Impact of mentoring medical students on scholarly productivity

International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 138-142

  Svider, Peter F ^a   Husain, Qasim ^b   Mauro, Kevin M ^b   Folbe, Adam J ^a   Baredes, Soly ^b   Eloy, Jean Anderson ^b,c  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b RUTGERS NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c RWJ Barnabas Health   (United States)

Author keywords

Graduate student research; Medical student research; Mentorship; Otolaryngology authorship; Research productivity; Scholarly impact; Scholarly productivity

Indexed keywords

GRADUATE STUDENT RESEARCH; MEDICAL STUDENT RESEARCH; MENTORSHIP; OTOLARYNGOLOGY AUTHORSHIP; RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY; SCHOLARLY IMPACT; SCHOLARLY PRODUCTIVITY;

EFFICIENCY; HUMANS; MENTORS; OTOLARYNGOLOGY; RESEARCH; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 84895070418     PISSN: 20426976     EISSN: 20426984     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/alr.21247     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Atasoylu AA, Wright SM, Beasley BW, et al. Promotion criteria for clinician-educators. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:711-716.
2. Bligh J, Brice J. Further insights into the roles of the medical educator: the importance of scholarly management. Acad Med. 2009;84:1161-1165.
3. Toledo-Pereyra LH. Fostering scholarly activities and encouraging publications. J Invest Surg. 2012;25:65-66.
4. Carr PL, Pololi L, Knight S, Conrad P. Collaboration in academic medicine: reflections on gender and advancement. Acad Med. 2009;84:1447-1453.
5. Karani R, Ognibene FP, Fallar R, Gliatto P. Medical students' experiences with authorship in biomedical research: a national survey. Acad Med. 2013;88:364-368.
6. Nikkar-Esfahani A, Jamjoom AA, Fitzgerald JE. Extracurricular participation in research and audit by medical students: opportunities, obstacles, motivation and outcomes. Med Teach. 2012;34:e317-e324.
7. National Resident Matching Program and Association of American Medical Colleges. Charting outcomes in the match. Specialties Matching Service®, appointment year 2011. Characteristics of applicants who matched to their preferred specialty. 1st edition. Washington, DC: National Resident Matching Program; May 2013. http://b83c73bcf0e7ca356c80-e8560f466940e4ec38ed51af32994bc6.r6.cf1.rackcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/NRMP-Charting-Outcomes-in-the-Match-Specialties-Matching-Service-1st-Edition-Published-May-2013.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2013.
8. Benway BM, Kalidas P, Cabello JM, Bhayani SB. Does citation analysis reveal association between h-index and academic rank in urology? Urology. 2009;74:30-33.
9. Pagel PS, Hudetz JA. H-index is a sensitive indicator of academic activity in highly productive anaesthesiologists: results of a bibliometric analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011;55:1085-1089.
10. Pagel PS, Hudetz JA. Bibliometric analysis of anaesthesia journal editorial board members: correlation between journal impact factor and the median h-index of its board members. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107:357-361.
11. Pagel PS, Hudetz JA. Scholarly productivity of united states academic cardiothoracic anesthesiologists: influence of fellowship accreditation and transesophageal echocardiographic credentials on h-index and other citation bibliometrics. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011;25:761-765.
12. Quigley MR, Holliday EB, Fuller CD, Choi M, Thomas CR Jr. Distribution of the h-index in radiation oncology conforms to a variation of power law: implications for assessing academic productivity. J Cancer Educ. 2012;27:463-466.
13. Rad AE, Brinjikji W, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF. The h-index in academic radiology. Acad Radiol. 2010;17:817-821.
14. Rezek I, McDonald RJ, Kallmes DF. Is the h-index predictive of greater NIH funding success among academic radiologists? Acad Radiol. 2011;18:1337-1340.
15. Svider PF, Choudhry ZA, Choudhry OJ, Baredes S, Liu JK, Eloy JA. The use of the h-index in academic otolaryngology. Laryngoscope. 2013;123:103-106.
16. Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:16569-16572.
17. Lee J, Kraus KL, Couldwell WT. Use of the h index in neurosurgery. Clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2009;111:387-392.
18. Poynard T, Thabut D, Jabre P, et al. Ranking hepatologists: which Hirsch's h-index to prevent the "e-crise de foi-e"? Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2011;35:375-386.
19. Hunt GE, Cleary M, Walter G. Psychiatry and the Hirsch h-index: The relationship between journal impact factors and accrued citations. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2010;18:207-219.
20. Pagel PS, Hudetz JA. An analysis of scholarly productivity in United States academic anaesthesiologists by citation bibliometrics. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:873-878.
21. Colaco M, Svider PF, Mauro KM, Eloy JA, Jackson-Rosario I. Is there a relationship between National Institutes of Health funding and research impact on academic urology? J Urol. 2013;190:999-1003.
