Management knowledge and the organization of team science in university research centers

Journal of Technology Transfer

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 75-92

  Boardman, Craig ^a   Ponomariov, Branco ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

Organized research unit; R D management; Research collaboration; Team science; Technology transfer; University research center cooperative research center; University industry interaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895059430     PISSN: 08929912     EISSN: 15737047     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-012-9271-x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
2. Boardman, C. (2012). Organizational capital in boundary-spanning collaborations: Internal and external approaches to organizational structure and personnel authority. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 22, 497-526.
3. Boardman, C., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Role strain in university research centers. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(4), 430-463.
4. Boardman, C., & Gray, D. (2010). The new science and engineering management: Cooperative research centers as government policies, industry strategies, and organizations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(5), 445-459.
5. Boardman, C., & Ponomariov, B. (2007). Reward systems and NSF university research centers: The impact of tenure on university scientists' valuation of applied and commercially-relevant research. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(1), 51-70.
6. Bozeman, B., & Boardman, C. (2003). Managing the new multipurpose, multidiscipline university research center: Institutional innovation in the academic community. Washington, DC: IBM Endowment for the Business of Government.
7. Bresnen, M., Goussevskaia, A., & Swan, J. (2004). Embedding new management knowledge in project-based organizations. Organizational Studies, 25(9), 1535-1555.
8. Damanpour, F. (1996). Organizational complexity and innovation: Developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Science, 42, 693-716.
9. Dewar, R., & Dutton, J. E. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 32, 1422-1433.
10. Dietz, J. S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Academic careers, patents, and productivity: Industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 34(3), 349-367.
11. Ettlie, J., Bridges, W. P., & O'Keefe, R. D. (1984). Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation. Management Science, 30(6), 682-695.
12. Feller, I., Ailes, C. P., & Roessner, J. D. (2002). Impacts of research universities on technological innovation in industry: Evidence from engineering research centers. Research Policy, 31, 457-474.
13. Frankland, J., & Bloor, M. (1999). Some issues arising in the systematic analysis of focus group materials. In R. S. Barbour & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice (pp. 144-155). London: Sage.
14. Geisler, E. (1989). University-industry relations: A review of major issues. In A. N. Link & G. Tassey (Eds.), Cooperative research and development: The industry-university-government relationship (pp. 43-64). Boston: Kluwer.
15. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
16. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
17. Griliches, Z. (1992). The search for R&D spillovers. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, 29-47.
18. Hobday, M. (2000). The project-based organization: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems? Research Policy, 29, 871-893.
19. Jaffe, A. B. (1989). Characterizing the 'technological position' of firms, with application to quantifying technological opportunity and research spillovers. Research Policy, 18(2), 87-97.
20. Jaffee, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographical localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577-598.
21. Koskinen, K. U. (2000). Tacit knowledge as a promoter of project success. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 6, 41-47.
22. Lee, T. W. (1999). Using qualitative methods in organizational research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
23. Lindkvist, L. (2004). Governing project-based firms: Promoting market-like processes within hierarchies. Journal of Management and Governance, 8, 3-25.
24. Maxwell, Joseph A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Merton, R. K. (1957). On social structure and science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
26. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
27. Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398-427.
28. Ouchi, W. G. (1980). Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(1), 129-141.
29. Polanyi, M. (1962). The Republic of science: Its political and economic theory. Minerva, 1(54), 54-73.
30. Polanyi, G. (1966). Tacit dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
31. Ponomariov, B., & Boardman, C. (2010). Influencing scientists' collaboration and productivity patterns through new institutions: University research centers and scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 39(5), 613-624.
32. Rethemeyer, K. R., & Hatmaker, D. M. (2008). Network management reconsidered: An inquiry into management of network structures in public sector service provision. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 617-646.
33. Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage.
34. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
35. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
36. Sydow, J., & Windeler, A. (1998). Organizing and evaluating interfirm networks: A structurationist perspective on network processes and effectiveness. Organization Science, 9(3), 265-283.
37. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research, design and methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
38. Youtie, J., Libaers, D., & Bozeman, B. (2006). Institutionalization of university research centers: The case of the National Cooperative Program in Infertility Research. Technovation, 26(9), 1055-1063.