Patterns of engagement: The relationship between efficacy beliefs and task engagement at the individual versus collective level

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 133-144

  Vera, María ^a   Le Blanc, Pascale M ^b   Taris, Toon W ^c   Salanova, Marisa ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BURGOS   (Spain)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITAT JAUME I   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894923296     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: 15591816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jasp.12219     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Bakker, A. B., Albrecht, S., & Leiter, M. P. (2011). Key questions regarding work engagement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 4-28.
2. Bakker, A. B., Van Emmerik, I. J. H., & Euwema, M. C. (2006). Crossover of burnout and engagement in work teams. Work & Occupations, 33, 464-489.
3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy. The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
4. Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 21-41.
5. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26.
6. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307-337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
7. Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Retrieved December, 27, 2013, from Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations site: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/hrpubs/8/
8. Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349-381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Byrne, B. M. (2009). Estructural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. New York, London: Routledge.
10. Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-246.
11. Cohen, S. G., & Gibson, C. B. (2003). In the beginning: Introduction and framework. In C. B. Gibson & S. G. Cohen (Eds.), Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness (pp. 1-13). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. DeShon, R. P., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Schmidt, A. M., Milner, K. R., & Wiechmann, D. (2004). A multiple-goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1035-1056.
13. Dougiamas, M. (2007). Moodle 1.9. Australia: Free Software Foundation, Inc.
14. Fernandez-Ballesteros, R., Diez-Nicolas, J., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Bandura, A. (2002). Determinants and structural relation of personal efficacy to collective efficacy. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 107-125.
15. Fritz, C., Lam, C. F., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2011). It's the little things that matter: An examination of knowledge workers' energy management. Academy of Management Perspective, 25, 28-39.
16. Griffith, T. L., Sawyer, J. E., & Neale, M. A. (2003). Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quarterly, 27, 265-287.
17. Halbesleben, J. R. B. (2010). A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources and consequences. In A. Bakker & M. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 102-117). New York: Psychology Press.
18. Hulbert, N. J., & Morrison, V. L. (2006). A preliminary study into stress in palliative care: Optimism, self-efficacy and social support. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 11, 246-254.
19. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
20. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1999). LISREL 8.30 (computer manual). Chicago: Scientific Software.
21. Kayworth, T. R., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 7-40.
22. Kirkman, B. L., & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31, 700-718.
23. Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Gibson, C. B., Tesluk, P. E., & McPherson, S. O. (2002). Five challenges to virtual team success: Lessons from Sabre, Inc. Academy of Management Executive, 16, 67-79.
24. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organization: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3-90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25. Lee, T. C., Yang, Y. K., Chen, P. S., Hung, N. C., Lin, S. H., Chang, F. L., etal. (2006). Different dimensions of social support for the caregivers of patients with schizophrenia: Main effect and stress-buffering models. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 60, 546-550.
26. Llorens, S., Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2007). Does a positive gain spiral of resources, efficacy beliefs and engagement exist? Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 825-841.
27. Locke, E. A., Frederick, E., Lee, C., & Bobko, P. (1984). Effect of self-efficacy, goals and task strategies on task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 241-251.
28. Loehr, J., & Schwartz, T. (2003). The power of full engagement: Managing energy, not time, is the key to high performance and renewal. New York: Free Press.
29. Lorente, L., Salanova, M., Martínez, I., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). Extension of the job demands-resources model in the prediction of burnout and engagement among teachers over time. Psicothema, 20, 354-360.
30. Marlowe, N. (1998). Self-efficacy moderates the impact of stressful events on headache. Headache, 38, 662-667.
31. Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., & Maynard, M. T. (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 805-835.
32. Maznevski, M. L., & Chudoba, K. M. (2000). Bridging space over time: Global virtual-team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science, 11, 473-492.
33. McArdle, J. J. (1998). Modeling longitudinal data by latent growth curve methods. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 359-406). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. McGrath, J. E., & Tschan, F. (2004). Dynamics in groups and teams: Groups as complex action systems. In M. S. Poole & A. Van de Ven (Eds.), Handbook of organizational change and innovation (pp. 50-73). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Montoya-Weiss, M. M., Massey, A. P., & Song, M. (2001). Getting it together: Temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1251-1262.
36. Parker, L. E. (1994). Working together: Perceived self- and collective-efficacy at the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 43-59.
37. Patterson, G. T. (2003). Examining the effects of coping and social support on work and life stress among police officers. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 215-226.
38. Pugh, S. D., & Dietz, J. (2008). Employee engagement at the organizational level of analysis. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 44-47.
39. Quinn, R. W. (2005). Flow in knowledge work: High performance experience in the design of national security technology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 610-641.
40. Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). A first course in structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Peiró, J. M. (2005). Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediating role of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1217-1227.
42. Salanova, M., Bresó, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2005). Hacia un modelo espiral de las creencias de eficacia en el estudio del burnout y del engagement. [Towards a spiral model of efficacy beliefs in the study of burnout and engagement]. Ansiedad y Estrés, 11, 215-231.
43. Salanova, M., Llorens, S., Cifre, E., Martínez, I., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2003). Perceived collective efficacy, subjective well-being and task performance among electronic work groups: An experimental study. Small Group Research, 34, 43-73.
44. Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W. B., Llorens, S., Peiró, J. M., & Grau, R. (2000). Desde el "burnout" al "engagement": ¿una nueva perspectiva? [From burnout to engagement: A new perspective?]. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y las Organizaciones, 16, 117-134.
45. Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W. B., Xanthopoulou, D., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). The gain spiral of resources and work engagement: Sustaining a positive worklife. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 118-131). New York: Psychology Press.
46. Schaufeli, W. B., & Salanova, M. (2011). Work engagement: On how to better catch a slippery concept. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 39-46.
47. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romà, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of burnout and engagement: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.
48. Simbula, S., Guglielmi, D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2011). A three-wave study of job resources, self-efficacy, and work engagement among Italian schoolteachers. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 285-304.
49. Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between nonwork and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 3, 518-528.
50. Spaulding, C. L. (1995). Teachers' psychological presence on students' writing-task engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 88, 210-219.
51. Tasa, K., Taggar, S., & Seijts, G. H. (2007). The development of collective efficacy in teams: A multilevel and longitudinal perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 17-27.
52. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14, 121-141.
53. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009a). Work engagement and financial returns: A diary study on the role of job and personal resources. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 183-200.
54. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009b). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 235-244.
55. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Heuven, E., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). Working in the sky: A diary study on work engagement among flight attendants. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13, 345-356.
56. Xie, D. (2007). Buffering or strengthening: The moderating effect of self-efficacy on stressor-strain relationship. Journal of Career Assessment, 15, 351-366.