22. Eloy JA, Svider P, Chandrasekhar SS, et al. Gender disparities in scholarly productivity within academic otolaryngology departments. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;148:215-222.
23. Eloy JA, Svider PF, Cherla DV, et al. Gender disparities in research productivity among 9952 academic physicians. Laryngoscope. 2013;123:1865-1875.
24. Eloy JA, Svider PF, Kovalerchik O, Baredes S, Kalyoussef E, Chandrasekhar SS. Gender differences in successful NIH grant funding in otolaryngology. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;149:77-83.
25. Eloy JA, Svider PF, Mauro KM, Setzen M, Baredes S. Impact of fellowship training on research productivity in academic otolaryngology. Laryngoscope. 2012;122:2690-2694.
26. Svider PF, Mauro KM, Sanghvi S, Setzen M, Baredes S, Eloy JA. Is NIH funding predictive of greater research productivity and impact among academic otolaryngologists? Laryngoscope. 2013;123:118-122.
27. Svider PF, Pashkova AA, Choudhry Z, et al. Comparison of scholarly impact among surgical specialties: an examination of 2429 academic surgeons. Laryngoscope. 2013;123:884-889.
28. Pashkova AA, Svider PF, Chang CY, Diaz L, Eloy JA, Eloy JD. Gender disparity among US anaesthesiologists: are women underrepresented in academic ranks and scholarly productivity? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013;57:1058-1064.
29. Svider PF, Mady LJ, Husain Q, et al. Geographic differences in academic promotion practices, fellowship training, and scholarly impact. Am J Otolarygol. 2013;34:464-470.
30. Svider PF, Blake DM, Setzen M, Folbe AJ, Baredes S, Eloy JA. Rhinology fellowship training and its scholarly impact. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2013;27:e131-e134.
31. Solomon SS, Tom SC, Pichert J, Wasserman D, Powers AC. Impact of medical student research in the development of physician-scientists. J Investig Med. 2003;51:149-156.
32. Sharp S, Puscas L, Schwab B, Lee WT. Comparison of applicant criteria and program expectations for choosing residency programs in the otolaryngology match. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;144:174-179.
33. Puscas L, Sharp SR, Schwab B, Lee WT. Qualities of residency applicants: comparison of otolaryngology program criteria with applicant expectations. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;138:10-14.
34. Chole RA, Ogden MA. Predictors of future success in otolaryngology residency applicants. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;138:707-712.
35. Burgoyne LN, O'Flynn S, Boylan GB. Undergraduate medical research: the student perspective. Med Educ Online. 2010;15. DOI: 10.3402/meo.v15i0.5212.
36. Frishman WH. Student research projects and theses: should they be a requirement for medical school graduation? Heart Dis. 2001;3:140-144.
37. Franzblau LE, Kotsis SV, Chung KC. Mentorship: concepts and application to plastic surgery training programs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:837e-843e.
38. Moed BR. Mentoring: the role of a mentor and finding one. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(Suppl 1):S23-S24.
39. Healy NA, Cantillon P, Malone C, Kerin MJ. Role models and mentors in surgery. Am J Surg. 2012;204:256-261.
40. Kuehn BM. More women choose careers in surgery: bias, work-life issues remain challenges. JAMA. 2012;307:1899-1901.
41. Barry PN, Fallat ME. Medical student mentorship in a university setting as a strategy for a career in surgery. Am Surg. 2011;77:1432-1434.
42. Gaster N, Gaster M. A critical assessment of the h-index. Bioessays. 2012;34:830-832.
43. Hirsch JE. Does the h index have predictive power? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:19193-19198.
44. Rad AE, Shahgholi L, Kallmes D. Impact of self-citation on the h index in the field of academic radiology. Acad Radiol. 2012;19:455-457.
45. Svider PF, Husain Q, Folbe AJ, Couldwell WT, Liu JK, Eloy JA. Assessing NIH funding and scholarly impact in neurological surgery. J Neurosurg. published online November 12, 2013; DOI: 10.3171/2013.8.JNS13938.
46. Eloy JA, Svider PF, Folbe AJ, Couldwell WT, Liu JK. Comparison of plaintiff and defendant expert witness qualification in malpractice litigation in neurological surgery. J Neurosurg. 2014;120:185-190.
47. Eloy JA, Svider PF, Patel D, Setzen M, Baredes S. Comparison of plaintiff and defendant expert witness qualification in malpractice litigation in otolaryngology. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;148:764-769.
48. Eloy JA, Svider PF, Patel D, Setzen M, Baredes S. In response to "comparison of plaintiff and defendant expert witness qualification in malpractice litigation in otolaryngology". Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;149:649-650.
49. Svider PF, Lopez SA, Bhagat N, Eloy JA, Langer PD. The association between scholarly impact and National Institutes of Health funding in ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:423-428.
50. Eloy JA, Svider PF, Setzen M, Baredes S, Folbe AJ. Does receiving an American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation Centralized Otolaryngology Research Efforts grant influence career path and scholarly impact among fellowship-trained rhinologists? Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014;4:85-90