kerr A,McClelland H, eds. Concepts of Mental Disorder: A ContinuingDebate. London, UK: Gaskell; 1991:1-16.
9. National Institute of Mental Health. The National Institute of Mental Health Strategic Plan. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Mental Health (NIH Publication 08-6368). 2008. http://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/strategic-planning- reports/index.shtml.
10. Carter CS, Barch DM. Cognitive neuroscience-basedapproaches to measuring and improving treatment effects oncognition in schizophrenia: the CNTRICS initiative. SchizophrBull. 2007;33:1131-1137.