Techniques for analyzing biomaterial surface structure, morphology and topography

Surface Modification of Biomaterials: Methods Analysis and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 232-255

  Murthy, N Sanjeeva ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Contact angle; Microscopy; Raman spectroscopy; Surface structure; X ray scattering

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895064606     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-1-84569-640-5.50009-9     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Wong J.Y., Leach J.B., Brown X.Q. Balance of chemistry, topography, and mechanics at the cell-biomaterial interface: issues and challenges for assessing the role of substrate mechanics on cell response. Surface Science 2004, 570:119-133.
2. Chen C.S., et al. Geometric control of cell life and death. Science 1997, 276:1425-1428.
3. Huang S., Ingber D.E. Shape-dependent control of cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis: switching between attractors in cell regulatory networks. Exp. Cell. Res. 2000, 261:91-103.
4. Polymer surfaces and interfaces: characterization. modification and applications 2008, Springer, Berlin. M. Stamm (Ed.).
5. Merrett K., et al. Surface analysis methods for characterizing polymeric biomaterials. J. Biomater. Sci. Polymer Edn 2002, 13(6):593-621.
6. Haque F. Application of nanoindentation to development of biomedical materials. Surface Engineering 2003, 19(4):253-268.
7. Bedoui F., Sansoz F., Murthy N.S. Incidence of nanoscale heterogeneity on the nanoindentation of a semicrystalline polymer: experiments and modeling. Acta Materialia 2008, 56:2296-2306.
8. Sawyer L.C., Grubb D.T. Polymer Microscopy 2008, Springer, 540. 3rd edn.
9. Ohtsu M., Hori H. Near-field nano-optics - From basic principles to nanofabrication and nanophotonics 1999, Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York.
10. Semwogerere D., Weeks E.R. Confocal microscopy. Encyclopedia of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering 2005, 1-10.
11. Shotton D. Confocal scanning optical microscopy and its applications for biological specimens. Journal of Cell Science 1989, 94:175-206.
12. Smith I.O., et al. Confocal laser scanning microscopy as a tool for imaging cancelous bone. J. Biomed. Mat. Res. Part B: Appl. Biomat. 2006, 79:185-192.
13. Dental biomaterials: Imaging, testing and modelling 2009, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge. R.V. Curtis, T.F. Watson (Eds.).
14. Prado da Silva M.H., et al. Surface analysis of titanium dental implants with different topographies. Mat. Re 2000, 3(3):61-67.
15. Murthy N.S., et al. Self-assembled and etched cones on laser-ablated polymer surfaces. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 100:1-12.
16. Handbook of Biomaterials Evaluation: Scientific. Technical and Clinical Testing of Implant Materials 1998, 2nd edn, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. A.F. von Recum (Ed.).
17. Jandt K.D. Atomic force microscopy of biomaterials surfaces and interfaces. Surface Science 2001, 491(3):303-332.
18. Siedlecki C.A., Marchant R.E. Atomic force microscopy for characterization of the biomaterials interface. Biomaterials 1998, 19(4-5):441-454.
19. 2 on Ti using electrochemical AFM: freely corroding versus potentiostatically held. Surface Science 2001, 491:370-387.
20. Holland N.B., Marchant R.E. Individual plasma proteins detected on rough biomaterials by phase imaging AFM. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2000, 51:307-315.
21. Assender H., Bliznyuk V., Porfyrakis K. How surface topography relates to materials' properties. Science 2002, 297:973-976.
22. Bagno A., et al. Contact profilometry and correspondence analysis to correlate surface properties and cell adhesion in vitro of uncoated and coated Ti and Ti6Al4V disks. Biomaterials 2004, 25:2437-2445.
23. Wennerberg A., et al. Characterizing three-dimensional topography of engineering and biomaterial surfaces by confocal laser scanning and stylus techniques. Med. Eng. Phys. 1996, 18:548-556.
24. Stamm M. Polymer surfaces, interfaces and thin films studied by x-ray and neutron reflectometry. Scattering in polymeric and colloidal systems 2000, 495-534. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Amsterdam. W. Brown, K. Mortensen (Eds.).
25. Stone V.W., et al. Roughness of free surfaces of bulk amorphous polymers as studied by x-ray surface scattering and atomic force microscopy. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 60:5883-5894.
26. Miller C.E., et al. Characterization of biological thin films at the solid-liquid interface by X-ray reflectivity. Phys. Rev. Lett 2005, 94: 238104 (1-4).
27. Pezzotti G. Stress microscopy and confocal Raman imaging of load-bearing surfaces in artificial hip joints. Exp. Rev. Med. Dev. 2007, 4(2):165-189.
28. Pezzotti G., et al. Confocal Raman spectroscopic analysis of ceramic hip joints. Key Engineering Materials 2006, 309-311:1211-1214.
29. Andrew J.J., Hancewicz T.M. Rapid analysis of Raman image data using two-way multivariate curve resolution. Appl. Spectro. 1998, 52:797-807.
30. Pezzotti G., et al. Confocal Raman spectroscopic analysis of cross-linked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene for application in artificial hip joints. J. Biomed. Opt 2007, 12(1): 0141011 (1-14).
31. Grundke K. Characterization of polymer surfaces by wetting and electrokinetic measurements - contact angle, interfacial tension and zeta potential. Polymer surfaces and interfaces 2008, Springer, Berlin. M. Stamm (Ed.).
32. Extrand C.W. Encyclopedia of surface and colloid science 2006, 2876-2891. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. P. Somasundaran (Ed.).
33. Muller B., et al. Impact of nanometer-scale roughness on contact-angle hysteresis and globulin adsorption. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 2001, 19(5):1715-1720.
34. Doose S. Trends in Biological Optical Microscopy. Chem. Phys. Chem. 2008, 9:523-528.